What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Wisconsin Women's Hockey 2023-2024

Remember back a couple years ago when the schedule was announced really late, because Princeton (I think it was) cancelled and Wisconsin had to come up with a replacement NC team and ended up going to LIU in their first year playing DI?

I looked it up: That "really late" announcement came on July 12th....

Why don't we have the NC schedule yet? Nobody wants to play UW? Something else?

This is in response to this post by Robert and another one (second one up) he made earlier.

Some further clarification about my statement that the Badgers likely will schedule a second opponent prior to the start of the next WCHA campaign that will not be “terribly threatening”. This is meant only to suggest the first two series are intended to provide reasonable competition in order resolve possible issues (e.g., the makeup of Bucky’s lines for the coming season) before launching conference play - similar to the tune-up games of major powers in college football. Losses are improbable though not impossible (ala Penn State made clear last season).

Since the 2017-18 season, the Badgers have scheduled only teams from the CHA – Lindenwood, Mercyhurst, and Penn St - with the exception in 21-22 of Merrimac of Hockey East (HE). But Merrimac rarely has posed a threat to any of the major programs in HE – NE, Quinnipiac, Colgate, et al. I expect that the Badgers will continue this approach in the first two weeks this coming season.


Likewise, I anticipate that Bucky will schedule a pair of games against more serious competition during the winter break as it also has been doing in recent years. The last two seasons this has been against Quinnipiac. In 2019-20 they played Harvard and BC in the Country Class in Nashville and Robert Morris and NE in the Battle of the Burgh in Pittsburgh – events in two cities experiencing growth in their interest in youth hockey for both girls and boys. The latter was made possible by the exit of North Dakota from the WCHA which provided 4 more open slots for nonconference games that also were used to schedule nonconference games with teams from HE in several other years.

Frankly, I would not mind Bucky reverting to at least a second quality non-conference opponent to an open weekend later in the season, one that would be a serious test (BC, Harvard, etc.). Teams are allowed only 34 games during the regular season and having only one opponent prior to WCHA play possibly could mean having to face OSU, UMD, and MN immediately thereafter - a challenge of another magnitude. Still, another two games against a quality team would be interesting and exciting to watch as well as serve to prepare Bucky for post-season play against the major competitors outside the WCHA. I think some of the teams in Hockey East also would view it as helpful for preparing for the post-season NCAA tournament - kind of like a midterm exam. Why not send them an open invitation?
 
Last edited:
This is in response to this post by Robert and another one (second one up) he made earlier.

Some further clarification about my statement that the Badgers likely will schedule a second opponent prior to the start of the next WCHA campaign that will not be “terribly threatening”. This is meant only to suggest the first two series are intended to provide reasonable competition in order resolve possible issues (e.g., the makeup of Bucky’s lines for the coming season) before launching conference play - similar to the tune-up games of major powers in college football. Losses are improbable though not impossible (ala Penn State made clear last season).

Since the 2017-18 season, the Badgers have scheduled only teams from the CHA – Lindenwood, Mercyhurst, and Penn St - with the exception in 21-22 of Merrimac of Hockey East (HE). But Merrimac rarely has posed a threat to any of the major programs in HE – NE, Quinnipiac, Colgate, et al. I expect that the Badgers will continue this approach in the first two weeks this coming season.


Likewise, I anticipate that Bucky will schedule a pair of games against more serious competition during the winter break as it also has been doing in recent years. The last two seasons this has been against Quinnipiac. In 2019-20 they played Harvard and BC in the Country Class in Nashville and Robert Morris and NE in the Battle of the Burgh in Pittsburgh – events in two cities experiencing growth in their interest in youth hockey for both girls and boys. The latter was made possible by the exit of North Dakota from the WCHA which provided 4 more open slots for nonconference games that also were used to schedule nonconference games with teams from HE in several other years.

