What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

UNH Wildcats 2015-2016 (Part Three) - Living in Interesting Times

Status
Not open for further replies.
The overtime's were unkind to UNH last night, but I don't think that's the case. As much as Merrimack has outshot UNH, they're far from a dynamic offensive team - they've taken 70 more shots than UNH this season and scored 20 less goals. They chuck the puck on net from all over the ice - off angles, well outside the scoring areas, etc. As much as I hated the shots on goal debate, they are the definition of your argument, Chuck...

They are a challenged offensive team, without much finishing ability, which masks the weakness UNH has had all season keeping pucks out of the net. This gives the Wildcats a chance to keep the goals against down and lean on their superior offensive talent. So, I'll say there's a 60% chance UNH pulls it out on Sunday. The Mack will manage a pair of goals on 40+ shots (likely blowing a few more chances) because they're all Swedish..., but UNH's top line has a big night and the Wildcats win 4-2...

Unfortunately, the other two overtimes in HE last night will be their demise. With both BU and Northeastern coming back to win their respective game ones, UNH is that much more unlikely to draw Providence in round two. As long as the odds would have been against the Friars, that was their only chance to advance to the Garden based on the match ups. They weren't beating Notre Dame (if both BU and NU lost) and there is no way they're beating BC (since both BU and NU appear on the verge of advancing).

So you're six days off - UNH's season ends (mercifully!) on Saturday, March 12 in Chestnut Hill, Mass...

Dan am glad you pointed this out; despite the obvious lopsided figures one can only imagine what a BC (our next opponent providing we don't shoot ourselves in the foot that is) would do with those numbers. In that arena it's easy to throw the puck on the net. It's like 'Chuck A Puck! We've won there because of it....our forwards when they are on have taken full advantage of their opps...All we gotta do is mount more quality offensive zone time. Last nights game winner was basically an open net due (largely?) by the 5 on 3 scenario when Pots lost his stick...? Eh whatever...

Just wish we had that ability to maintain that AND had the D to match. No offense to Boyd but I don't know if it's been a lack of play this season but he's certainly struggled out there. But then..what's the alternative right now? Chuck...we're waiting... 😉
 
Last edited:
The overtime's were unkind to UNH last night, but I don't think that's the case. As much as Merrimack has outshot UNH, they're far from a dynamic offensive team - they've taken 70 more shots than UNH this season and scored 20 less goals. They chuck the puck on net from all over the ice - off angles, well outside the scoring areas, etc. As much as I hated the shots on goal debate, they are the definition of your argument, Chuck...

So you're six days off - UNH's season ends (mercifully!) on Saturday, March 12 in Chestnut Hill, Mass...

As much as I liked the spirited SOG debate last season, I quickly realized that it was not playing in my favor this season, so I have been (and will remain) silent on this controversial topic.

Hope that you are correct, Dan, as I have not been able to attend games since the Friday UVM game at the Whitt, and would look forward to visiting the CHB's in their barn next weekend.
 
Last edited:
Re: UNH Wildcats 2015-2016 (Part Three) - Living in Interesting Times

Chuck...we're waiting... 😉
Yeah c'mon already, Chuck. While we're young? We haven't got all d.... oh, wait. Next game isn't until Sunday. Never mind. Take your time.
 
Re: UNH Wildcats 2015-2016 (Part Three) - Living in Interesting Times

All I have to say is LOL

You don't think the shot differential means anything? Merrimack has basically been in the attacking zone for all but 1:30 in two games.
 
Last edited:
Re: UNH Wildcats 2015-2016 (Part Three) - Living in Interesting Times

Nice. Good for Babcock!

Regarding Parkhurst, the only beef I have with him is that he tells us way too often the time left on the clock. Last night, I swear he gave us the time like 27 seconds into the game. It's as if he doesn't know what else to say. Forget the time and just give us the play by play please!

Almost as bad as when the Red Sox announcers give the pitch count in the first inning
 
Re: UNH Wildcats 2015-2016 (Part Three) - Living in Interesting Times

The overtime's were unkind to UNH last night, but I don't think that's the case. As much as Merrimack has outshot UNH, they're far from a dynamic offensive team - they've taken 70 more shots than UNH this season and scored 20 less goals. They chuck the puck on net from all over the ice - off angles, well outside the scoring areas, etc. As much as I hated the shots on goal debate, they are the definition of your argument, Chuck...

