What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

WCHA Thread IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
2014-2015 pre-season...by me.

1) Minnesota
2) Wisconsin
3) Minnesota-Duluth
4) North Dakota
5) Minnesota State
6) Ohio State
7) St. Cloud State
8) Bemidji State
MSU graduated a lot of seniors, including Butters, so fifth seems a touch optimistic.
 
Re: WCHA Thread IV

2014-2015 pre-season...by me.

1) Minnesota
2) Wisconsin
3) Minnesota-Duluth
4) North Dakota
5) Minnesota State
6) Ohio State
7) St. Cloud State
8) Bemidji State

wow, you are really optimistic about MSU's freshman class
the only difference between 2012 & 2013 was Bemidji which went from last to nearly catching Ohio State for 5th place, it's tough to make any change, up or down in the league. I don't see any change from last year to this year, really the only thing to watch is UMD, they could hold their position, perhaps finish ahead of UND, or drop behind Ohio State.
 
UW has one of the best recruiting classes in the country, they are not going down.....

UW
UM
UND
OSU
UMD
MSU
BSU
SCSU
As a SCSU season ticket holder I have to agree
Timothy, UW is not going down, their freshman class
Is really good, maybe the best in the country. They will
Finish first and unfortunately SCSU might be near
The bottom. SCSU is loosing their top 2 scorers
Top defenseman and are still 5 players short from
Last years team.. 🙀
 
Re: WCHA Thread IV

UW has one of the best recruiting classes in the country, they are not going down.....

UW
UM
UND
OSU
UMD
MSU
BSU
SCSU

Almost for sure UW will not finish below 2nd, but in order for them to move up, UM will have to move down. Don't see that happening but I could be wrong.
 
Re: WCHA Thread IV

As a SCSU season ticket holder I have to agree
Timothy, UW is not going down, their freshman class
Is really good, maybe the best in the country. They will
Finish first and unfortunately SCSU might be near
The bottom. SCSU is loosing their top 2 scorers
Top defenseman and are still 5 players short from
Last years team.. ��

I don't think the meter really scans here.
 
Re: WCHA Thread IV

Almost for sure UW will not finish below 2nd, but in order for them to move up, UM will have to move down. Don't see that happening but I could be wrong.

I agree. Everyone was picking UM and I'd say they are the favorite, but UW has more firepower, so it's plausible. Plus their sieve seemed human in the ncaa's and ARD is even more positionally sound than Rigsby. I was also interested in seeing the fan reaction to UW being #1....
 
I agree. Everyone was picking UM and I'd say they are the favorite, but UW has more firepower, so it's plausible. Plus their sieve seemed human in the ncaa's and ARD is even more positionally sound than Rigsby. I was also interested in seeing the fan reaction to UW being #1....

I'm happy to see Rigsby gone. I'm sure 7 WCHA teams agree with me. New goalie = huge uncertainty no matter how good she looked in limited playing time.
 
Last edited:
Re: WCHA Thread IV

I'm happy to see Rigsby gone. I'm sure 7 WCHA teams agree with me. New goalie = huge uncertainty no matter how good she looked in limited playing time.

Desbiens (ARD for short) started 11 games and played in 12, was 11-1 (rather immaterial) with a 1.06 and a .957. She had 3 s/o's. Her only loss was to the sue (4-1), but UW played a very poor game in front of her that day. The next day as a team they played much better and won 4-1. Also, her pre-UW pedigree is very strong as well, so I don't see her as an uncertainty at all but a known performer. Had Rigsby made the Olympic team, Johnson was going to give ARD the keys to the car in goal. The fact she got all that playing time with Rigsby being injured accelerated her development. I believe based on what I've seen there will be no drop-off in goal for UW this next season.
 
Re: WCHA Thread IV

I agree. Everyone was picking UM and I'd say they are the favorite, but UW has more firepower, so it's plausible. Plus their sieve seemed human in the ncaa's and ARD is even more positionally sound than Rigsby. I was also interested in seeing the fan reaction to UW being #1....

Huh? Am I missing something?
Granted, gone are Terry and Davis which accounted for 103 points last season. Back are Brandt (65), Bona (61) , Ramsey (43), McMillen (39), Menefee (37), Cameranesi (36), and Lowrence (35). Schipper is right there with 29.
The only player that Wisconsin has that would be in this group would be Turnbull with 40. To say that Wisconsin has more fire power is...I'm sorry -- no offense intended.....delusional.