Frankly, I would not mind Bucky reverting to at least a second quality non-conference opponent to an open weekend later in the season, one that would be a serious test (BC, Harvard, etc.). Teams are allowed only 34 games during the regular season and having only one opponent prior to WCHA play possibly could mean having to face OSU, UMD, and MN immediately thereafter - a challenge of another magnitude. Still, another two games against a quality team would be interesting and exciting to watch as well as serve to prepare Bucky for post-season play against the major competitors outside the WCHA. I think some of the teams in Hockey East also would view it as helpful for preparing for the post-season NCAA tournament - kind of like a midterm exam. Why not send them an open invitation?

All the CHA teams have announced their full schedules. Wisconsin is on only Lindenwood's schedule; not playing any of the others. (And I managed to do that in 21 words!)
 
All the CHA teams have announced their full schedules. Wisconsin is on only Lindenwood's schedule; not playing any of the others. (And I managed to do that in 21 words!)

Let's play nice! I get a little wordy at times as well, I love those posts.

I don't think Q owes UW any return games for playing them last year? Does LIU or PSU?
 
Let's play nice! I get a little wordy at times as well, I love those posts.

I don't think Q owes UW any return games for playing them last year? Does LIU or PSU?

Over the last couple years, we've completed home-and-home with Penn State and Quinnipiac, and both have announced their schedules and we're not on either. UW has gone to Merrimack and LIU without return trips, but LIU has announced, and we're not playing them. Nobody in Hockey East has announced yet, so a return trip from Merrimack might happen.

I'm wondering what the hang-up is. Though there are still a good number of schools - more than half - who also haven't made a schedule announcement, so...
 
Over the last couple years, we've completed home-and-home with Penn State and Quinnipiac, and both have announced their schedules and we're not on either. UW has gone to Merrimack and LIU without return trips, but LIU has announced, and we're not playing them. Nobody in Hockey East has announced yet, so a return trip from Merrimack might happen.

I'm wondering what the hang-up is. Though there are still a good number of schools - more than half - who also haven't made a schedule announcement, so...

Thanks to TimothyA for appreciating my prior lengthy post, and to Robert for the updates on the teams that remain eligible. Mercyhurst is another former opponent the Badgers have played before, but they are booked for 2023-24. Merrimack and several teams in the fledging conferences (CPA and NEWHA) still look like they have not completed their schedules, but I view them as weak options for a competitive series. Frankly, I would prefer that the UW look to complete its schedule with 4 games against members of the ECAC and/or Hockey East – NE, Colgate, Cornell, Clarkson, Yale, BC, BU, Harvard. I would find those to be more enjoyable to watch and better preparation for the WCHA Final Faceoff and the NCAA tournament. There are open dates available that offer flexibility to accomplish this. I see the Badgers as a top tier team which only will get better by playing tough competition. I also wouldn’t mind if this approach were adopted annually.
 
Last edited:
Wisco at home vs. BC - Oct 5/6.

Thanks to FATHEAD for the update.

This is a good matchup and should help preparation for MNSt the following weekend. Would be nice if Bucky also could schedule a set of games with another quality team from ECAC or Hockey East the last weekend before January 1 to get ready for the second half of WCHA. I don’t expect it to be Northeastern (though I certainly could live with that), but there are 6-7 others that would fit the bill.
 
Wisco at home vs. BC - Oct 5/6.

So is BC a quality opponent or a cupcake? HAHAHAHAHA. UW has from time to time been accused eating too much flour and sugar and not enough protein in their non-conference tablefare.

I wonder if Grant will be flying his plane to Madison for the series or maybe he has a Wheel of Fortune or a WWE commitment.
 
So is BC a quality opponent or a cupcake? HAHAHAHAHA. UW has from time to time been accused eating too much flour and sugar and not enough protein in their non-conference tablefare.

I wonder if Grant will be flying his plane to Madison for the series or maybe he has a Wheel of Fortune or a WWE commitment.

I don't think BC at this point would qualify as a "quality" opponent but not a cupcake either. Its not Northeastern or a top ECAC team. Its probably in the top 15 but not top 10.
 
I don't think BC at this point would qualify as a "quality" opponent but not a cupcake either. Its not Northeastern or a top ECAC team. Its probably in the top 15 but not top 10.

Has Levy graduated? I remember BC getting smoked by QU to start last year, and then only putting 4 goals against a NEWHA team. BC has a losing record against the best 2 CHA teams the last couple years as well.

