What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

  • Thread starter Thread starter Priceless
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

And even if they do it'll be to somewhere like South Africa or Germany, not the US or England.

I would think Germany is more in the class with the US or England, but aside from that: They have 5 months. That's a pretty short time table to get $8 billion of publicly funded stadiums built in some poor country.
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

I can't imagine them moving the World Cup out of Brazil, regardless of the problems leading up to the tournament.

Agreed. Blatter has already admitted that there is no "Plan B."

Those hoping for a cup in the USA or England will have to wait until 2026 (USA) or 2034 (England).
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

Agreed. Blatter has already admitted that there is no "Plan B."

Those hoping for a cup in the USA or England will have to wait until 2026 (USA) or 2034 (England).

If Blatter ever did defeat with Brazil, USA and England would be logical choices to be able to host on a short turnaround. Remember, the US did it one year with the Women's World Cup.
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

If Blatter ever did defeat with Brazil, USA and England would be logical choices to be able to host on a short turnaround. Remember, the US did it one year with the Women's World Cup.

The Brazilians have invested way too much money for the Cup to be moved at this point. I believe they would move matches around to other stadia before they would move the Cup to another country.

That being said, I would never question the ability of the US or England to be able to host, even on extremely short notice.

As for the Women's World Cup that was moved, I believe that was primarily done out of fear over SARS in China, IIRC. Also, China got to host the next World Cup.
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

The Brazilians have invested way too much money for the Cup to be moved at this point. I believe they would move matches around to other stadia before they would move the Cup to another country.

Agree. The capacity certainly is there. Perhaps they overreached a bit in building new stadia instead of renovating existing ones? not sure of all the details. Also, if really necessary, they might be able to use a stadium in Uruguay or Argentina if really needed; the travel time to those countries would be no more onerous than traveling to Manaus.
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

Disgraceful.

Paris (AFP) - The 2022 World Cup in Qatar will not be held in June and July but would best be held in the winter time, FIFA general secretary Jerome Valcke said on Wednesday.

The scheduling of the tournament has been hotly debated ever since FIFA controversially awarded it to Qatar in December 2010, especially over fears that the summer heat in the Gulf emirate would be dangerous for players and fans alike.

"The dates for the World Cup (in Qatar) will not be June-July," Valcke, the second most powerful man in international footbal's governing body, told Radio France.

"To be honest, I think it will be held between November 15 and January 15 at the latest.

"If you play between November 15 and the end of December that's the time when the weather conditions are best, when you can play in temperatures equivalent to a warm spring season in Europe, averaging 25 degrees.

"That would be perfect for playing football."

Valcke did not say whether he favoured a World Cup in the winter of 2021-22 or 2022-23, but the deciding factor could be the timing of the Winter Olympics in early 2022.

The awarding of the 2022 World Cup to Qatar has been beset by criticism, especially over the searing heat that bakes the Gulf emirate in the summer when the tournament is traditionally held.

Calls had grown increasingly strident to switch it to the winter time to accomodate players and supporters.

But this ran into opposition from European clubs, who would lose their top players for several weeks in the middle of the season and from the International Olympic Committee fearful of any competition with the 2022 Winter Olympics.

World Cup organising committee officials in Qatar have insisted they were prepared for all eventualities concerning the 2022 showpiece.

"From the beginning, we've always said we can stage the World Cup in summer," said Hassan Al-Thawadi, Secretary General of the Qatar 2022 Organising Committee last month.

"The cooling system for the stadia will be very much part of our legacy. But if the football world or FIFA want it to be staged in the winter then we are happy and ready. If they want it in summer, then we are still ready."

In October FIFA said they would listen to the views of all concerned parties -- players, clubs, leagues, federations and sponsors -- with a view to taking a final decision on dates in December of this year.

