What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Wisconsin Women's Hockey 2024-2025

Oh my that was painful to listen to MJ sing.

I would bet the B1g put the screws to OSU and Wisconsin's ADs to make it happen even if there isn't a women's hockey league. The only other choice was a Gopher vs. Penn St. match up. ;)

If McIntosh was unable to resist that pressure, it would be another sign of what a weak AD he is. What has he done that makes you say, "Wow, what a great job this guy's doing!" Expensive beer in the stands? Metal detectors to enter LaBahn? Shrinking the ice sheet at the Kohl Center to the size of a postage stamp? None of the above is more like it.

There would be far less downside to a Rodent-They Are women's hockey matchup. Plus, those teams and their fans deserve the punishment more than we do. Or how about a marquee matchup between the UofM-MSU club teams?
 
Last edited:
The players all seemed to get a lifelong memory out of it, and the friends of mine who went all seemed to really enjoy it. I don't have a problem with the game; I have a problem with it being a standard WCHA game.

In my opinion, they need to add another exemption to Section 17.14.5.3 of the NCAA Manual. They already have exemptions to the total number of allowable contests for the Hockey Hall of Fame Game, the Icebreaker Tournament, as well as a wealth of others.

17.14.5.3 Annual Exemptions. The maximum number of ice hockey contests shall exclude the following:
(a) Conference Championship. Competition in one conference championship tournament in ice hockey (or the tournament used to determine the conference's automatic entry in an NCAA ice hockey championship);
(b) Conference Playoff. Competition involving member institutions that tie for a conference championship. Such teams may participate in a single-elimination playoff to determine the conference's automatic entry in an NCAA ice hockey championship without the game(s) being counted as a postseason tournament;
(c) NCAA Championship Play-In Competition. Competition in play-in contests conducted before NCAA championships;
(d) Season-Ending Event. Competition in one season-ending event (e.g., NCAA championship). A season-ending event involves competition after the end of the regular season between teams that are not identified until the close of the regular season;
(e) Alumni Game. One ice hockey contest each year against an alumni team of the institution;
(f) Foreign Team in the United States. One ice hockey contest each year with a foreign opponent in the United States;
(g) Hall of Fame Game. The one ice hockey game between two Division I intercollegiate teams conducted by the U.S. Hockey Hall of Fame;
(h) U.S. Olympic or Paralympic Team. One ice hockey contest each year against the U.S. Olympic or Paralympic ice hockey team during that team's training for participation in the Winter Olympics;
(i) Hawaii or Alaska. Any games played in Hawaii or Alaska, respectively, against an active Division I member institution located in Hawaii or Alaska, by a member located outside the area in question;
(j) Fundraising Activity. Any ice hockey activities in which student-athletes from more than one of the institution's athletics teams participate with and against alumni and friends of the institution, the purpose of which is to raise funds for the benefit of the institution's athletics or other programs, provided the student-athletes do not miss classes as a result of their participation (see Bylaw 12.5.1.1);
(k) Celebrity Sports Activity. Competition involving a limit of two student-athletes from a member institution's ice hockey team who participate in local celebrity ice hockey activities conducted for the purpose of raising funds for charitable organizations, provided: (1) The student-athletes do not miss classes as a result of the participation; (2) The involvement of the student-athletes has the approval of the institution's athletics director; and (3) The activity takes place within a 30-mile radius of the institution's main campus.
(l) U.S. National Team. One game played against any team as selected and designated by the appropriate national governing body for ice hockey as a U.S. national team (e.g., "Under-21" U.S. national team);
and (m) Hockey Commissioners Association/Ice Breaker Tournaments. Competition in the men's or women's Ice Breaker Tournament sponsored by the Hockey Commissioners Association.
(n) Scrimmage/Exhibition Contest. One ice hockey scrimmage or exhibition contest each year against outside competition.

That's a lot of exemptions already, so let's dial up another one and add (o) one outdoor ice hockey contest

If you're going to have a game played on a massively substandard surface for the almost sole purpose of promoting the sport, give it an exemption and leave the games that count where they should be.

Count me among those who attended and greatly enjoyed the event. I also believe that Badger Pete has it right. Give the participating teams an exemption to play these games as non-conference exhibitions.

Thinking out loud, I might limit the exemption to one usage every 3 or 4 years. Still, in a perfect world, every D-1 player would get an opportunity to participate in an outdoor game. IMHO.
 
Anyone know if they are expecting to auction off the game worn jerseys or have them available for retail from the weekend?
 
I won’t try to dissuade you guys but I honestly thought it was iconic for women's hockey.

Totally agree on "iconic for women's hockey."

First, the venue. Although I'm not a Cubs fan, my Dad and most of the relatives from his side of the family are. It was just plain awesome to hold the event there. Along with Fenway, Wrigley is one of the most special baseball places, if not one of the most special places in all of sports. As such, we were reaching out to all MLB fans, if not all sports fans.

Beyond that, I'll keep my attempts to "dissuade" to a minimum. But for those who are baffled, just baffled -- let me ask you this: Have you ever played on outdoor ice? It's hockey in the purest form. I'll bet the large majority of the D-1 players experienced outdoor hockey growing up. It's heaven. No coaches, no whistles. Usually no adults. Just you and your friends playing as creatively as you like.

