I thought about including an "Other" for NAHA and anyone pulling a UMD and winning a championship only to vacate it later. But since this isn't the Cafe, I'm not bound by Cafe rules.Why is the Freddie Meyer conference not included?
I thought about including an "Other" for NAHA and anyone pulling a UMD and winning a championship only to vacate it later. But since this isn't the Cafe, I'm not bound by Cafe rules.
You might as well have named this poll "Which conference has the most fans posting on USCHO.com?"
I agree but I did vote for WCHA even though I am a CHA fan. I just can't see Mercyhurst or anyone from the CHA winning it this year and as long as the WCHA keeps winning it,who am I to think it won't happen again.
Technically, there isn't an NCAA D-I champion. But you're right, I should have included "Collegiate Champion" so as not to confuse everyone who saw the title and automatically assumed it pertained to D-III.You should have specified D-I.
WCHA 3-4-2
Is this the first season-opening weekend the WCHA has ever had a losing record?
Noncon records so far (ex. Sacred Heart, 1-0 ECAC, 2-0 HE):
ECAC 2-1-2
CHA 4-4-1
HEA 1-1-3
WCHA 3-4-2
Is this the first season-opening weekend the WCHA has ever had a losing record? But certainly this a new standard for parity among the conferences. Going to be a lot of movement in the polls all year, and wouldn't be surprised to see a team at .500 in January in the Frozen Four again.
Technically you're right, but wasn't it so much more fun relishing the idea of a losing record, instead?Well, Mn's win over SU gets the WCHA to 500 right?
Technically you're right, but wasn't it so much more fun relishing the idea of a losing record, instead?
Technically, there isn't an NCAA D-I champion. But you're right, I should have included "Collegiate Champion" so as not to confuse everyone who saw the title and automatically assumed it pertained to D-III.
The NCAA refers to it as the "National Collegiate Women's Ice Hockey Championship" -- no mention of Division I. I believe the reason is that because there is no separate D-II tournament, D-II teams could theoretically qualify for this tournament field. In practice, that would be very difficult.Can you explain the technicality you mentioned?
The NCAA refers to it as the "National Collegiate Women's Ice Hockey Championship" -- no mention of Division I. I believe the reason is that because there is no separate D-II tournament, D-II teams could theoretically qualify for this tournament field. In practice, that would be very difficult.
I think one of the team's that plays in the ECAC Open tournament at the end of the year is D-II. St. Michaels maybe? I don't know for sure.Now I'm confused. D-II? I didn't think there was such thing in Women's hockey.