What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Women's DIII 2010-2011 Fan Opinion Poll

Re: Women's DIII 2010-2011 Fan Opinion Poll

1. Amherst
2. RIT
3. Norwich
4. Plattsburgh
5. Middlebury
6. Elmira
7. River Falls
8. Gustavus
9. Trinity
10. Manhattanville

Pretty much the same as spike, but I had to move RIT ahead of Norwich based on this past weekend.
 
Re: Women's DIII 2010-2011 Fan Opinion Poll

This is the poll I submitted to the USCHO.com weekly poll.

1.Amherst
2.R.I.T.
3.Norwich
4.Plattsburgh
5.Gustavus Adolphus
6.River Falls
7.Elmira
8.Middlebury
9.Lake Forest
10.Manhattanville
 
Re: Women's DIII 2010-2011 Fan Opinion Poll

Here is the official Preseason Poll.

USCHO.com Division III Women's Poll
Minneapolis, Minn./November 1, 2010

Team (First Place) Record Pts Last Year
1 Amherst (13) 23-2-4 148 1
2 Plattsburgh ( 1) 23-3-2 119 3
3 RIT ( 1) 19-5-3 110 7
4 Norwich 20-6-5 82 10
5 Gustavus Adolphus 22-6-2 81 6
6 Wisconsin-River Falls 20-4-6 80 4
7 Elmira 24-5-1 64 2
8 Middlebury 16-7-3 57 9
9 Trinity 21-5-2 30 5
10 Manhattanville 19-7-1 24 NR

Others Receiving Votes: Lake Forest 16,
Wisconsin-Stevens Point 7, Wisconsin-Superior 6,
Utica 1

The USCHO.com Poll is compiled weekly and consists of 15 voters, including 14 coaches of Division III programs and one women's hockey writer. USCHO.com provides in-depth coverage of college hockey.
 
Re: Women's DIII 2010-2011 Fan Opinion Poll

1. Amherst
2. RIT
3. Platty
4. Norwich
5. M'Ville
6. Elmira
7. Trinity
8. Gustavus
9. UWRF
10.Middlebury
 
Re: Women's DIII 2010-2011 Fan Opinion Poll

1) Amherst
2) RIT
3) Plattsburgh
4) Wisconsin-River Falls
5) Norwich
6) Middlebury
7) Gustavus Adolphus
8) Manhattanville
9) Elmira
10) Trinity
 
Re: Women's DIII 2010-2011 Fan Opinion Poll

1. Amherst
2. RIT
3. Norwich
4. Plattsburgh
5. Middlebury
6. Elmira
7. River Falls
8. Gustavus
9. Trinity
10. Manhattanville

Pretty much the same as spike, but I had to move RIT ahead of Norwich based on this past weekend.

Yeah, I thought about putting RIT ahead of Norwich based on head to head but I guess I'm allowing for first game jitters. My bad.
 
Re: Women's DIII 2010-2011 Fan Opinion Poll

1) Amherst
2) RIT
3) PLattsburgh
4) Elmira
5) Adrian
6) Norwich
7) Middlebury
8) River Falls
9) Gustavus
10) Lake Forest
 
Re: Women's DIII 2010-2011 Fan Opinion Poll

1. Amherst
2. RIT
3. Gustavus
4. River Falls
5. Norwich
6. Lake Forest
7. Superior
8. Elmira
9. Manhattanville
10. Neumann
 
Last edited:
Re: Women's DIII 2010-2011 Fan Opinion Poll

1) Amherst
2) RIT
3) Plattsburgh
4) Norwich
5) Middlebury
6) Manhattanville
7) Gustavus Adolphus
8) Wisconsin-River Falls
9) Elmira
10) Trinity
 
Re: Women's DIII 2010-2011 Fan Opinion Poll

Based only on teams which have played. I know a lot of big names are missing and they will be included as soon as they start playing

1. RIT
2. Lake Forrest
3. UWSP
4. St Mary
5. Concordia Mn
6. Utica
7. Adrian
8. Norwich
9. Elmira
10. Oswego
 
Re: Women's DIII 2010-2011 Fan Opinion Poll

Based only on teams which have played. I know a lot of big names are missing and they will be included as soon as they start playing

1. RIT
2. Lake Forrest
3. UWSP
4. St Mary
5. Concordia Mn
6. Utica
7. Adrian
8. Norwich
9. Elmira
10. Oswego

Interesting way of doing things. I like it actually.
 
