What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

1. Amherst - Until they give a reason to not be there.
2. Plattsburgh - Two wins against Elmira. Can't deny them. Not a homer move.
3. Elmira - Still close games. Just a step behind.
4. Middlebury - By default. Dominant weekend.
5. River-Falls - Neutral. Weird week for them. Went out on a high note with the win over Superior Saturday.
6. Gustavus - Not the best looking week for the team who's supposed to be the western front-runner.
7. RIT - 17-1 doesn't impress me. I refuse to move them anywhere.
8. Lake Forest - Keep on rolling.
9. Norwich - Lake Forest has played tougher teams to this point.
10. Manhattanville - Lots of goals. Now let's seem 'em against Elmira this weekend.

Check out the latest post! http://d3women.blogspot.com/
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

1) Amherst
2) Plattsburgh
3) Middlebury
4) Wisconsin-River Falls
5) Elmira
6) Lake Forest
7) Norwich
8) Wisconsin-Superior
9) Gustavus Adolphus
10) Neumann
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

1. Gustavus
2. Amherst
3. Middlebury
4. Plattsburg
5. RIT
6. Manhattenville
7. Neumann
8. River-Falls
9. Norwich
10. Elmira
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

RIT - 17-1 doesn't impress me. I refuse to move them anywhere.

Give me a break, this is college hockey not tiddly winks.

If this was little girls playing pewee hockey or whatever they call it then yeah you have reason to be upset about running up the score. This isn't though, this is college hockey suck it up or switch to figure skating.
 
Last edited:
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

Give me a break, this is college hockey not tiddly winks.

If this was little girls playing pewee hockey or whatever they call it then yeah you have reason to be upset about running up the score. This isn't though, this is college hockey suck it up or switch to figure skating.


1 Amherst (13) 2-0-0 146 1
2 Plattsburgh ( 1) 4-0-0 135 4
3 Elmira 3-2-0 102 2
3 Middlebury 2-0-0 102 6
5 Gustavus Adolphus ( 1) 2-1-1 80 3
6 Wis.-River Falls 4-1-1 76 5
7 RIT 3-0-1 68 7
8 Norwich 7-0-0 36 8
9 Wis.-Superior 3-3-1 25 NR
10 Lake Forest 7-0-1 24 10

Funny, no one else was impressed either. Hmm...
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

Funny, no one else was impressed either. Hmm...

I could care less about the rankings. Move them up, move them down, keep them where they are, doesn't matter to me. But if you "penalize" a team because you don't like how many goals they scored on someone that is just stupid.
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

1 Amherst (13) 2-0-0 146 1
2 Plattsburgh ( 1) 4-0-0 135 4
3 Elmira 3-2-0 102 2
3 Middlebury 2-0-0 102 6
5 Gustavus Adolphus ( 1) 2-1-1 80 3
6 Wis.-River Falls 4-1-1 76 5
7 RIT 3-0-1 68 7
8 Norwich 7-0-0 36 8
9 Wis.-Superior 3-3-1 25 NR
10 Lake Forest 7-0-1 24 10

Funny, no one else was impressed either. Hmm...

No one else is impressed because they have played Neumann and Potsdam. The test for RIT is in 3 weeks when they travel to Amherst for a pair.
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

No one else is impressed because they have played Neumann and Potsdam. The test for RIT is in 3 weeks when they travel to Amherst for a pair.

I couldn't agree more. It's fine and all that they scored 17 goals even though they were just dumping pucks in and not actually trying to score. Still doesn't mean I should be impressed. Mania, you're saying its not college tiddly winks, well obviously it is if they can score just by dumping pucks in like all you RITers are saying.
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

Opinion Poll for Tuesday 11-24-09

1. Amherst
2. Middlebury
3. Plattsburgh
4. Elmira
5. Newmann
6. RIT
7. Gustavus
8. UW River Falls
9. Norwich
10. Manhattanville
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

1 Amherst (13) 2-0-0 146 1
2 Plattsburgh ( 1) 4-0-0 135 4
3 Elmira 3-2-0 102 2
3 Middlebury 2-0-0 102 6
5 Gustavus Adolphus ( 1) 2-1-1 80 3
6 Wis.-River Falls 4-1-1 76 5
7 RIT 3-0-1 68 7
8 Norwich 7-0-0 36 8
9 Wis.-Superior 3-3-1 25 NR
10 Lake Forest 7-0-1 24 10

Funny, no one else was impressed either. Hmm...

This is an interesting poll....I'm curious who gave Gustavus a first place vote despite going 0-1-1 against NCHA opponents...and barely gettin by Bethel game 2. Also that Superior jumps Lake Forest who they went 0-1-1 against
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

1.Amherst
2.Plattsburgh
3.Middlebury
4.Norwich
5.Lake Forest
6.River Falls
7.Elmira
8.RIT
9.Neumann
10.Stevens Point
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

This is an interesting poll....I'm curious who gave Gustavus a first place vote despite going 0-1-1 against NCHA opponents...and barely gettin by Bethel game 2. Also that Superior jumps Lake Forest who they went 0-1-1 against

Yeah...That's why I had a hard time cracking Superior into the T-10.
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

I couldn't agree more. It's fine and all that they scored 17 goals even though they were just dumping pucks in and not actually trying to score. Still doesn't mean I should be impressed. Mania, you're saying its not college tiddly winks, well obviously it is if they can score just by dumping pucks in like all you RITers are saying.

I could care less about RIT but I agree with Mania. College hockey. Suck it up or get off the ice.
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

This is an interesting poll....I'm curious who gave Gustavus a first place vote despite going 0-1-1 against NCHA opponents...and barely gettin by Bethel game 2. Also that Superior jumps Lake Forest who they went 0-1-1 against

I'm not sure why anyone would give Gustavus a first place vote given the start to their season. If they would have beat Superior they would remain in my top 3. As for the second game against Bethel, they had a different goalie in who was actually quite good. Jones made numerous great saves in this game and the shots Gustavus took were not the usual half of them from the point, most of them were fairly quality. Credit to Jones. As for Superior jumping Lake Forest, the only way I can see that happening is that Superior has beaten better teams, but they have also lost to a few "not so good" teams, which is why I still have Lake Forest above Superior. I am looking forward to Jan 26th, Superior @ Gustavus. I am pretty sure the result will be different. :)
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

Fan Opinion Poll Tuesday 11-24-09

Rank | Team | (1st Votes) Total Pts | Previous Rank

1. Amherst (12) 129 1
2. Plattsburgh 113 4
3. Middlebury 96 7
4. Elmira 79 2
5. River Falls 77 5
6. Lake Forest 48 10
7. RIT 46 6
8. Norwich 43 8
9. Gustavus (1) 30 3
10. Neumann 22 9


Superior 19, Manhattanville 11, Oswego 1, Stevens Point 1

13 voted this week, 9 voted last week
 
Re: Women's DIII 2009-2010 Fan Opinion Poll

Can anyone explain the BTD poll showing Elmira 2nd this week? Ahead of the team that beat them twice. Makes absolutely no sense and making the BTD poll kind of a joke!!

http://www.beyondthedashers.com/Full/Polls.html

I'm guessing it has something to do with them being screwed over and getting 0 of the stars from Plattsburgh and people were mad that RIT put up 17 on Potty.


That is a wierd turnout...I wonder how much attention the pollsters pay to D3. It looks like they didn't give Platty much credit before this weekend...Elmira lost 6 first place votes from the week before.
 
Back
Top