ExileOnDaytonStreet
Drunkard
Too soon?
It's always too soon to **** the kids.
Too soon?
Tease.It's always too soon to **** the kids.
Tease.
In other news, how Nancy Pelosi helped Mitt Romney to help New Gingrich to help Barack Obama to help Nancy Pelosi.
Must admit, when I heard Pelosi's original statement I interpreted it as "yeah, I know something that will prevent Newt from ever being president. I know Newt." But this is a far more fun theory.
Maybe I'm just missing the politician mentality, but I don't get it. Why would Pelosi want Romney over Newt? Or is it some kind of double cross and she actually wants Newt nominated.my head hurts.
Regarding the Republican response...
Two things that the dweeb from Indiana said caught my ear. First off though, could they pick a more weaselly looking guy? I don't agree with Paul Ryan on, well almost anything, but at least he's somewhat charismatic.
Anyway, former Indiana governor said:
"I personally would add to that list admiration for the strong family commitment that he and the first lady have displayed to a nation sorely needing such examples."
Now, I'm FAR from PC but that's kind of a shot at, well, it's kind of like saying about an african-american athlete, "He's surprisingly articulate."
I just was thinking, did he really just say that? Maybe I'm just reading too much into that and he honestly meant it as an example for all Americans and not just African Americans.
You're the first person I've see to construe it as something relating solely to African-Americans. Even if it was, Obama has said much the same thing himself.
"I personally would add to that list admiration for the strong family commitment that he and the first lady have displayed to a nation sorely needing such examples."
Now, I'm FAR from PC but that's kind of a shot at, well, it's kind of like saying about an african-american athlete, "He's surprisingly articulate."
I just was thinking, did he really just say that? Maybe I'm just reading too much into that and he honestly meant it as an example for all Americans and not just African Americans. .
I think its move involved than that! Check it out:
Pelosi says she has the goods on Newtie. Romney jumps on this and publicly asks her to spill the beans (he's already said this in so many words). This sets up a situation where Romney and Pelosi are allies, which allows Newt a perfect foil to rail against (his problem in the last debate, he had nothing to biatch about). Pelosi will then reveal some small transgression (Newt doesn't shower regularly, dislikes dogs, didn't cry during the end of Schindler's list, etc) which will have no real consequences against Gingrich, but is perfect for him to rant against in the next debate. You can see his over the top blathering about a liberal conspiracy against him, but he never expected Romney to take part in it.
Make no mistake, Dems want Newt to win Florida. At the very least it extends the primary into May, and the more people see of these guys the less they like them.
It's a judo move against Romney, and Rover has it described well, above.Maybe I'm just missing the politician mentality, but I don't get it. Why would Pelosi want Romney over Newt? Or is it some kind of double cross and she actually wants Newt nominated.my head hurts.
I have to ask though to my conservative friends out here, are you really on board with Romney being the next President?
The Dems and MSM want Romney to run against Obama, not Newt. Obama has a better chance against a right center guy like Romney. The Dems and MSM also don't want to see Obama have to debate Newt.Maybe I'm just missing the politician mentality, but I don't get it. Why would Pelosi want Romney over Newt? Or is it some kind of double cross and she actually wants Newt nominated.my head hurts.
Let's enumerate your field:This also shows surprising cleverness out of Pelosi that I don't normally associate with Democratic politicians when it comes to taking advantage of their GOP opponents.
I have to ask though to my conservative friends out here, are you really on board with Romney being the next President? I mean, if the guy can't dispatch Newt freakin' Gingrich, how the hell is he supposed to defeat Al Quada? This could be the weakest field for a nomination I've ever seen, as even the 2004 Dems had two sitting Senators, a current governer (I think, not sure when Dean left office) and a retired general. This field has an ex governor who's been out of office for 6 years, an ex senator who got crushed in his re-election 6 years ago by 18 points, an ex House Speaker who resigned 12 years ago after being forced out, and a sitting Congressman who's insane. This race should already be over, as even George W Bush facing the much tougher McCain challenge wasn't facing this much uncertainty by this point.
No. I'm leaning toward not voting this time. Perhaps never again.
The Dems and MSM want Romney to run against Obama, not Newt. Obama has a better chance against a right center guy like Romney. The Dems and MSM also don't want to see Obama have to debate Newt.
Well, right, I'm not going to leave them a cache of millions. But if I die in an accident and I haven't exhausted my cash, I'd rather see my kids and grandchildren get the head start.
This is ****ing idiotic. Obama will get at least 400 electoral votes against Gingrich, probably more.
The idea that Gingrich is a good debater is even stupider. You do realize Obama is under no obligation to agree to a Lincoln-Douglas debate, right? Or for that matter any debate at all. If there are going to be debates, they will likely be in a town hall format. Building a reputation as a good debater by going after John King is one thing, trying to do that in a general election by going after Doris Soandso from Anywhere,USA is going to work just as well, I'm sure.