It remains to be seen what the reaction to a possible winter World Cup will be from top European clubs such as Barcelona, Real Madrid, Manchester United and Bayern Munich who risk having to do without their top players at a key period for domestic leagues and the Champions League.

jmh I know you love the Qatar World Cup, but this should have been in the US, and if not in the US, it should have been in Australia. Period. Both of those bids were light years ahead of these jokers, and it's a complete disgrace that this was NEVER discussed ahead of the actual bid award.
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

Anyone else think it would be funny to see FIFA and the I.O.C. go at it over Winter 2022 bragging rights?
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

jmh I know you love the Qatar World Cup, but this should have been in the US, and if not in the US, it should have been in Australia. Period. Both of those bids were light years ahead of these jokers, and it's a complete disgrace that this was NEVER discussed ahead of the actual bid award.
I don't love it. I think it's a bad decision for the sport that was almost certainly the result of bribery, covered up by a somewhat plausible cover story. I just don't think it's the result of a conspiracy against the Anglophone world. If Italy had been another bidder and also had not engaged in the bribery that Qatar did, I don't think they'd have gotten it either.
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

I understand the appeal of having America's best playing in the MLS from the MLS perspective but I just don't like it when it comes to the National Team. Opportunities like playing in Serie A, the Bundesliga and EPL don't come along easily and the fact that guys like Dempsey and Bradley are coming home disappoints me. These guys need to be challenging themselves more to compete at a higher level in a top flight league. I understand the belief that these guys will likely see more pressure and minutes by coming home and being some team's savior but the competition is still superior on the other side of the pond.
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

I understand the appeal of having America's best playing in the MLS from the MLS perspective but I just don't like it when it comes to the National Team. Opportunities like playing in Serie A, the Bundesliga and EPL don't come along easily and the fact that guys like Dempsey and Bradley are coming home disappoints me. These guys need to be challenging themselves more to compete at a higher level in a top flight league. I understand the belief that these guys will likely see more pressure and minutes by coming home and being some team's savior but the competition is still superior on the other side of the pond.

The purpose of the MLS was to increase our depth pool and develop players. Its done that. Until the MLS is itself world class (if that were to ever happen) then Europe is the best option
 
The purpose of the MLS was to increase our depth pool and develop players. Its done that. Until the MLS is itself world class (if that were to ever happen) then Europe is the best option
Well how do we make it world class if we just let our best players go to Europe all the time? Sorry but this part of our development as a league, these guys need to play in MLS. Players can continue to develop in MLS, you guys just need to lay off the Eurosnob pipe.
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

The purpose of the MLS was to increase our depth pool and develop players. Its done that. Until the MLS is itself world class (if that were to ever happen) then Europe is the best option
Oh, I completely agree. The MLS is well on its way to being a Tier 2 League. Where do you think MLS would currently rank in UEFA Champions League? Would they get 2 spots? I have to think they're in the range of Turkey, Greece, Switzerland, Austria, Czech domestic leagues? still behind Russia, Netherlands and all the 3/4 spot CL leagues.
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

Well how do we make it world class if we just let our best players go to Europe all the time? Sorry but this part of our development as a league, these guys need to play in MLS. Players can continue to develop in MLS, you guys just need to lay off the Eurosnob pipe.
Its not Eurosnobbery, if someone can get playing time in the top division in England, Italy, Germany, Spain, they should continue to do it...I have no real problem if a player takes the Donovan route and plays in MLS, going on Loan to an EPL team over the MLS offseason. I'm not saying US National players don't belong in the MLS, let alone a guy like Michael Bradley. It will be good for other MLS players to play alongside and against a player of Bradley's caliber. I'm just not sure its the best for Bradley, especially in the lead up to a world cup.

How can you call it eurosnobbery when the best players in the world pretty much all play their prime years somewhere in Europe.
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

Haven't paid attention in a while, but wasn't Bradley seeing decent minutes at Roma?
That was likely to change now that I Lupi have Radja Nainggolan.
Bradley hasn't played much this year, starting because he got hurt about Costa Rica back in early September, but since then because De Rossi, Pjanic and Strootman have all been playing really well in the middle in Roma's 4-3-3 and Bradley just hasn't really had many opportunities to break in. And then add in Nainggolan and he's even less likely to do so. It completely makes sense for Bradley to look elsewhere in order to get playing time leading up to the World Cup (remember Onyewu riding the bench at Milan and how well that worked out four years ago?), but... Toronto? Really? And this means that he won't be playing competitive matches until mid-March instead of right away.

Generally speaking, I'm having a hard time separating my frustration at the fact that he appeared possibly headed to Fulham, who could really use him, from my confusion about what this does for Bradley and the USMNT leading up to the World Cup.
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

What concerns me the most about having our best players in MLS is the heightened risk of injury. the rest of the players here, so far, just aren't as skilled as the average player in Europe. From what I've seen and read, MLS is a rougher league with riskier tackles. I could be wrong, and I don't know if any statistics are available, but anecdotally at least MLS seems a more dangerous place to play compared to Europe, all else being equal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top