Meanwhile Wisco lost to Penn State to start last year but crushed them in game 2. Wisco will be fired up to not make that mistake again.

tough game for BC but I’m excited to see the matchup. Things that might help BC:
new starter at Wisco in net?

Sometimes Wisco scoring disappears

Johnson develops players; young and old will get ice time.

Really early in the season
 
Has Levy graduated? I remember BC getting smoked by QU to start last year, and then only putting 4 goals against a NEWHA team. BC has a losing record against the best 2 CHA teams the last couple years as well.

Meanwhile Wisco lost to Penn State to start last year but crushed them in game 2. Wisco will be fired up to not make that mistake again.

tough game for BC but I’m excited to see the matchup. Things that might help BC:
new starter at Wisco in net?

Sometimes Wisco scoring disappears

Johnson develops players; young and old will get ice time.

Really early in the season

They lost Levy, Bilka and Barnes. Big losses. Got a few highly ranked incoming freshmen and added a solid 5th year in Smigliani from Colgate. Still have Newhook. Will take a while to gel.
 
Given the calendar and Lindenwood on the road the week before, that's almost certainly going to be when the banner goes up.

... and (I assume) they give out the souvenir mini-banners.

I was disappointed when they switched from souvenir pucks to the banners, but now that I have three with fourth on the way (one from volleyball), I've come to like them. Time to put up another hook for it!
 
I composed the table below from the UW individual statistics page for last season. Someone somewhere made a comment about considering both the total offense and defense contribution of players as a measure of their value. So, I decided to look at the combined total for total points and +/- and separately for the one for blocks.

On the Total Pts & +/-, four Fs are in the top 5. O’Brien and Curl came out as the top 2, Harvey 3[SUP]rd[/SUP], Eden 4[SUP]th[/SUP], Compher 5[SUP]th[/SUP]. As for just +/-, only Jungels had a higher score at +45. SS also scored fairly high on this score suggesting that the UW forwards do pay attention to playing both ends of the ice and are likely to continue to do so..
I think several other things are interesting also. One is that Curl was second on blocked shots with 55 (a consistent part of her game since her arrival) and on goals with 19l, a level of play that can only be viewed as tenacious, a characteristic shared by O’Brien and Eden.

