The Real Georgia Peach
Registered User
Re: Utica College Pioneers 2012-13 Season (Part Two)
Utica, the new Castleton.
Utica, the new Castleton.
No, only in Fishman's eyes.
+1Are we really arguing over team's rankings in the final poll?
News flash...Eau Claire won and has the hardware. Nothing else matters after that.
Are we really arguing over team's rankings in the final poll?
News flash...Eau Claire won and has the hardware. Nothing else matters after that.
These rankings mean a lot to teams that have never achieved this type of success.
http://www.ucpioneers.com/news/2013/3/19/MHOCKEY_0319135401.aspx
Are we really arguing over team's rankings in the final poll?
News flash...Eau Claire won and has the hardware. Nothing else matters after that.
I wasn't referring to the completely meaningless (and often ludicrous) USCHO poll; I don't even bother to read it anymore. Nor was I referring to any other beauty-contest or even any published metric... I was merely opining re: how the East shook-out, IMO, after all the data was in. Just talking hockey, after the fact.
These rankings mean a lot to teams that have never achieved this type of success.
http://www.ucpioneers.com/news/2013/3/19/MHOCKEY_0319135401.aspx
Cortland SMOKED Utica...stop being so giddy or I'll turn into another "fishman" We don't need that now, do we ? BTW, Cortland finished last in their conference !!!!!
Utica SMOKED Ozz...stop being so bitter or I'll turn into another "fishman" We don't need that now, do we ? BTW 6-0 after TWO periods....UC then played their fourth and fifth lines in the third. I even suited up !!!!!
They sure did smoke Oz. Were you still suited up when the Cortland game came around .
In all seriousness, my previous post was not a slam, just an observation that season end rankings do mean something to teams/athletic depts/fans that do not normally reach that level. Oswego was inclusive in that discussion in the early 2000's as it had been a long time in between NC appearances. I, like you and most everyone else on here am done with the debate over who was best in the East. Many teams have a lot to be proud of (conference championships, highest rankings, NCAA's, etc) but ultimately all fell short of the end prize.
I was just bored...but...I am tired of the Ozz posters comin on here and slamming UC.(Norm too ). I have been on the Ozz sites wishing well, saying great game, good luck etc. Never a bad word unless provoked, not like our one famous fish. Sorry !
I'm pretty sure that I just said that Eau Claire won it on the ice, and off it.
To refer to the Eastern teams, there's just a little more comparative data to look at lately, don't you agree?
I have been away for a bit...what's with the Colgate references...or is it nothing more than nothing...I'm so confused.I never said they were the best, but they were in the top five in the east at least and had their best season ever. Watch it, or I'll take the Colgate pipeline away !
I have been away for a bit...what's with the Colgate references...or is it nothing more than nothing...I'm so confused.
Sigh............................
For the record, the UC in UCBadger stands for Utica College.
In Fishman'81, the fish refers to St. John Fisher--which is in Rochester. He is a person who lives in the "greater" Utica area and likes college hockey. Why is he not a RIT fan, you might ask since that it the college hockey team in Rochester? Because they are now D-I and that would conflict with his true love in hockey, Colgate (whose year, btw, was less than stellar).
So what does this all mean?
Its all RIT's fault.