Re: WISCONSIN Hockey Vol. XXIV - Craziest Season Of All Time
Culture is an issue. Hockey is 3rd fiddle at UW. But for every excuse or limitation you want to bring up, there are very few schools that don't have far greater issues when compared to UW when you look at the whole picture. There are not 14 schools in the country that have advantages overall over Wisconsin to explain how UW has rarely made the tourney the last 7 or 8 years. I got a list of 10 and Notre Dame isn't even close on so many levels. The more I think about that list MSU? UNH? really? MSU and their 6000 seater 1970's fieldhouse with less recent sucess then UW as far as tourney appearances? There are at best a single handful of schools that have an advantage in the overall package of hockey over UW and MAYBE another handful you can make an arguement for while keeping a straight face. Saying hockey is the marquee sport or only d1 sport at places like CC, UNO, UMD, UNH, BU SCSU, or whomever else you want to make that arguement with out acknowledging the tremendous advantages UW has in terms of facilities, history, tv exposure, nhl alumni, financial resources, ect, ect, ect is a disengenuous comparision.
If you want to bring up the Schmaltz brothers or McIsohen, do North Dakota get every recruit they want or try for? Minnesota? Denver? Wisconsin never gets kids any of those schools would want? Eaves issues are not talent in as much as it is unbalanced talent and lacking a high end forward concistantly (which is only exasperated by unbalanced classes and earlier then expected departures). Eaves has put more players in the NHL in his tenure then anyone (I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure he has...if not...he is a close 2nd).
Culture is an issue. Hockey is 3rd fiddle at UW. But for every excuse or limitation you want to bring up, there are very few schools that don't have far greater issues when compared to UW when you look at the whole picture. There are not 14 schools in the country that have advantages overall over Wisconsin to explain how UW has rarely made the tourney the last 7 or 8 years. I got a list of 10 and Notre Dame isn't even close on so many levels. The more I think about that list MSU? UNH? really? MSU and their 6000 seater 1970's fieldhouse with less recent sucess then UW as far as tourney appearances? There are at best a single handful of schools that have an advantage in the overall package of hockey over UW and MAYBE another handful you can make an arguement for while keeping a straight face. Saying hockey is the marquee sport or only d1 sport at places like CC, UNO, UMD, UNH, BU SCSU, or whomever else you want to make that arguement with out acknowledging the tremendous advantages UW has in terms of facilities, history, tv exposure, nhl alumni, financial resources, ect, ect, ect is a disengenuous comparision.
If you want to bring up the Schmaltz brothers or McIsohen, do North Dakota get every recruit they want or try for? Minnesota? Denver? Wisconsin never gets kids any of those schools would want? Eaves issues are not talent in as much as it is unbalanced talent and lacking a high end forward concistantly (which is only exasperated by unbalanced classes and earlier then expected departures). Eaves has put more players in the NHL in his tenure then anyone (I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure he has...if not...he is a close 2nd).