Finally, with the exception of Grace Shirley’s Shot Pct on very few shots, Simms’s percentage is considerably higher than anybody else’s. I see Simms as an aggressive player who tends to attack from the slot at speed which I believe may account for this. Her winning goal in the NCAA final is an example, at speed down the center of the ice from where she fires a very hard shot. [TABLE="class: Table, width: 733"]
[TR]
[TD]Name [/TD]
[TD]GP[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]A[/TD]
[TD]Pts[/TD]
[TD]+/[/TD]
[TD]Tot Pts & +/[/TD]
[TD]Shots[/TD]
[TD]Shot Pct[/TD]
[TD]Blks[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]O'Brien, Casey[/TD]
[TD]41[/TD]
[TD]19[/TD]
[TD]29[/TD]
[TD]48[/TD]
[TD]39[/TD]
[TD]87[/TD]
[TD]183[/TD]
[TD]0.104[/TD]
[TD]20[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Curl, Britta[/TD]
[TD]41[/TD]
[TD]19[/TD]
[TD]23[/TD]
[TD]42[/TD]
[TD]42[/TD]
[TD]84[/TD]
[TD]143[/TD]
[TD]0.133[/TD]
[TD]55[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Harvey, Caroline[/TD]
[TD]41[/TD]
[TD]13[/TD]
[TD]26[/TD]
[TD]39[/TD]
[TD]42[/TD]
[TD]81[/TD]
[TD]146[/TD]
[TD]0.089[/TD]
[TD]44[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Eden, Lacey[/TD]
[TD]40[/TD]
[TD]17[/TD]
[TD]23[/TD]
[TD]40[/TD]
[TD]38[/TD]
[TD]78[/TD]
[TD]145[/TD]
[TD]0.117[/TD]
[TD]23[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Compher, Jesse[/TD]
[TD]41[/TD]
[TD]16[/TD]
[TD]24[/TD]
[TD]40[/TD]
[TD]33[/TD]
[TD]73[/TD]
[TD]150[/TD]
[TD]0.107[/TD]
[TD]25[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="bgcolor: #e5e5e5"]Shirley, Sophie[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #e5e5e5"]41[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #e5e5e5"]12[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #e5e5e5"]25[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #e5e5e5"]37[/TD]
[TD]32[/TD]
[TD]69[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #e5e5e5"]105[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #e5e5e5"]0.114[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #e5e5e5"]15[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Jungels, Vivian[/TD]
[TD]41[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]15[/TD]
[TD]21[/TD]
[TD]45[/TD]
[TD]66[/TD]
[TD]51[/TD]
[TD]0.118[/TD]
[TD]43[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]LaMantia, Nicole[/TD]
[TD]41[/TD]
[TD]12[/TD]
[TD]17[/TD]
[TD]29[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]56[/TD]
[TD]110[/TD]
[TD]0.109[/TD]
[TD]58[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Edwards, Laila[/TD]
[TD]41[/TD]
[TD]13[/TD]
[TD]14[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]54[/TD]
[TD]101[/TD]
[TD]0.129[/TD]
[TD]21[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Simms, Kirsten[/TD]
[TD]41[/TD]
[TD]16[/TD]
[TD]16[/TD]
[TD]32[/TD]
[TD]17[/TD]
[TD]49[/TD]
[TD]98[/TD]
[TD]0.163[/TD]
[TD]7[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Wheeler, Maddi[/TD]
[TD]41[/TD]
[TD]9[/TD]
[TD]19[/TD]
[TD]28[/TD]
[TD]15[/TD]
[TD]43[/TD]
[TD]80[/TD]
[TD]0.113[/TD]
[TD]33[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Buchbinder, Natalie[/TD]
[TD]24[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]15[/TD]
[TD]15[/TD]
[TD="bgcolor: #e5e5e5"]24[/TD]
[TD]39[/TD]
[TD]39[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]24[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Edwards, Chayla[/TD]
[TD]40[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]23[/TD]
[TD]33[/TD]
[TD]39[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]52[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Enright, Claire[/TD]
[TD]39[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]11[/TD]
[TD]15[/TD]
[TD]17[/TD]
[TD]32[/TD]
[TD]52[/TD]
[TD]0.077[/TD]
[TD]7[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Kotlowski, Katie[/TD]
[TD]41[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]7[/TD]
[TD]18[/TD]
[TD]25[/TD]
[TD]38[/TD]
[TD]0.026[/TD]
[TD]22[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Wozniewicz, Sarah[/TD]
[TD]41[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]8[/TD]
[TD]14[/TD]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]24[/TD]
[TD]77[/TD]
[TD]0.078[/TD]
[TD]13[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Picard, Marianne[/TD]
[TD]41[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]7[/TD]
[TD]8[/TD]
[TD]15[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]0.037[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Shirley, Grace[/TD]
[TD]38[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]7[/TD]
[TD]13[/TD]
[TD]23[/TD]
[TD]0.217[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Helgeson, Sophie[/TD]
[TD]38[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]11[/TD]
[TD]31[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]16[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Toft, Mayson[/TD]
[TD]19[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
 
(Despite having received no 'advance' notice via email, etc...)

It looks like season ticket sales will be starting tomorrow, Mon the 17th.

The "FAQ" page for women's hockey tickets reads as if current ticket holder can buy tickets right now - though I am not currently able to do so - and that new ticket applications/requests can be submitted starting July 17.

Deadline for applications will be August 11th (one page says Aug 11, another says Aug 18). "18 home games", $90
 
Last edited:
Tickets are on sale, at go.wisc.edu/wh22sth

The normal links at the normal pages currently aren't working, but that link worked for me a few minutes ago (8:55 AM Monday)

--------------------------

And now we have a full schedule.

We already knew at Lindenwood Sept 28-29 (Thur-Friday), and we get BC confirmed Oct 5-6 (also Thur-Friday). What we didn't know is Merrimack Jan 5-6 (Friday-Saturday).
 
Last edited:
Back
Top