What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Wisconsin Women's Hockey 2025-2026

Did UMD challenge the tying goal for offsides? Because am 100% certain that they had called their timeout earlier, after an icing; I saw the ref signal timeout and put to the UMD bench when that happened. It's moot, of course, but that final 21 seconds after Harvey's goal should have been 5-on-3 (with McNaughton back in goal), instead of 5-on-4. I think the refs screwed that up.
 
robertearle said:
Did UMD challenge the tying goal for offsides? Because am 100% certain that they had called their timeout earlier, after an icing; I saw the ref signal timeout and put to the UMD bench when that happened. It's moot, of course, but that final 21 seconds after Harvey's goal should have been 5-on-3 (with McNaughton back in goal), instead of 5-on-4. I think the refs screwed that up.
Click to expand...
I thought the same thing - but thought maybe they gave the TO back, or didn't charge them the TO when Wisconsin Challenged for the major? Doesn't make sense, but that's the only thing I can think of - because yes - I was pretty sure it was TO called by UMD too.
 
Windchill22 said:
I thought the same thing - but thought maybe they gave the TO back, or didn't charge them the TO when Wisconsin Challenged for the major? Doesn't make sense, but that's the only thing I can think of - because yes - I was pretty sure it was TO called by UMD too.
Click to expand...
Unless the refs "initiated" the offsides review on their own. Assuming they can do that.
 
Apart from the final score, this was a dissatisfying outcome in terms of both officiating quality and the condition of players coming back from "practice" in Blaine. I wouldn't dampen anyone's Olympic ambitions but the way this is playing out is baloney.
 
robertearle said:
Did UMD challenge the tying goal for offsides? Because am 100% certain that they had called their timeout earlier, after an icing; I saw the ref signal timeout and put to the UMD bench when that happened. It's moot, of course, but that final 21 seconds after Harvey's goal should have been 5-on-3 (with McNaughton back in goal), instead of 5-on-4. I think the refs screwed that up.
Click to expand...
They did challenge an offsides.
 
robertearle said:
Booo

ix weeks would be "just in time for Ohio State". Wait a week longer, and you can give her all the way into January.
Click to expand...
Most likely no need for that long, typically the MCL heals pretty quickly. All depends upon how much stability is in the knee since it's a grade 2 sprain. 4-6 weeks max is a pretty good time table. Really depends upon the knee responding to rehab.
 
JDHack51 said:
Most likely no need for that long, typically the MCL heals pretty quickly. All depends upon how much stability is in the knee since it's a grade 2 sprain. 4-6 weeks max is a pretty good time table. Really depends upon the knee responding to rehab.
Click to expand...
My point is that if there is the slightest doubt, "missing two more games" buys you an additional month.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top