What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

1) Plattsburgh
2) Amherst
3) Elmira
4) RIT
5) Lake Forest
6) Manhattanville
7) Middlebury
8) Trinity
9) Wisconsin-River Falls
10) Gustavus Adolphus
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

1) Plattsburgh
2) Amherst
3) Elmira
4) Manhattanville
5) Lake Forest
6) Middlebury
7) RIT
8) Trinity
9) UWRF
10) St.Catherine's
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

1. Plattsburgh
2. Amherst
3. Elmira
4. Lake Forest
5. Manhattanville
6. UWRF
7. Trinity
8. Gustavus
9. RIT
10. Midd
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

Official Fan Poll

1 Platty
2 Trinity
3 Lake Forest
4 St Kate
5 Amherst
6 Elmira
7 M'Ville
8 UWRF
9 GAC
10 UWSP
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

1) Plattsburg
2) Elmira
3) Amherst
4) Lake Forest
5) M'Ville
6) St Kates
7) Midd
8) Trinity
9) UWRF
10) RIT
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

UNOFFICIAL BERRY PATCH POLL:D

Averaging the combined average winning % against teams at .500 or better and their overall seasonal winning %

1 Platty .889
2 Trinity .775
3 L. Forest .754
4 St Kate .740
5 Amherst .738
6 Elmira .701
7 M'Ville .700
8 UWRF .647
9 Middle .647
10 GAC .634
Holy Cross .604
11 UMass .583
12 RIT .571
13 St Thom .556
14 UWSP .550
15 Norwich .550
16 St Olaf .540
17 Adrian .533
18 Conc Mn .515
19 UWS .493
St Anselm .485
20 Williams .463
21 St Mary .458
22 Neumann .443
23 UWEC .399
24 Salve .393
25 Bowdein .278

everyone else is below .500
sorry if I left anyone out
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

i don't see how Middlebury can be anything above 10. The argument all along is that they haven't lost to anyone below them...now they have...drop em like their hot!

Keeping both Middlebury and RIT in the top ten? It's kind of like going to the funeral of a loved one. You hate to let them go because you're not ready for them to be gone. But you cry and soon realize that they are gone and that it's ok:D
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

1: Plattsburgh
2: Elmira
3: Amherst
4: RIT
5: River Falls
6: Lake Forrest
7: Manhattanville
8: Middlebury
9: Trinity
10: Gustavus Adolphus
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

USCHO Poll is out. What one would reasonably expect....


USCHO.com Division III Women's Poll
February 8, 2010

Team (First Place Votes) Record Points Last Poll
1 Plattsburgh (15) 17-1-1 150 1
2 Amherst 15-2-4 133 2
3 Elmira 16-4-1 119 3
4 RIT 13-4-3 95 4
5 Trinity 15-3-2 71 6
6 Wis.-River Falls 13-3-4 70 7
7 Lake Forest 15-2-2 45 9
7 Middlebury 13-5-1 45 5
9 Manhattanville 15-4-1 44 8
10 Gustavus Adolphus 12-4-2 33 10
Others Receiving Votes: Adrian 8, St. Thomas 6, Wis.-Stevens Point 2, Neumann 1, St. Catherine 1, St. Olaf 1, Wis.-Superior 1
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

USCHO Poll is out. What one would reasonably expect....


USCHO.com Division III Women's Poll
February 8, 2010

Team (First Place Votes) Record Points Last Poll
1 Plattsburgh (15) 17-1-1 150 1
2 Amherst 15-2-4 133 2
3 Elmira 16-4-1 119 3
4 RIT 13-4-3 95 4
5 Trinity 15-3-2 71 6
6 Wis.-River Falls 13-3-4 70 7
7 Lake Forest 15-2-2 45 9
7 Middlebury 13-5-1 45 5
9 Manhattanville 15-4-1 44 8
10 Gustavus Adolphus 12-4-2 33 10
Others Receiving Votes: Adrian 8, St. Thomas 6, Wis.-Stevens Point 2, Neumann 1, St. Catherine 1, St. Olaf 1, Wis.-Superior 1

interesting that Lake Forest jumps Manhattanville
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

1 Plattsburgh
2 Elmira
3 Amherst
4 RIT
5 Middlebury
6 Trinity
7 Manhattanville
8 Gustavus Adol.
9 Wis-River Falls
10 Lake Forrest
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

Just for fun....A little something I'd like to call the Mania Rating
Does it make any sense? I don't know, but I was bored...

