UMD looks gassed going into OT...We will see what they have left.
Not enough.
UMD looks gassed going into OT...We will see what they have left.
If that is the case, how confident can OSU be if it loses the semi to UMD?Got it. Rumor has it only 2 WCHA teams will be invited to the National Tournament suggesting MN & UMD’s only route is to win the WCHA Jamboree.
I would guess that's because there are two factors at play. The trailing team has the extra skater, and all of those skaters can prioritize offense over defense. Obviously, the defending team can heavily favor defense over offense, but that's usually the case in your own zone anyway for most players."Extra attacker" works way more often that it should...
It's become almost an annual tradition that Wisconsin has clearly established itself as the league's best team by some point in January but still manages to add more drama than seems necessary into clinching the title.
If that is the case, how confident can OSU be if it loses the semi to UMD?
UMD looks gassed going into OT...We will see what they have left.
Not much...Wisconsin scores pretty easily and wins.
That's one way to look at it. The other way to look at it would be that UMD finished second in the WCHA regular season (and while I think that it was a stupid method used to seed teams, it is the method that the league agreed to use), and if the Bulldogs win Saturday, they'll be second in the league in the tourney and 2-1 H2H versus OSU. Two of the 'Dogs losses are during 3-on-3 OT, which is only a smidge more telling than a S.O. decision as far as I can see. I know how weak UMD's schedule is, only playing four road games and none versus teams with winning records. Who knows if the committee even considers factors like that.I think OSU shouldn’t have anything to worry about if they lose to UMD as long as WI wins it all. OSU crushes UMD in the SOS category with UMD having so few games vs MN & WI. That has to count a lot in tournament selection.
if the selection committee is considering my team with an 11-6 record and taking only two WCHA clubs.
Offsides Guy stated earlier that is what he had heard. If it's possible to get three in, then that would obviously change the conversation.What's the argument for only two WCHA teams?
Offsides Guy stated earlier that is what he had heard. If it's possible to get three in, then that would obviously change the conversation.
I haven't heard what method is being used to select teams, so it's just another big unknown in this pandemic year. Until I see a link where the method is spelled out, it will be Northeastern, Wisconsin, and a bunch of hopeful teams that haven't clinched anything.
Yeah, I saw that comment, and just let it go by. But - no offense to him - you have more credibility in my mind, so I thought maybe you knew something more.
Without looking at the past couple years, it seems to me at this point, pre-tournaments, that it has been "will ECAC get three or will WCHA get three?, and with ECAC certainly not getting three this year, I'll be shocked if WCHA doesn't get three. Who are the eight, if not?
No offense taken. As I had said, just a rumor I heard. And I don’t disagree that more than 2 WCHA teams certainly warrant making the National Tournament. Just hard for me to swallow if one of them is UMD over MN. That weak Dogs’ SOS is really bothersome to me.
If there are 3 teams from the WCHA it could very well be the sinners, yuckeyes and dogs.
MN is #4 now, they are in. If UM beats UW and UMD beats OSU, then UM and UMD play a 1 goal game, do 4 wwcha teams get in? Yes.