What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Lol, yeah ok :rolleyes:

It's a play on words you moron.

Buttchug is a play on words? Havent heard that one since Middle School and it wasnt a "play of words" it was a homophobic slur.

You may not have meant it as a homophobic slur...but as the Super Left always tells us that doesnt matter all that matters is how it was taken and sorry trix but you are wrong here.
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Coming from you that’s a compliment.

So now, even in the face of everyone telling you how wrong you are, you go to attacking fellow Liberals who are usually in lockstep with you. Interesting tactic...
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Anyone who actually thinks that’s a homophobic slur is an idiot lmao. Unless there’s something inherently homosexual about butt chugging then you’re objectively wrong but facts have never been your strong suit.
 
Last edited:
Anyone who actually thinks that’s a homophobic slur is an idiot lmao. Like Handy who has proven that countless times. Unless there’s something inherently homosexual about butt chugging then you’re objectively wrong but facts have never been your strong suit.

It doesn't matter. If people think it is, it is.
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

You have a fork in the road. On once side are the people who feel Dems have been doing nothing but losing over the past 40 years and have accomplished zilch (Kep

IF you are in the "nothing got done" crowd, you then split into "Obama was really a conservative" (Kep

Your act hasn't changed much.
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Yeah most people don’t understand marginal tax rates so I’d be interested to see exactly how that was phrased (I.e. if they explained quickly how marginal tax rates work). Good call Stauber
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Anyone who actually thinks that’s a homophobic slur is an idiot lmao. Unless there’s something inherently homosexual about butt chugging then you’re objectively wrong but facts have never been your strong suit.

Coming from you that is a compliment. You run from facts like Trump runs from subpoenas :D

You can keep fighting if you like it is no skin off my nose. I just think it is funny that you are fighting with all the people on your side. That would give me pause but that is me you can do what you like. Trust me this is very entertaining for me for a bevy of reasons ;)
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

The people on my side may agree that the Republican Party is bad but outside of that I’m not sure we agree that much.
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

This is one of those jokes that say more about the teller than the ostensible topic. It's not so much that it's offensive. It's just that it's so unfunny; like elementary school humor. And yes, I recognize you were making fun of those people too, don't worry.

And yet, there are people, even here, who think it's the height of clever wit.

That was the sole purpose of the post. It's not a funny joke. It's so obviously unfunny, it would be considered a political Dad Joke.
 
My standing reason why the common people do anything is they have the IQ of a slightly above average cricket.

Does mookie have a more likely reason than that?

Have to go with agent K (is that him?).

A person is smart. People are stupid.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top