2012 Presidential Election Part 4

[Gurtholfin]

Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

NOW! Set the hook.
I'm proud of you, streaker, nice work.

Yeah right. Fishing by using the same bait as every other conservative poster (including you) on here? So you're all just kidding or trying to get a rise?

Amazingly coordinated effort you guys have here. Well done!

 

[geezer]

Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

yeah right. Fishing by using the same bait as every other conservative poster (including you) on here? So you're all just kidding or trying to get a rise?

Amazingly coordinated effort you guys have here. Well done!

do you have any proof of these allegations sir!!!!!11!

 

[Gurtholfin]

Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

do you have any proof of these allegations sir!!!!!11!

Admittedly circumstantial when it comes to your (right) leaning, but enough to go to trial.

 

[burd]

Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

do you have any proof of these allegations sir!!!!!11!

I'll testify! I'll testify!

 

[geezer]

Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Admittedly circumstantial when it comes to your (right) leaning, but enough to go to trial.

That's not an allegation. I'm proud of my rock ribbed rightie conservatism (or "fundie knuckledragger" if you prefer), which is a conservativer conservatism than 90% of the people on here and 99.9 % of politicians running for office nowadays. I'm conservativer than Obama and even more conservativer than Romney. This is not something I've ever tried to hide.

I'm such an extremist that I would go so far as having an actual plan to pay our bills as a country. Shocking as that may sound nowadays.

Socially speaking, I would even make it illegal to kill your own kids. *gasp*

 

[ExileOnDaytonStreet]

Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

I'm such an extremist that I would go so far as having an actual plan to pay our bills as a country. Shocking as that may sound nowadays.

At this point, it might be illegal to pay our bills as a country. Only way to explain how we've gotten so far from that in the last decade or so.

 

[geezer]

Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

At this point, it might be illegal to pay our bills as a country. Only way to explain how we've gotten so far from that in the last decade or so.

here's how: buncha peckin liberals are running the Democratic and especially the Republican parties. Spend like there's no tomorrow.

 

[ScoobyDoo]

Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

here's how: buncha peckin liberals are running the Democratic and especially the Republican parties. Spend like there's no tomorrow.

So called conservatives spend money faster and with more girth than any liberals I know.

 

[Old Pio]

Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

First off, let's hear someone other than the right-wing blogosphere report on this.

What assistance. Invade?

You know as well as anyone that Presidents have to make uncomfortable decisions when it comes to situations like this. They have to weigh much more than a few American lives in a foreign country. Every President, whether Democrat or Republican must deal with this - part of the job.

They can't afford to be arm-chair generals like you or I can. If it's me, we send every available asset and level a six block radius, **** the torpedos, to protect our own. Presidents and military leaders have to be more measured in their approach. Imagine how gut-wrenching making those decisions must be, knowing that you could try to help, but can't.

I'm sure that even your boy Bush had an uncomfortable decision or two that he had to make.

Quit acting as if this type of decision or outcome is exclusive to Obama. Grow up.

Somewhere a boiler is missing its plate. You ladies are so obsessed with your anti-Bush myths that you can't or won't differentiate between an "invasion" and the application of a little force (AC-130 for instance) to put those Islamist pals of His Liarness to sleep.

Thank you for your addition to the Obama lexicon. We can add "uncomfortable decisions" to "bumps in the road" and an outcome that was "not optimal." So by referring to His Liarness' criminal inaction here as an "uncomfortable decision" you're admitting he did nothing? Intentionally? Let's see how that plays. "It was an "uncomfortable decision," but I let those poor buggers in the Benghazi consulate die horrible deaths. Trust me, I had my reasons. I wasn't misinformed. I just did nothing, despite the fact that there were numerous military assets available, to help those guys."

So now that you've admitted His Liarness did nothing, why don't you tell us all why. I'm sure we'd all like to hear the "thinking" behind His Islamistness' "difficult decision" not to help some Americans in harms way. And let's get it on the record before next Tuesday so we can all judge.

Obama DENIED People DIED Then he LIED

 

[Gurtholfin]

Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Somewhere a boiler is missing its plate. You ladies are so obsessed with your anti-Bush myths that you can't or won't differentiate between an "invasion" and the application of a little force (AC-130 for instance) to put those Islamist pals of His Liarness to sleep.

Thank you for your addition to the Obama lexicon. We can add "uncomfortable decisions" to "bumps in the road" and an outcome that was "not optimal." So by referring to His Liarness' criminal inaction here as an "uncomfortable decision" you're admitting he did nothing? Intentionally? Let's see how that plays. "It was an "uncomfortable decision," but I let those poor buggers in the Benghazi consulate die horrible deaths. Trust me, I had my reasons. I wasn't misinformed. I just did nothing, despite the fact that there were numerous military assets available, to help those guys."

So now that you've admitted His Liarness did nothing, why don't you tell us all why. I'm sure we'd all like to hear the "thinking" behind His Islamistness' "difficult decision" not to help some Americans in harms way. And let's get it on the record before next Tuesday so we can all judge.

