The Dutchmen have scored 37 power-play goals and allowed just 16 PPGs by their opponents. The only other team in the country with at least a 2-to-1 ratio in that department is Quinnipiac.
#2 in the INCH poll??? A tad aggressive??
#2 in the INCH poll??? A tad aggressive??
#19 in KRACH
Western Bias.
In any case, the formula is what it is. It helps that Union had a very strong showing vs. the CCHA (1-0-2, including beating UMAA), and given the CCHA is the league that is owning the majority of PWR slots at this point, it highly benefits Union. For the ECAC's sake, I do hope they can get in at-large and a make a good showing. The league is long since overdue.
Good point. I knew that the quality schedule this year would pay dividends eventually......
The next goal for Union is to show up to at least the semi's in the ECAC tourney and then win a few NCAA tournament games......until then, the team will be always be just about hype to those outside the ECAC....
I hope there can be continued peaceful fan talk about hockey here in Union land...I obviously made a mistake trying to extend the olive branch after my admittedly brash "intro" in another thread.....![]()
It's not a matter of "quality schedule". It's a matter of playing (and beating, or at least tying) the right opponents. As an example, last year RPI played and swept Alabama-Huntsville. They weren't necessarily a "quality opponent", but they had a victory over UNO, which gave a Pairwise Comparison (PWR) point over them when it comes to common opponents, and eventually helped RPI to make the tournament. In addition, we had beat BU that year, and they started kicking *** and taking names in Hockey East, which helped RPI with Pairwise all the more. In addition, the league's strong showing that year against the WCHA allowed for more COP rankings for the both of us (since Union also did very well in their non-conference play). This year, Union beat Michigan Ann Arbor. At this point, you want them to pretty much destroy the CCHA, because since the rest of the league didn't do all too well against that league (and you were the only ones in the ECAC to play UMAA), it gives you that many more chances to win Common Opponent comparisons. Obviously it doesn't help that teams like Ferris State and Miami did well against the ECAC teams, but if they lose to Michigan (Ferris lost both; Miami got a win and tie but lost to Colgate, so your game on the 25th will mean that much more in that comparison), that can give you a leg up.
When I come in here to post, I want to talk about Union hockey. After all, that's the subject of the thread. Because of my allegiances, most of my discussion points will be how Union relates to the rest of the league and country. Obviously I'll use some comparisons with my team here and there, because they always say that the best way to explain something is to associate it with something you know. There's no reason to woof, point fingers, or anything like that. We can save that for the game weekend threads.![]()
Touche`
I am currently riding out a nasty 24-hour stomach flu bug that my step kids gave to me this weekend when they showed up for a visit...
Perhaps this experience is penance.......
I am all for a healthy rivalry between the schools, I just don't like when it gets nasty and lines are crossed that shouldn't be crossed, IMHO......
For example, I have a good friend from my high school who went to RPI for his master's. When I found out that he went to RPI and that he played in the pep band, I reached out to him to talk some college hockey. Initially, he was wary and wanted to trash talk, but i showed him a white flag and an olive branch and eventually we have gotten to have good discussions about the game, both about RPI and Union.....Now, he still ribs me about Union and I rib him about RPI and that's kind of natural, however I respect him fully and he respects me in return.....
For the record, I am not a young kid out fresh out of Union or still going there. I graduated in 1992 and this year is my 20th reunion, although I probably wont make the trip back east.....
I am glad you have brought your knowledge and opinions about hockey to this thread...You know your stuff and it shows....I guess I am hoping that this thread will come alive a little more like yours over there.....
Enjoy your week and i hope to be back to solid food tomorrow.
Keith.
Actually, a very strong case could be made that the PWR overvalues ECAC teams. Union is 9th in PWR but 19th in KRACH. Cornell is tied for 15th in PWR but 22nd in KRACH.There is a lot of hockey still to be played and nothing is guaranteed, especially given the arcane PWR system and how it rewards the big 3 leagues.
Actually, a very strong case could be made that the PWR overvalues ECAC teams. Union is 9th in PWR but 19th in KRACH. Cornell is tied for 15th in PWR but 22nd in KRACH.
PWR places too much value on winning a few big games (TUCs, COps), so a weaker team has an opportunity to fool the system by getting lucky just a few times per season. This is much more likely than a poor team getting lucky all season which is what would be required to fool KRACH. A poor team who gets lucky all season is just another name for a good team!
Why do you believe that PWR favors the big 3?
Yes, insular scheduling is always a problem, even for KRACH. If there were only the ECAC and the WCHA and the only non-conference game was Union beating Alaska-Anchorage, Brown would still be rated above Minnesota.At least from what I can tell, it favors the teams that do well out of conference. Since that's generally the "big 3", of course they're going to seem favored. How did the ECAC get 3 teams in last year? They kicked some tail in the non-conference play! How did UVM make the Frozen Four a couple years ago despite almost not making the HEA playoffs?