I said the NESCAC was the best top to bottom conference. I never said it had the top team.
Plattsburgh (biggest one here winning 4 straight titles), Elmira, Norwich, Adrian, UWRF and Gustavus have traditionally been the top best of the best over the last 10-15 years. Most years Middlebury can run with this group and then Amherst occasionally get in the mix too.
No one is denying that Gustavus, Adrian, UWRF, Hamline etc. have had good teams in the past. They certainly have. The reality is more teams exist in the East which means more conferences and more bids to the tournament. That’s just how it works at every level of every NCAA sport.
More teams also can lead to the larger gaps between the top and bottom teams so you see some wonky scores when mid to high level teams play the very bottom ones.
You stated the NESCAC should receive 2-3 bids in the NCAA playoffs because of their conference parity and superior play of their teams, Pool C bids have nothing to do with region. Yes you never stated they have the best team, but why would a single conference be deserving of 2 out of 3 bids if they don't have the best team? It's implied by your statement of the conference being deserving.
I believe you can understand where I'm going with this. The selection of Pool C bids are not only a travesty to the West, but every other conference in the East who might have a deserving 2nd place team if 2 out of 3 pool C bids continually come from the NESCAC.
This all could be addressed and avoided with one easy rule change. A maximum of 2 teams from a conference allowed in the NCAA tournament for a sport with only 3 at large bids giving more team representation across the board.