Re: Women's DIII 2010-2011 Fan Opinion Poll

that AZ heat really turned you into quite the comedian :rolleyes:

I did change it a little. I thought Norwich had beaten RIT...so fixed that. Other than that...Gustavus and RF are the best in the west right now...Manhattanville is always overrated, Elmira and Norwich have losses...and 10 is a crapshoot so might as well be Neumann :) plus that a joke Oh I also don't give Middlebury credit, just because their name is Middlebury. They didn't do much last year, so until they do something this year...they don't belong. And again...is Trinity better than Superior? I don't know. They both have big goalie questions if I'm not mistaken.

I suppose I forgot Platty...but oh well...maybe I'll be right!
 
Last edited:
Re: Women's DIII 2010-2011 Fan Opinion Poll

I did change it a little. I thought Norwich had beaten RIT...so fixed that. Other than that...Gustavus and RF are the best in the west right now...Manhattanville is always overrated, Elmira and Norwich have losses...and 10 is a crapshoot so might as well be Neumann :) plus that a joke Oh I also don't give Middlebury credit, just because their name is Middlebury. They didn't do much last year, so until they do something this year...they don't belong. And again...is Trinity better than Superior? I don't know. They both have big goalie questions if I'm not mistaken.

I suppose I forgot Platty...but oh well...maybe I'll be right!

Careful when you talk about Middlebury not doing anything last year; you could be describing River Falls.
 
Re: Women's DIII 2010-2011 Fan Opinion Poll

Careful when you talk about Middlebury not doing anything last year; you could be describing River Falls.

River falls made the NCAA's last year didn't they?

If say Potsdam had played the exact same schedule as Middlebury last year with the exact same results, would you even consider putting Potsdam in your poll?
 
Re: Women's DIII 2010-2011 Fan Opinion Poll

I did change it a little. I thought Norwich had beaten RIT...so fixed that. Other than that...Gustavus and RF are the best in the west right now...Manhattanville is always overrated, Elmira and Norwich have losses...and 10 is a crapshoot so might as well be Neumann :) plus that a joke Oh I also don't give Middlebury credit, just because their name is Middlebury. They didn't do much last year, so until they do something this year...they don't belong. And again...is Trinity better than Superior? I don't know. They both have big goalie questions if I'm not mistaken.

I suppose I forgot Platty...but oh well...maybe I'll be right!

I truthfully don't disagree with much on your poll, with the possible exception of Lake Forest, but I guess that's still a toss-up, and the fact that you obviously forgot platty. I happen to agree with you that Trinity has little to no business being ahead of a team like superior. I had the jackets No. 7 in my preseason poll. And I also happen to agree with you ab Middlebury, but I can't completely justify having them out of the poll entirely with at least being competitive last year. I know it didn't exactly show in the W-L-T and all, but they at least kept games close. I don't know if the Potsdam comparison is really a fair one because we all know that Potsdam wouldn't have played the top teams close at all, either in terms of shots or goals allowed throughout the season.
 
Re: Women's DIII 2010-2011 Fan Opinion Poll

your missing the point. If it had occurred exactly the same way as Middlebury did. You wouldn't consider putting Potsdam in the top 10, because they are Potsdam...but since Middlebury did it, they get in the top 10
 
Re: Women's DIII 2010-2011 Fan Opinion Poll

your missing the point. If it had occurred exactly the same way as Middlebury did. You wouldn't consider putting Potsdam in the top 10, because they are Potsdam...but since Middlebury did it, they get in the top 10

No I get it. All I said was a can't COMPLETELY justify Midd not being in the top-10, again, because they played teams close and weren't a rollover all year. I don't disagree with what you're saying in any way. I just think its just as justifiable to have them in the top-10 as to not have them in the top-10.
 
Back
Top