What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

World Soccer XX: I paid Jack Warner $1M for the right to start this thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: World Soccer XX: I paid Jack Warner $1M for the right to start this thread

Holy crap, Fulham have a match tomorrow. Like, a real honest-to-god competitive match. Didn't the season just end, like, two weeks ago?
 
Re: World Soccer XX: I paid Jack Warner $1M for the right to start this thread

Wow

What's even more embarassing are the Mexican fans trolling and defending it as "passion" in the article comments. You wanna do that crap in Mexico? Fine. Here, on US soil, you'll comply with our standards for sports fandom - yell all you want, but you don't throw garbage (especially glass, which shouldn't even be allowed inside in the first place), and you don't engage in fights. If you do, you should be thrown out of the venue, regardless of who you're rooting for.

Sounds like a complete security, communication, and logistics failure to me. If the rent-a-cops won't do what they are paid to do, then plan well in advance and bring in law enforcement, who will actually be obligated to protect lives and have the authority to make arrests.

Word!! Stadium security should be as air tight as it normally is for any other event.
 
Re: World Soccer XX: I paid Jack Warner $1M for the right to start this thread

Holy crap, Fulham have a match tomorrow. Like, a real honest-to-god competitive match. Didn't the season just end, like, two weeks ago?

This isn't specifically directed at you, but why do soccer people say "Fulham have a match", yet in other sports it would be "Boston has a game"...
 
Re: World Soccer XX: I paid Jack Warner $1M for the right to start this thread

This isn't specifically directed at you, but why do soccer people say "Fulham have a match", yet in other sports it would be "Boston has a game"...

in either case, I can't imagine the Sox getting out there in January against the Nippon Ham Fighters. Aren't these international friendlies usually played with the B or C team players? Though, yeah, you'd think they get a bit more than their two months off that they usually seem to get... season ends in early may and already having warm up matches in july.

For awhile growing up i had a hard time picking up on when soccer started and ended 'cause it seemed like they were always playing when i looked at the back page of the sports section with all the league tables.
 
Re: World Soccer XX: I paid Jack Warner $1M for the right to start this thread

This isn't specifically directed at you, but why do soccer people say "Fulham have a match", yet in other sports it would be "Boston has a game"...

Replace "Boston" with, "The Red Sox"...
 
Re: World Soccer XX: I paid Jack Warner $1M for the right to start this thread

This isn't specifically directed at you, but why do soccer people say "Fulham have a match", yet in other sports it would be "Boston has a game"...
Same reason they play on a pitch instead of a field and at the start of the game the score is nil-nil. Its the sports terminology.
 
Re: World Soccer XX: I paid Jack Warner $1M for the right to start this thread

Same reason they play on a pitch instead of a field and at the start of the game the score is nil-nil. Its the sports terminology.

It's actually broader than that - it's a British vs. US thing. In the US, we would say "Boeing has decided to build an airplane," while in the UK, it would be "Airbus have decided to build an airplane." Basically, Brits treat all collective nouns (teams, companies, organizations, governmental bodies) as plurals, while in the states we think of them as singular. Brits obviously tend to dominate soccer terminology and commentating, so it's not too surprising that US fans of the Premiership have picked up the usage, but only specifically for soccer.
 
Re: World Soccer XX: I paid Jack Warner $1M for the right to start this thread

It's actually broader than that - it's a British vs. US thing. In the US, we would say "Boeing has decided to build an airplane," while in the UK, it would be "Airbus have decided to build an airplane." Basically, Brits treat all collective nouns (teams, companies, organizations, governmental bodies) as plurals, while in the states we think of them as singular. Brits obviously tend to dominate soccer terminology and commentating, so it's not too surprising that US fans of the Premiership have picked up the usage, but only specifically for soccer.
Of course, Brits would never call it 'soccer'. :D
 
Re: World Soccer XX: I paid Jack Warner $1M for the right to start this thread

It's actually broader than that - it's a British vs. US thing. In the US, we would say "Boeing has decided to build an airplane," while in the UK, it would be "Airbus have decided to build an airplane." Basically, Brits treat all collective nouns (teams, companies, organizations, governmental bodies) as plurals, while in the states we think of them as singular. Brits obviously tend to dominate soccer terminology and commentating, so it's not too surprising that US fans of the Premiership have picked up the usage, but only specifically for soccer.

But of course, this being English, there are exceptions to the exceptions, known as the collective singulars. While you would say, "The Cubs are winning" vs. "Chicago is winning" - there are nicknames like The Big Green which is still treated as singular. So you still say "The Big Green is winning" even though it's a nickname.
 
Re: World Soccer XX: I paid Jack Warner $1M for the right to start this thread

But of course, this being English, there are exceptions to the exceptions, known as the collective singulars. While you would say, "The Cubs are winning" vs. "Chicago is winning" - there are nicknames like The Big Green which is still treated as singular. So you still say "The Big Green is winning" even though it's a nickname.

Are you saying that this is what Americans or Brits would say? I don't think it would be unusual at all to hear "Manchester are winning" or "Arsenal are winning" in the UK - they're consistent in treating the reference to a team as a plural noun, whether the reference is for the team's city or the team's nickname.

(hmm - wonder where Brits put the apostrophe for "team's?" I just automatically treated it as a singular noun and used 's, but if they really think of that as a plural, would they use "teams'?")
 
Re: World Soccer XX: I paid Jack Warner $1M for the right to start this thread

Steve Martin:

"Those French, it's like they have a different word for everything!"

I think we should allow the British to have their quaint sayings and style...what else do they have, besides Royal weddings?;)
 
Re: World Soccer XX: I paid Jack Warner $1M for the right to start this thread

Are you saying that this is what Americans or Brits would say? I don't think it would be unusual at all to hear "Manchester are winning" or "Arsenal are winning" in the UK - they're consistent in treating the reference to a team as a plural noun, whether the reference is for the team's city or the team's nickname.

Well, I suppose mainly in the U.S. - since the Brits tend to treat all references to a team as plural. Though if the team itself considers its nickname singular, I wonder if the British would override the general rule for the specific instance...
 
Re: World Soccer XX: I paid Jack Warner $1M for the right to start this thread

in either case, I can't imagine the Sox getting out there in January against the Nippon Ham Fighters. Aren't these international friendlies usually played with the B or C team players? Though, yeah, you'd think they get a bit more than their two months off that they usually seem to get... season ends in early may and already having warm up matches in july.
Not a friendly, Europa League First Qualifying Round.
 
Re: World Soccer XX: I paid Jack Warner $1M for the right to start this thread

With a dirty mind, the commentary on this Women's World Cup features all sorts of unintentional comedy.

Actual quote: "She keeps coming for balls she can't get."
 
Re: World Soccer XX: I paid Jack Warner $1M for the right to start this thread

BTW, who does Sunil Gulati have to answer to? Anyone?
 
Re: World Soccer XX: I paid Jack Warner $1M for the right to start this thread

Looks like the Canadians remembered their French roots and surrendered nicely to France. :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top