And it really isn't all that cold if you're playing. Feeling a little cold? Just skate harder! I'll certainly grant that watching or coaching outdoor hockey is a deep freeze experience. I just had that experience last weekend. (winking emoji here) But for a player, those times are the best of memories; whether you grew up to be a D-1 player or a rec league wonder. It doesn't surprise me in the least that the D-1 players cherish the opportunity to create outdoor memories with their current teammates.
 
Nela is leading the U18 tournament in scoring through the prelims.

Nela deserves every ounce of the hype she's getting, but from that same 26-27 class Haley Box looks incredibly good as well from the US games I've been able to catch on vague European TV. Super skilled and super smooth. Those two are both going to be powerhouses.
 
Nela deserves every ounce of the hype she's getting, but from that same 26-27 class Haley Box looks incredibly good as well from the US games I've been able to catch on vague European TV. Super skilled and super smooth. Those two are both going to be powerhouses.

Yeah the Boxster had 2 goals today. I'm dying to know how well Nela would do on a deep team like the USA or Canada. I believe she's scored a point on every goal her team has scored.
 
Yeah the Boxster had 2 goals today. I'm dying to know how well Nela would do on a deep team like the USA or Canada. I believe she's scored a point on every goal her team has scored.

this is the appeal of the PWHL.

you start to get an idea.
 
this is the appeal of the PWHL.

you start to get an idea.

The converse is true too. You see staples on Team Canada and USA that pile up stats in intl play against Khazakstan not fare (fair? I can’t remember) so well in the ‘ol PW.
 
this is the appeal of the PWHL. You start to get an idea.

We'll get an idea when she's here for sure. I think the PWHL is too deep right now. They need expansion so the talent level from the 1st line to the 3rd line is a bit wider and wider from team to team. That is suppressing scoring. I don't want to see any more gimmicks in that league.
 
I did not get to watch the outdoor game intently as we were entertaining guests. I am much troubled by giving up that many sog. I may re-watch it to see what was going on.
 
We'll get an idea when she's here for sure. I think the PWHL is too deep right now. They need expansion so the talent level from the 1st line to the 3rd line is a bit wider and wider from team to team. That is suppressing scoring. I don't want to see any more gimmicks in that league.

Yes 2 more teams would be great
 
Ludwig was involved and the officiating was suspect? Correlation does not imply causation except when, you know, Ludwig was involved.

Game 1 TWSNBN had 3 pp's and 2 sog. Game 2 they had 5 pp's and 11 sog. The pk was effective as they were 100% for the weekend, but in game one they allowed .66 shots per pp and in game 2 they allowed 2.20 shots per pp, a huge difference I will try and watch the game tonight, there's nothing else I'd rather watch.

I'm torn on whether or not to go the game Sunday with the Packers playing at the same time. They'll likely get torched, but it is the playoffs. I'll miss attending the Saturday game; I'm going with my oldest to look at some properties in Rhinelander. I'll watch when I get home.
 
Game 1 TWSNBN had 3 pp's and 2 sog. Game 2 they had 5 pp's and 11 sog. The pk was effective as they were 100% for the weekend, but in game one they allowed .66 shots per pp and in game 2 they allowed 2.20 shots per pp, a huge difference I will try and watch the game tonight, there's nothing else I'd rather watch.

I'm torn on whether or not to go the game Sunday with the Packers playing at the same time. They'll likely get torched, but it is the playoffs. I'll miss attending the Saturday game; I'm going with my oldest to look at some properties in Rhinelander. I'll watch when I get home.

Unless you're in Rhinelander, wait until the Packers get torched to look at properties. No one wants to get properties ready for showings while Packers games are still going on. You'll have more to look at after this weekend.

As for the hockey game - yes, this forum is about hockey, The Podkaz danced around the ice conditions and officiating. Nonetheless, my takeaway is that the event was a joke unless it was classified as a scrimmage or exhibition - which it wasn't - and, best case, the Badgers should chalk it up as a learning experience that has nothing to do with what they'll see for the rest of the year if ever again for the rest of their lives. Maybe MJ was trying to show the team how to flush irrelevant information and move on toward things that matter. Clearly, the score that resulted from the boondoggle at Wrigley doesn't.
 
Game 1 TWSNBN had 3 pp's and 2 sog. Game 2 they had 5 pp's and 11 sog. The pk was effective as they were 100% for the weekend, but in game one they allowed .66 shots per pp and in game 2 they allowed 2.20 shots per pp, a huge difference I will try and watch the game tonight, there's nothing else I'd rather watch.

I believe OSU has out shot Wisconsin in 3 of the 4 meetings. I think the take away is that Wisco coaches had their team ready to play coming out of the break and OSU did not.
 
I believe OSU has out shot Wisconsin in 3 of the 4 meetings. I think the take away is that Wisco coaches had their team ready to play coming out of the break and OSU did not.

MJ mentioned a couple times in interviews leading up to playing at Wrigley that the ice surface would be 200x85, allowing Ohio State to more readily pinch along the boards, and slow the badgers down. So maybe the way to say it is Ohio State outshot UW when playing on an 85 foot rink, and UW outshot on the 90 foot rink?
 
Boy there are some ugly ugly transition defense going on there today. I haven't seen it that bad in a long time. Thankfully Ava saved the bacon probably a half dozen times.

Who was running the defense since Dan is in Finland for the u18s?
 
Back
Top