What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

US Foreign Policy: The Wogs Begin at Calais

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: US Foreign Policy: The Wogs Begin at Calais

Something just made a big BOOM! in downtown Ankara. Off to the BBC to see what's happening.

----

Just a fire.
 
Last edited:
Re: US Foreign Policy: The Wogs Begin at Calais

Submitted without comment.

Donald Trump has said that if he is elected president he may abandon a guarantee of protection to fellow Nato countries.
Speaking to the New York Times, Mr Trump said the US would only come to the aid of allies if they have "fulfilled their obligations to us".
 
Re: US Foreign Policy: The Wogs Begin at Calais

But he said on 60 Minutes he was going to get NATO to help us fight ISIS because he wouldnt commit to having too many boots on the ground. Which is it?
 
Re: US Foreign Policy: The Wogs Begin at Calais

Dangerous. It signals to Putin, China, and now Turkey that they can feel free to invade others and if its at all dicey they'll get away with it. And even if he didn't plan to defend these countries, he'd (and possibly we'd) be in a world of hurt as he tried to justify extended implications on the geopolitical environment and US concerns, and possibly involve us in a war in hindsight anyways. As far as that goes, its much safer to say nothing.

But he's in 100% full stop populist mode. Major departure from past GOP policies (or those of really any modern, major politician).
 
Re: US Foreign Policy: The Wogs Begin at Calais

Dangerous. It signals to Putin, China, and now Turkey that they can feel free to invade others and if its at all dicey they'll get away with it. And even if he didn't plan to defend these countries, he'd (and possibly we'd) be in a world of hurt as he tried to justify extended implications on the geopolitical environment and US concerns, and possibly involve us in a war in hindsight anyways. As far as that goes, its much safer to say nothing.

But he's in 100% full stop populist mode. Major departure from past GOP policies (or those of really any modern, major politician).

Yeah, this transcends party. Every administration since the formation of NATO has reiterated the collective defense clause, and for that matter what is the worth of any treaty with the US if we reserve the right to shirk?

I can't imagine that goes well for him with anyone. Even pacifists think we should renegotiate treaties to include provisos concerning the use of force, not just unilaterally abrogate such treaties as exist.
 
Re: US Foreign Policy: The Wogs Begin at Calais

Yeah, this transcends party. Every administration since the formation of NATO has reiterated the collective defense clause, and for that matter what is the worth of any treaty with the US if we reserve the right to shirk?

I can't imagine that goes well for him with anyone. Even pacifists think we should renegotiate treaties to include provisos concerning the use of force, not just unilaterally abrogate such treaties as exist.

If Russia stomps the Ukraine, is it in our national interest to commit troops? Looking back on 20/20 hindsight, maybe NATO should have stopped at the Germany/Poland bolder.
 
Re: US Foreign Policy: The Wogs Begin at Calais

This is why Trump is going to lose by more than people are currently predicting. Those old school country club neo-cons aren't going to vote for him. Frankly one this one point the Sanders crowd is sorta correct. Hillary is in some respects closer to the ancient Reaganite foreign policy crowd than Trump is (mind you, I don't think Ronbo would have launched the 2nd Iraq War either). People who actually value sanity in the WH aren't voting for Trump (or Johnson for policy reasons). Now there aren't a ton of this crowd left, and they aren't going to swing the election one way or the other, but it fits into the way this race is playing out. Trump appeals to non-educated older white males and little else.
 
Re: US Foreign Policy: The Wogs Begin at Calais

If Russia stomps the Ukraine, is it in our national interest to commit troops? Looking back on 20/20 hindsight, maybe NATO should have stopped at the Germany/Poland bolder.

No. But if Russia invades the Baltics, which are in NATO, then yes otherwise the treaty is toothless. Ukraine had their chance to join NATO.
 
Re: US Foreign Policy: The Wogs Begin at Calais

If Russia stomps the Ukraine, is it in our national interest to commit troops? Looking back on 20/20 hindsight, maybe NATO should have stopped at the Germany/Poland bolder.

Ukraine is not a member of NATO.

But I agree with you that a treaty that mandates collective defense should not expand too far. Negotiating with Near Abroad countries like Georgia and Ukraine was very aggressive. How would we have felt if Mexico had joined the Warsaw Pact?

Still, I am all for protecting the three Baltic republics, even though Russia considers that provocative.
 
Last edited:
Re: US Foreign Policy: The Wogs Begin at Calais

If Russia stomps the Ukraine, is it in our national interest to commit troops? Looking back on 20/20 hindsight, maybe NATO should have stopped at the Germany/Poland bolder.

