Canadians doing a good job to get US off its game so far.
Waiting to see US's speed. Canada looks like the quicker team and has a 2-1 lead with 13 minutes remaining
Canadians doing a good job to get US off its game so far.
IOC finally states the obvious, hopefully puts an end to four years of media overreaction and misguided comparisons from everything from softball to snow leopards.
IOC spokesman says women's hockey not at risk of getting kicked out of Olympics
IOC spokesman Mark Adams says organizers are ''very pleased'' with the quality of play in the women's hockey tournament so far in Sochi.
Because of a format change that separated the top and bottom teams in the world, there have been fewer blowouts than in past Olympics.
Then-IOC President Jacques Rogge had been quoted after the Vancouver games as saying, ''We cannot continue without improvement.'' But Adams says the former president was supportive of women's hockey and was only thinking ''way into the future.''
Well despite some horrendous officiating including the second goal,...
Hopefully these teams meet again.
It's funny how we all see things only from our favourite team's perspective. It would have been a horrible call if the second goal was NOT allowed. Vetter never had control of the puck and the ref would have blown it if she quick whistled the play dead.
I though Canada was full marks today, especially after how dominant the Americans have been in the last few games. Kessel was invisible today which was very surprising.
Should be a great final and I wouldn't be surprised if the outcome is different.
It's funny how we all see things only from our favourite team's perspective. It would have been a horrible call if the second goal was NOT allowed. Vetter never had control of the puck and the ref would have blown it if she quick whistled the play dead.
I though Canada was full marks today, especially after how dominant the Americans have been in the last few games. Kessel was invisible today which was very surprising.
Should be a great final and I wouldn't be surprised if the outcome is different.
Well, the rule is, I believe, (i) the refs should blow the whistle when they lose sight of the puck, and (ii) it is a goal only if the puck went in prior to the whistle being blown. Even if you argue the whistle was blown to soon, it is obvious from the review the puck did not go in before the whistle. Calling it a goal was a bad call.
They did. The review was part "audio" review - they were trying to hear when the whistle blew as compared to when the puck crossed the line. They replayed it 3-4 times on NBC sports.
Thank you on both accounts. But also apologies for the last one, though. I recognize it wasn't needed.
Well, the rule is, I believe, (i) the refs should blow the whistle when they lose sight of the puck, and (ii) it is a goal only if the puck went in prior to the whistle being blown. Even if you argue the whistle was blown to soon, it is obvious from the review the puck did not go in before the whistle. Calling it a goal was a bad call.
Regardless, that 3rd goal was all USA's mistake, and the fact that USA had hardly any shots in the 3rd is worrisome.
Question: Should that last penalty have been a delayed penalty since USA was on a rush with full possession. I thought it was an offsides call at first.
On a related note, I think it was the US D (not sure which one) who pushed the puck through Vetter's pads while trying to "help" her by putting the puck in her reach, right?
Seconded.With the importance of these games I will never understand the bypassing of so many qualified refs in the world, just to make sure the person with the armband has a ponytail and is not from the US or Canada.
I'll take my chances with possible bias with a CAN or US woman wearing the orange or having a male ref for the CAN-US matchup, rather than watch this buffoonery.
Is Haley Irwin suiting up for team Canada? Injured? Haven't been following too closely . . . but, haven't heard her name yet during the Olympics?
Well, the rule is, I believe, (i) the refs should blow the whistle when they lose sight of the puck, and (ii) it is a goal only if the puck went in prior to the whistle being blown. Even if you argue the whistle was blown to soon, it is obvious from the review the puck did not go in before the whistle. Calling it a goal was a bad call.
Regardless, that 3rd goal was all USA's mistake, and the fact that USA had hardly any shots in the 3rd is worrisome.
Question: Should that last penalty have been a delayed penalty since USA was on a rush with full possession. I thought it was an offsides call at first.