X = Win against teams over .500
Y = Losses against teams under .500
Z = Win %
(((X-Y)/(X+Y))+(.10(X-Y))+(Rutter Rating)+(RPI))

1 Plattsburgh 4.9023
2 Elmira 4.5021
3 Amherst 4.0668
4 RIT 3.9216
5 Trinity 3.6967
6 Middlebury 3.6878
7 Wis-River Falls 3.5845
8 Lake Forest 3.4442
9 Manhattanville 3.4013
10 Gustavus Adolphus 3.0294
11 Norwich 2.8598
12 St. Catherine 2.6211
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

1. Platty
2. Elmira
3. Amherst
4. UWRF
5. RIT
6. M'ville
7. Midd
8. LF
9. Trinity
10. GAC

P.S. - I'm glad to see at least the people on the fan opinion poll recognized Trinity losing to Middlebury and Williams. The USCHO pollsters seem to have forgotten as per the poll this week. Move up one spot after beating Nichols? Elmira should therefore be No. 1 for beating Buff. State, clearly.
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

1. Platty
2. Elmira
3. Amherst
4. UWRF
5. RIT
6. M'ville
7. Midd
8. LF
9. Trinity
10. GAC

P.S. - I'm glad to see at least the people on the fan opinion poll recognized Trinity losing to Middlebury and Williams. The USCHO pollsters seem to have forgotten as per the poll this week. Move up one spot after beating Nichols? Elmira should therefore be No. 1 for beating Buff. State, clearly.

Clearly.....:)
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

Team
1 Plattsburgh 17-1-1
2 Amherst 15-2-4
3 Elmira 16-4-1
4 Wis.-River Falls 13-3-4
5 RIT 13-4-3
6 Lake Forest 15-2-2
7 Middlebury 13-5-1
8 Gustavus Adolphus 12-4-2
9 Trinity 15-3-2
10 Manhattanville 15-4-1

ECAC West
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

Just for fun....A little something I'd like to call the Mania Rating
Does it make any sense? I don't know, but I was bored...

X = Win against teams over .500
Y = Losses against teams under .500
Z = Win %
(((X-Y)/(X+Y))+(.10(X-Y))+(Rutter Rating)+(RPI))

1 Plattsburgh 4.9023
2 Elmira 4.5021
3 Amherst 4.0668
4 RIT 3.9216
5 Trinity 3.6967
6 Middlebury 3.6878
7 Wis-River Falls 3.5845
8 Lake Forest 3.4442
9 Manhattanville 3.4013
10 Gustavus Adolphus 3.0294
11 Norwich 2.8598
12 St. Catherine 2.6211




What happened to Z
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

P.S. - I'm glad to see at least the people on the fan opinion poll recognized Trinity losing to Middlebury and Williams. The USCHO pollsters seem to have forgotten as per the poll this week.

Middlebury lost to Hamilton :eek:
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

Middlebury lost to Hamilton :eek:

Amherst lost to Colby:eek: yet we both have Amherst No. 3 with two teams ahead of them that they are 2-1-0 against on the season. So every team that now beats Colby is a quality team? And Trinity lost to Williams, a team with one less tie and two more wins than Hamilton. We're not talking the difference between No. 1 and No. 47 here.
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

Amherst lost to Colby:eek: yet we both have Amherst No. 3 with two teams ahead of them that they are 2-1-0 against on the season. So every team that now beats Colby is a quality team? And Trinity lost to Williams, a team with one less tie and two more wins than Hamilton. We're not talking the difference between No. 1 and No. 47 here.

Your post is quite confusing, maybe it is because it is early in the morning...I don't know.

Lets take a look though. Yes Amherst did lose to Colby (who has a .275 win %). However, they have wins against RIT, Plattsburgh, and Elmira. Middlebury lost to Hamilton...However, they have wins against...well Trinity. Trinisty lost to Williams (a so-so team)....However, they have beat...well I guess Middlebury.

I'm not sure what you are trying to infer with the Colby comment. I never suggested they were a good team. I am suggesting that Middlebury and Trinity should both be moved down, because they haven't really beat anyone good except each other...which doesn't really prove much.

This does weaken my case for RIT because they haven't beaten anyone "good" either, however they haven't lost to anyone "bad"...unlike some other teams.
 
Back
Top