To back up what others have said, Ukraine is not in our sphere of interest. Neither is much of Asia or Africa. But we will stretch this concept if its the belligerent country is manageable (see desert storm). Its Ukraine's position outside why we have put heavy economic pressure on Russia for its invasion of Ukraine. OTOH, Europe proper is in our sphere of interest due to heavy economic and cultural ties with US citizens. This delineation is clear to all...and historically all have respected it. Hence, knowledge of what's not OK has resulted in protection from evolving dictatorships and peace in the first world. Regarding fudging on this idea in Europe proper, we learned our lessen with Hitler in the sudetenland. (Full disclosure: I have significant business interests in Riga).
 
Re: US Foreign Policy: The Wogs Begin at Calais

To back up what others have said, Ukraine is not in our sphere of interest. Neither is much of Asia or Africa. But we will stretch this concept if its the belligerent country is manageable (see desert storm). Its Ukraine's position outside why we have put heavy economic pressure on Russia for its invasion of Ukraine. OTOH, Europe proper is in our sphere of interest due to heavy economic and cultural ties with US citizens. This delineation is clear to all...and historically all have respected it. Hence, knowledge of what's not OK has resulted in protection from evolving dictatorships and peace in the first world. Regarding fudging on this idea in Europe proper, we learned our lessen with Hitler in the sudetenland. (Full disclosure: I have significant business interests in Riga).

Among NATO nations, Poland is not in the traditional Western European-US sphere (they and US Catholics think they are but nobody else does). Neither are Turkey, Romania, Albania, Croatia, Slovakia (though Czechia is), Slovenia, or Hungary. Greece is weird -- it's on the bubble. So that chops 9 off the 28 to start with.

The natural geographic division is to have Finland, the Baltics, Poland, Slovakia, Hungary and the Balkans be the Romulan Neutral Zone between the Russians in the east, the EU in the west, and Turkey in the south and everybody pray they can sort out the Middle East.
 
Last edited:
Re: US Foreign Policy: The Wogs Begin at Calais

This is why Trump is going to lose by more than people are currently predicting. Those old school country club neo-cons aren't going to vote for him. Frankly one this one point the Sanders crowd is sorta correct. Hillary is in some respects closer to the ancient Reaganite foreign policy crowd than Trump is (mind you, I don't think Ronbo would have launched the 2nd Iraq War either). People who actually value sanity in the WH aren't voting for Trump (or Johnson for policy reasons). Now there aren't a ton of this crowd left, and they aren't going to swing the election one way or the other, but it fits into the way this race is playing out. Trump appeals to non-educated older white males and little else.

when did rover join charles river? brae burn? TCC? blue hills? wollaston? winchester? :D
 
Re: US Foreign Policy: The Wogs Begin at Calais

Among NATO nations, Poland is not in the traditional Western European-US sphere (they and US Catholics think they are but nobody else does)...

dunno. anyone who as read a history book (oh ok, sure. anyone over the age of 32 then) still carries big polish guilt. we like them and will go to the mat for them this time if needed. period.
 
Re: US Foreign Policy: The Wogs Begin at Calais

dunno. anyone who as read a history book (oh ok, sure. anyone over the age of 32 then) still carries big polish guilt. we like them and will go to the mat for them this time if needed. period.

Nah, that's a very brief moment of historical sentiment. They're like Greece and Armenia -- they're an anomaly that doesn't really fit anywhere. Ideally all the blocs would respect their neutrality and guard them from the others. But Poland doesn't have great luck with being guarded by committee.
 
Re: US Foreign Policy: The Wogs Begin at Calais

Nah, that's a very brief moment of historical sentiment. They're like Greece and Armenia -- they're an anomaly that doesn't really fit anywhere. Ideally all the blocs would respect their neutrality and guard them from the others. But Poland doesn't have great luck with being guarded by committee.

300 yrs from now when we are in the foreign policy thread you can group poland in with armenia historical :p

but not yet..
 
Re: US Foreign Policy: The Wogs Begin at Calais

and it's not brief. it carried through to lech and the shipyards and solidarity. all the way to Saint JP2.
 
Re: US Foreign Policy: The Wogs Begin at Calais

and it's not brief. it carried through to lech and the shipyards and solidarity. all the way to Saint JP2.

That's part of the brief moment. In fact, that's it's crowning moment.

If the Poles have a historical link to any western country it's France.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top