Obama DENIED People DIED Then he LIED

Are you actually trying to respond to what I wrote or to the narrative on loop in your head?


As soon as you get called on something, you without fail change the argument by an increment or two. Nice tactic. That way you never have to actually prove or support anything you're writing.

Round and round we go!

 

[Bob Gray]

Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Gotta say, that "not optimal" comment from Obama was one of the worst dance efforts he's put in for awhile. Of course the media give him a pass as always. Obama's teflon nature makes Reagon look like he was the Lester Hayes of politics.

 

[Rover]

Somewhere a boiler is missing its plate. You ladies are so obsessed with your anti-Bush myths that you can't or won't differentiate between an "invasion" and the application of a little force (AC-130 for instance) to put those Islamist pals of His Liarness to sleep.

Thank you for your addition to the Obama lexicon. We can add "uncomfortable decisions" to "bumps in the road" and an outcome that was "not optimal." So by referring to His Liarness' criminal inaction here as an "uncomfortable decision" you're admitting he did nothing? Intentionally? Let's see how that plays. "It was an "uncomfortable decision," but I let those poor buggers in the Benghazi consulate die horrible deaths. Trust me, I had my reasons. I wasn't misinformed. I just did nothing, despite the fact that there were numerous military assets available, to help those guys."

So now that you've admitted His Liarness did nothing, why don't you tell us all why. I'm sure we'd all like to hear the "thinking" behind His Islamistness' "difficult decision" not to help some Americans in harms way. And let's get it on the record before next Tuesday so we can all judge.

Obama DENIED People DIED Then he LIED

Nice to see they gave you your ex-lax on time this afternoon! Interesting again how you call the CIA into question, an agency run by a highly decorated former general. I guess for you implying corruption upon a fellow serviceman is okay if the guy agrees to work for a Dem, right?

 

[geezer]

Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

So called conservatives spend money faster and with more girth than any liberals I know.

This is EXACTLY the problem I am referring to. And somehow people accept the conservative label and run with it, all evidence to the contrary. There are basically no conservatives in government.

(accepting the root base definition that "a conservative" wishes to "conserve" resources, which is itself debatable when everyone is a waster)

 

[ScoobyDoo]

Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Nice to see they gave you your ex-lax on time this afternoon! Interesting again how you call the CIA into question, an agency run by a highly decorated former general. I guess for you implying corruption upon a fellow serviceman is okay if the guy agrees to work for a Dem, right?

Lindsey Graham and John McCain never would have allowed that to happen. They'd have a balanced budget and all the resources you can imagine to stabilize the Middle East. Just ask them, they'll tell you.

 

[Gurtholfin]

Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

This is EXACTLY the problem I am referring to. And somehow people accept the conservative label and run with it, all evidence to the contrary. There are basically no conservatives in government.

So who can you vote for then?

 

[FlagDUDE08]

Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Are you actually trying to respond to what I wrote or to the narrative on loop in your head?


As soon as you get called on something, you without fail change the argument by an increment or two. Nice tactic. That way you never have to actually prove or support anything you're writing.

Round and round we go!

There's this saying about people, glass houses, and stones...

 

[Gurtholfin]

Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

There's this saying about people, glass houses, and stones...

Yeah, I'm still awaiting your response to my rebuttal of your "What we have been telling you is that the guards were told to stand down." statement.

 

[geezer]

Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

So who can you vote for then?

Well, I've been an Obama supporter most of this year as the closest thing available to my views, but it's not an easy call. You might call me a flip-flopper on the presidential race. I'm leaning Romney this week.
There are a number of proposals in MI that I'm definitely more eager to vote against, being pointless amendments to the constitution so proposed because they're too stupid to be put into action any other way.
I'm actually supporting some county millage for the sheriff dept. Money well spent IMO, good people and have been ready and responsive.

I will say I don't think there's as much diff between the two as people make it out. I might just go in there and flip a coin.

 

[FlagDUDE08]

Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Yeah, I'm still awaiting your response to my rebuttal of your "What we have been telling you is that the guards were told to stand down." statement.

All I saw was a bunch of whining about someone who has been out of office for 4 years. I didn't see anything regarding a rebuttal.

 

[FlagDUDE08]

Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Well, I've been an Obama supporter most of this year as the closest thing available to my views, but it's not an easy call. You might call me a flip-flopper on the presidential race. I'm leaning Romney this week.
There are a number of proposals in MI that I'm definitely more eager to vote against, being pointless amendments to the constitution so proposed because they're too stupid to be put into action any other way.
I'm actually supporting some county millage for the sheriff dept. Money well spent IMO, good people and have been ready and responsive.

I will say I don't think there's as much diff between the two as people make it out. I might just go in there and flip a coin.

You could always go third party, and try to find someone that supports even more of your views. A positive reason to vote for someone is a good thing.