What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

World Soccer XVI: The Sadness

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: World Soccer XVI: The Sadness

Looking back on what was going on here while I was watching the game... please tell me that this wasn't in reference to the non-goal by Argentina when they had no fewer than FOUR players offside...
I think he was talking about another play where Lahm kept an argentina forward onside, it was pretty close but the argentina player was leaning towards goal and lahm was trying to step up...I agree with tba on that one
 
Re: World Soccer XVI: The Sadness

I think I'm rooting for a Netherlands-Germany final as that will be most entertaining, but I honestly wouldn't mind one bit if Uruguay won the whole thing. 3.5 million people and 3 World Cup titles? Impressive.
 
Re: World Soccer XVI: The Sadness

I think he was talking about another play where Lahm kept an argentina forward onside, it was pretty close but the argentina player was leaning towards goal and lahm was trying to step up...I agree with tba on that one

Yeah Lahm got lucky because he was hustling to create the offside trap, the Argentine actually had his back to goal, it looked like his arms were the only part of him offside...it was a harsh decision IMO.
 
Re: World Soccer XVI: The Sadness

Got a link? ;)

Not unless he wants to get banned? :p

Her name is Larissa Riquelme and Google is your friend.

article-1290583-0A2FD6C7000005DC-614_634x469.jpg
 
Last edited:
Re: World Soccer XVI: The Sadness

Is it just me or does it look like TWO Uruguay players handled on that play?

Maybe they should have sent both of them off. :D
 
Re: World Soccer XVI: The Sadness

Is it just me or does it look like TWO Uruguay players handled on that play?

Maybe they should have sent both of them off. :D

The first one tried, but missed. At first I thought he was getting the card, which wouldn't have been right.
 
Re: World Soccer XVI: The Sadness

I think I'm rooting for a Netherlands-Germany final as that will be most entertaining, but I honestly wouldn't mind one bit if Uruguay won the whole thing. 3.5 million people and 3 World Cup titles? Impressive.

Yeah but does anyone really count the first two?
 
Re: World Soccer XVI: The Sadness

Ghana had the best chance to eliminate the Germans. They only needed a draw that last game of Group play. Now they are on a roll.
 
Re: World Soccer XVI: The Sadness

And Larissa is now trending on Twitter :p
 
Re: World Soccer XVI: The Sadness

In 1950, they beat Brazil in the final. In Brazil, in front of 200,000 people.

I'll count that, thank you very much.

Um, I thought they said on the broadcast that the 200k game was only the last game of group play, not the final...
 
Re: World Soccer XVI: The Sadness

Um, I thought they said on the broadcast that the 200k game was only the last game of group play, not the final...

Well, the way it worked back then was that instead of a knockout round, the 4 best teams played a round robin group. The last game of that group was Brazil-Uruguay. So, it was both the last game of the group, and the de facto final.
 
Re: World Soccer XVI: The Sadness

Well, the way it worked back then was that instead of a knockout round, the 4 best teams played a round robin group. The last game of that group was Brazil-Uruguay. So, it was both the last game of the group, and the de facto final.

huh... Apparently that was the only year they did that. Weird.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top