Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4
Is that worse than lying? For two weeks? Repeatedly?
Is that worse than lying? For two weeks? Repeatedly?
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
2012 Presidential Election Part 4
- Thread starter ericredaxe
- Start date
- Status
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4
OK, "Landslide" was overly dramatic. But there are two main points I wanted to make: First that his movement is in the opposite direction of the others, which show Romney gaining (somebody's got to be wrong on that). Second, that he already has Obama winning far more comfortably, 70% chance vs. a 55% chance. Fivethirtyeight is either way ahead of the curve again, or falling behind it.
OK, "Landslide" was overly dramatic. But there are two main points I wanted to make: First that his movement is in the opposite direction of the others, which show Romney gaining (somebody's got to be wrong on that). Second, that he already has Obama winning far more comfortably, 70% chance vs. a 55% chance. Fivethirtyeight is either way ahead of the curve again, or falling behind it.
Yes its far worse to issue a bogus press release while the attack is happening slandering the staff under attack then taking two weeks to clarify what happened after conducting an investigation in a lawless land.
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4
I'm not one of those "devout ones". My vote is actually not set in stone yet, especially if "Mitt" promises to fire Bernanke, I might be inclined to let him do it.
I'm not one of those "devout ones". My vote is actually not set in stone yet, especially if "Mitt" promises to fire Bernanke, I might be inclined to let him do it.
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4
I can't imagine Mitt would keep Bernanke around, given Bernanke's role in helping Obama juice the economy and all.
brookyone
Deport Right Wing Nuts
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4
And those perplexing varied standards of accountability in the political arena? Is everyone up to speed?
Opie's just being a good little conservative. Clearly what happened 4 years ago (Bush II era) is totally irrelavent, but what happened 32 years ago (Reagan election) is the driving force behind this election.
FlagDUDE08
Banned
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4
Given knucks are calling this Jimmy Carter's second term, why not?
Given knucks are calling this Jimmy Carter's second term, why not?
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4
Which orifice did you pull this one out of? I think it is time to get back on your meds the voices are taking over again Fishy.
Of course I am sure if Romney loses a close one he will step down and make no challenge. and I am sure when he doesnt do that and does challenge you will not be here trumpeting your support for it like the fraud you are
Which orifice did you pull this one out of? I think it is time to get back on your meds the voices are taking over again Fishy.
Of course I am sure if Romney loses a close one he will step down and make no challenge. and I am sure when he doesnt do that and does challenge you will not be here trumpeting your support for it like the fraud you are
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4
are you another one of those people who are congenitally unable to recognize sarcasm and irony?
are you another one of those people who are congenitally unable to recognize sarcasm and irony?
bronconick
Yep, still here
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4
I kind of suspect that a decent chunk of Silver's movement at this point is likely that we're down to 13 days, and every day where polls have it at 50-48 and the swing states similar adds a point to Obama's %. That would put it around ~80% on election day, and if one guy has been consistently down 1.5-2 points, that's pretty reasonable.
I kind of suspect that a decent chunk of Silver's movement at this point is likely that we're down to 13 days, and every day where polls have it at 50-48 and the swing states similar adds a point to Obama's %. That would put it around ~80% on election day, and if one guy has been consistently down 1.5-2 points, that's pretty reasonable.
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4
I'd say your more than just a littlle obsessive here. Let me try explaining it to you, using simple words. I'd recommend taking notes. You profess to be outraged that Romney took advantage of the law, which permitted religious deferrments. My belief is you had no such qualms about Bill Clinton, who got a student deferrment based on his representations to Colonel Holmes that he would attend the University of Arkansas law school and enroll in ROTC. He did neither. Now, if I'm wrong, and you cricized Clinton for his far more outrageous manipulation of the Selective Service System, then I will apologize. Otherwise, why not just admit what a phony you are on this issue and move on?
Not just a troll, but a retarded troll.
I'd say your more than just a littlle obsessive here. Let me try explaining it to you, using simple words. I'd recommend taking notes. You profess to be outraged that Romney took advantage of the law, which permitted religious deferrments. My belief is you had no such qualms about Bill Clinton, who got a student deferrment based on his representations to Colonel Holmes that he would attend the University of Arkansas law school and enroll in ROTC. He did neither. Now, if I'm wrong, and you cricized Clinton for his far more outrageous manipulation of the Selective Service System, then I will apologize. Otherwise, why not just admit what a phony you are on this issue and move on?
Not just a troll, but a retarded troll.
Last edited:
Fighting Sioux 23
New member
Timothy A
Let's go RED!
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4
So I was driving home yesterday listening the the radio, and someone starts interviewing this Virgil Goode fellow who is running for President. When I got home I googled him and he's in line with my views and is similar to Ron Paul, who also falls more in line with my view than Obama and Romney. What other 3rd party candidates are out there?
So I was driving home yesterday listening the the radio, and someone starts interviewing this Virgil Goode fellow who is running for President. When I got home I googled him and he's in line with my views and is similar to Ron Paul, who also falls more in line with my view than Obama and Romney. What other 3rd party candidates are out there?
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4
". . .demonstration." Ladies and gentlemen, the last person in America who thinks what happened in Benghazi was in any way related to a demonstration (over a video, free rubbers or anything else). "'Tis but a scratch."
". . .demonstration." Ladies and gentlemen, the last person in America who thinks what happened in Benghazi was in any way related to a demonstration (over a video, free rubbers or anything else). "'Tis but a scratch."
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4
Says the person who earlier today defended His Truthlessness' lying about Benghazi by bringing up Reagan.
Says the person who earlier today defended His Truthlessness' lying about Benghazi by bringing up Reagan.
- Status