Regardless, I do think that Wisconsin is capable of taking one or two from MN this season depending on the goaltending, but MN is still clearly the favorite in my maroon-colored world.

Minn
Wisc.
Duluth (more gained that lost)
No Dak (please get a nickname)
Ohio St (old-time hockey--Eddie Shore)
MSU-Kato (will have to learn an entire new roster)
SCSU (should have hired Bah)
Bemidji (please hire someone...ANYONE!)
 
Re: WCHA Thread IV

Desbiens (ARD for short) started 11 games and played in 12, was 11-1 (rather immaterial) with a 1.06 and a .957. She had 3 s/o's. Her only loss was to the sue (4-1), but UW played a very poor game in front of her that day. The next day as a team they played much better and won 4-1. Also, her pre-UW pedigree is very strong as well, so I don't see her as an uncertainty at all but a known performer. Had Rigsby made the Olympic team, Johnson was going to give ARD the keys to the car in goal. The fact she got all that playing time with Rigsby being injured accelerated her development. I believe based on what I've seen there will be no drop-off in goal for UW this next season.

ARD against teams above 500 --> 2-1; 2.33 GAA; .923 SV % = uncertainty.
 
Re: WCHA Thread IV

Huh? Am I missing something?
Granted, gone are Terry and Davis which accounted for 103 points last season. Back are Brandt (65), Bona (61) , Ramsey (43), McMillen (39), Menefee (37), Cameranesi (36), and Lowrence (35). Schipper is right there with 29.
The only player that Wisconsin has that would be in this group would be Turnbull with 40. To say that Wisconsin has more fire power is...I'm sorry -- no offense intended.....delusional.

Regardless, I do think that Wisconsin is capable of taking one or two from MN this season depending on the goaltending, but MN is still clearly the favorite in my maroon-colored world.

Minn
Wisc.
Duluth (more gained that lost)
No Dak (please get a nickname)
Ohio St (old-time hockey--Eddie Shore)
MSU-Kato (will have to learn an entire new roster)
SCSU (should have hired Bah)
Bemidji (please hire someone...ANYONE!)
I think you're missing a couple people on your list. You are also adding Kessel back into that mix along with Stecklein.
 
Re: WCHA Thread IV

Huh? Am I missing something?
Granted, gone are Terry and Davis which accounted for 103 points last season. Back are Brandt (65), Bona (61) , Ramsey (43), McMillen (39), Menefee (37), Cameranesi (36), and Lowrence (35). Schipper is right there with 29.
The only player that Wisconsin has that would be in this group would be Turnbull with 40. To say that Wisconsin has more fire power is...I'm sorry -- no offense intended.....delusional.

Regardless, I do think that Wisconsin is capable of taking one or two from MN this season depending on the goaltending, but MN is still clearly the favorite in my maroon-colored world.

Minn
Wisc.
Duluth (more gained that lost)
No Dak (please get a nickname)
Ohio St (old-time hockey--Eddie Shore)
MSU-Kato (will have to learn an entire new roster)
SCSU (should have hired Bah)
Bemidji (please hire someone...ANYONE!)

To try to be fair to Timothy A, I think he was comparing Wisconsin's (and Wisconsin's only) "firepower" as an increase from last year to next year. But then again, he is a Badger fan so who knows what he really meant?
 
Re: WCHA Thread IV

To try to be fair to Timothy A, I think he was comparing Wisconsin's (and Wisconsin's only) "firepower" as an increase from last year to next year. But then again, he is a Badger fan so who knows what he really meant?

For what it's worth, Brittany Ammerman is also a top returning scorer and Nurse should see her production increase. A lot is expected of the incoming class and I consider Desbiens more of an X factor more than an uncertainty, but now it's just semantics. I have confidence that she'll be a legitimate full-time starter, but just not sure if she'll be elite.
 
Re: WCHA Thread IV

To try to be fair to Timothy A, I think he was comparing Wisconsin's (and Wisconsin's only) "firepower" as an increase from last year to next year.

That is exactly what I meant. The rodents have more FP than UW for sure, but UW did hang with them in 4 of 5 games last year, so I am hoping UW's gain is enough to win a game or 2 against the rodents and make things interesting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top