Cornell 0 - UMD 2 after two. SOG Cornell 13 - UMD 23.
Voorheis is one extra large individual in net for Cornell.
Fast game with a few nice passing sequences...UMD came close on a few other chances.
How does Mercyhurst get dragged into this debate?!
Not to mention, that makes no sense. If playing a weak schedule and winning makes you a D3 school, then why not include BU and QU??
You couldn't figure that out while they stood and watched BC skate? What, did you think that BC was really that good? Oh, you did. How cute.Breaking: Cornell blows
With the way the RPI works, the worst opponent to play is a strong team from an underperforming conference. You play Mercyhurst, you also get a large dose of its opponents' records, and last year, both Lindenwood and Penn State were very weak. This year, Lindenwood is a little better, Robert Morris is much worse, and Syracuse is all over the map. IMO, the two worst opponents for a contending team to schedule based on results up to now are Mercyhurst and Boston College. They will be hard to beat, and if you do, you won't get a big reward in the criteria for doing so. If you play them and lose, it kills you in the PairWise. Better to schedule Sacred Heart and not risk anything, given the Ratings Percentage Index is too dumb to know the difference.It's more likely (truth be told) that some teams fear having to acknowledge that the smallest conference is competitive
I still do until proven otherwiseYou couldn't figure that out while they stood and watched BC skate? What, did you think that BC was really that good? Oh, you did. How cute.
That magical top seven that we speak of so often. It just shows that even the second-best team in the country can be undervalued when it has played the dominant power five times.It is frustrating, though, that BC is going to have to pull a Minnesota and play exactly zero (0) top 7 teams in the regular season on their way to an undefeated season.
It's funny you say that because I have absolutely no recollection of this happening whatsoever. I think we mentioned this in another thread in a couple weeks ago. If it weren't for the fact that this stuff is easily looked up I would put $100 dollars on that having never happened. lolBC this year reminds me more of 2007-08 Harvard that ran the table in the ECAC and was named the No. 1 seed for the tournament...It isn't one of the better-remembered No. 1 seeds.
BC this year reminds me more of 2007-08 Harvard that ran the table in the ECAC and was named the No. 1 seed for the tournament. It advanced to a Frozen Four held in Minnesota and then played Wisconsin. It isn't one of the better-remembered No. 1 seeds. Most elite athletes don't train on a steady diet of cupcakes.
Yeah, the Wildcats looked like a team that had a lot of practice at attacking but not so much practice at defending. They almost couldn't believe they had lost when the game ended. A lot more shots than the opponent, but it is hard to win if the opponent scores on 20% of its SOG.But the other semi final game, UNH vs UMD, was a barnburner.
Yeah, the Wildcats looked like a team that had a lot of practice at attacking but not so much practice at defending. They almost couldn't believe they had lost when the game ended. A lot more shots than the opponent, but it is hard to win if the opponent scores on 20% of its SOG.
How does Mercyhurst get dragged into this debate?!
Not to mention, that makes no sense. If playing a weak schedule and winning makes you a D3 school, then why not include BU and QU??
You couldn't figure that out while they stood and watched BC skate? What, did you think that BC was really that good? Oh, you did. How cute.
With the way the RPI works, the worst opponent to play is a strong team from an underperforming conference. You play Mercyhurst, you also get a large dose of its opponents' records, and last year, both Lindenwood and Penn State were very weak. This year, Lindenwood is a little better, Robert Morris is much worse, and Syracuse is all over the map. IMO, the two worst opponents for a contending team to schedule based on results up to now are Mercyhurst and Boston College. They will be hard to beat, and if you do, you won't get a big reward in the criteria for doing so. If you play them and lose, it kills you in the PairWise. Better to schedule Sacred Heart and not risk anything, given the Ratings Percentage Index is too dumb to know the difference.![]()
IMO, from day one, Mike Sisti has been willing to schedule any team. In the early years, the problem was that Mercyhurst was largely unknown, so the Lakers were harder to market to a fan base than a team that wasn't as good but was a bigger name. The weak schedule over the years has been more a product of the CHA (which has made big strides in recent years) and that a lot of potential opponents can get a comparable opponent for a cheaper trip. Most coaches like to compete, but the system really discourages playing a rigorous schedule. You're better off sweeping a bad team than splitting with a good one. Kudos to Doug Derraugh for keeping MU on Cornell's schedule for so long....often comments seem to suggest Mercyhurst does not want to play top teams. That is NOT the case.
Gophers 4, Huskies 0 after two. SOG 31-12.
Not really -- lost a couple games most expected that they'd lose.Bad evening for ECAC, huh?
Not really -- lost a couple games most expected that they'd lose.