Less than hockey, but probably not for a fraction of the cost. Lacrosse needs more team members, probably more coaches, higher lodging and transportation costs, comparable equipment costs, and possibly a new artificial surface field. Some savings, but not a lot.Unfortunately, with the increasing popularity of men's lacrosse the schools can accomplish their goal by starting a lacrosse team that can produce the same number of men as student athletes at a fraction of the cost of an ice hockey program.
Less than hockey, but probably not for a fraction of the cost. Lacrosse needs more team members, probably more coaches, higher lodging and transportation costs, comparable equipment costs, and possibly a new artificial surface field. Some savings, but not a lot.
Hearing a rumor that Stonehill College may be dropping hockey as a Varsity sport and adding mens lacrosse.
Scheduling as a DII, being very difficult to find games, nd not wanting to spend the money to be a DI are the reasons behind the rumored move.
Too bad if true as they are a no scholarship, good academic team that has had a program for awhile.
I'm guessing there will be more DII teams to follow their lead and go club.
We'll see.
Okay, you win! My point was if you are going to play lacrosse seriously and try and win conferences and get NCAA bids, you have to have multiple surfaces to play on, albeit, they can be used for other sports. You have twice as many players so that is multiple buses, more hotel rooms, etc. D-2 trips would probably be longer in distance since the heart of lacrosse is the middle Atlantic states, especially for D-2. Unless they are going to be D-2 and play a largely D-3 schedule. Good luck with that! Hockey equipment is more expensive, but lacrosse gear is far from cheap. We are not talking a pair of shorts and a tee. I would be interested to know just how much they will save?Comparison cost between hockey and lacrosse ? Not even close.
Northeastern's womens hockey budget for last year was $ 1.3 million , including scholarships but excluding ice time. Plus, the additional cost of a new team joining a league .
You think the cost of a DIII mens lacrosse team is close to that ?
Equipment the same ? Not close. A team bus is a bus. As to a turf field, $1 million to be used by multiple teams ( football. soccer, field hockey) versus the cost of a hockey rink to build ?
look, the point was, you can get 40-50 kids on a DIII lacrosse team versus 20-30 on a DI hockey team at a significantly lower cost. That is it.
If a DII school is looking to increase men than on a strictly cost benefit basis, lacrosse is the way to go.
I'm a hockey guy but the numbers are the numbers.
Sorry to see Stonehill go if true. It is amazing how popular lacrosse has become in the North east.
Okay, you win! My point was if you are going to play lacrosse seriously and try and win conferences and get NCAA bids, you have to have multiple surfaces to play on, albeit, they can be used for other sports. You have twice as many players so that is multiple buses, more hotel rooms, etc. D-2 trips would probably be longer in distance since the heart of lacrosse is the middle Atlantic states, especially for D-2. Unless they are going to be D-2 and play a largely D-3 schedule. Good luck with that! Hockey equipment is more expensive, but lacrosse gear is far from cheap. We are not talking a pair of shorts and a tee. I would be interested to know just how much they will save?
including a rule in the late 80s that eliminated schools like Dayton and Drake to play Division III football while being DI in everything else.
I don't believe they have a riink. I think they rent ice in Foxboro.The cost of running a hockey rink alone trumps everything.
Colorado College won a couple of hockey titles in the 50's and Hartwick won a soccer title in the 70's but I don't know what division the rest of their teams played in at that time.
I don't believe they have a riink. I think they rent ice in Foxboro.
Most DII schools play a New England heavy schedule. The rest of the games, away from a southern spring trip,are in Long Island and upstate NY.Okay, you win! My point was if you are going to play lacrosse seriously and try and win conferences and get NCAA bids, you have to have multiple surfaces to play on, albeit, they can be used for other sports. You have twice as many players so that is multiple buses, more hotel rooms, etc. D-2 trips would probably be longer in distance since the heart of lacrosse is the middle Atlantic states, especially for D-2. Unless they are going to be D-2 and play a largely D-3 schedule. Good luck with that! Hockey equipment is more expensive, but lacrosse gear is far from cheap. We are not talking a pair of shorts and a tee. I would be interested to know just how much they will save?
Most DII schools play a New England heavy schedule. The rest of the games, away from a southern spring trip,are in Long Island and upstate NY.
Not really different from their hockey trips with the difference being few if any over night trips.
As to cost of hockey versus lacrosse equipment, a pair of skates would pay for 3-4 sets lacrosse equipment.
Ice time isn't cheap , 20 weeks x 15 hours per week x$ 200 per hour = you can do the math
Wow, those must be expensive skates!As to cost of hockey versus lacrosse equipment, a pair of skates would pay for 3-4 sets lacrosse equipment.
$800 for skates yes but a lot players pay for their own skates. If you can outfit four guys on a lacrosse team for $800 you must be getting the stuff from a garage sale. You might be able to outfit one guy for $800 if you don't go top shelf but certainly not four. However you can easily outfit four or more Laxers for what it would cost to outfit one hockey goalie.
You reach a fork in the thread, take it.