They are a challenged offensive team, without much finishing ability, which masks the weakness UNH has had all season keeping pucks out of the net. This gives the Wildcats a chance to keep the goals against down and lean on their superior offensive talent. So, I'll say there's a 60% chance UNH pulls it out on Sunday. The Mack will manage a pair of goals on 40+ shots (likely blowing a few more chances) because they're all Swedish..., but UNH's top line has a big night and the Wildcats win 4-2...

Unfortunately, the other two overtimes in HE last night will be their demise. With both BU and Northeastern coming back to win their respective game ones, UNH is that much more unlikely to draw Providence in round two. As long as the odds would have been against the Friars, that was their only chance to advance to the Garden based on the match ups. They weren't beating Notre Dame (if both BU and NU lost) and there is no way they're beating BC (since both BU and NU appear on the verge of advancing).

So you're six days off - UNH's season ends (mercifully!) on Saturday, March 12 in Chestnut Hill, Mass...

OK I'll respond here ... overall, though, I've decided to hold my fire after last night's abysmal late game performance. In short, one team needed to win last night, and the other one didn't. And that's how both teams played the 3rd period and overtime. No huge surprises there, but I'm still very disappointed that UNH was gift-wrapped a great opportunity to advance into the real first round of the HE tourney and basically p!$$ed it down the drain. But they win tomorrow night, and it doesn't matter. Putting aside the simple fact that UNH isn't a good enough team with any significant recent postseason pedigree, though ... they don't have the luxury of p!$$ing away games like that.

And you're right, this is NOT about SOG's. I'm not commenting on the first two periods because I wasn't there ... but the sheer workrate in the 3rd period and OT was there in spades for Merrimack, and was shockingly absent from UNH's play. Other than the first 2 minutes when UNH p!$$ed away a gift PP opportunity and a chance to really put some pressure on the 'Mack ... the rest of the 3rd period felt like Merrimack was on the PP themselves despite playing even strength throughout. To use a soccer term ... UNH "parked the bus" in front of Tirone for most of the 3rd period. Forwards (including centers) were routinely below the circles and even the dots when the puck was up at the points. And this was a repeating pattern involving more than one line, and more than one paring. Against Merrimack. Merrimack.

Were there dumb/stupid plays from the usual suspects? He11 yeah. But we knew that would happen. Was Coach hands-off during the breaks and even during their TO late in regulation, while Dennehy & Co. were visibly interacting with their players. Again, yes but hardly surprising. Been there, done that, seen the movie, know how that ends, etc.

But what really bothered me - and I mean REALLY REALLY bothered me - is that the Would-Be Hobey and the Actual Hobey nominees were not engaged in the contest the way that true leaders NEED to be engaged. I didn't see his goal, but Would-Be was spending more time running his mouth at Bahe (sp?) and others than he was playing anything remotely close to a complete all-around game ... while the Actual Hobey nominee allowed himself to be taken off his game, and spent whatever time he wasn't pinned up against the glass or letting the opposing players chip at him to annoy him, floating around puck-watching and not even pretending to defend. As HR pointed out, he was out there for the final PK, let his stick get hacked out of his hands as they tried (unsuccessfully) for about the dozenth time in 30 minutes to clear their zone in a key juncture, and then stood by while MC played tic-tac-toe on the GWG. Soft, weak, like you read about.

I saw Merrimack basically out-physical and out-work a UNH team that had a chance to close the series, but decided they weren't willing to pay the price to do it. Merrimack continually smacked them around, and UNH stood there and took it. Their compete factor was missing.

I would be playing the tape of that game to the entire team tonight, and pointing out exactly where they lost at least 80% of the puck battles, and really just backed down and capitulated.

I really, really hope I'm wrong about this. *Maybe* knowing tomorrow night's game is the must-win game, they will find the cojones they were so obviously missing at the end of last night's capitulation. But those things aren't usually switch-on, switch-off qualities ... you've either got them or you don't. And I'm sorry to say, I didn't see that in their play last night ... and I don't think they're suddenly going to discover it tomorrow night. Merrimack 4, UNH 1 ... drive home safely. :(
 
Re: UNH Wildcats 2015-2016 (Part Three) - Living in Interesting Times

TK and Pots have logged huge minutes and the book on them is to beat them up which I suspect 'mack did a good job of. No surprise they were wiped out.
 
Re: UNH Wildcats 2015-2016 (Part Three) - Living in Interesting Times

Coach Mad Again trying to help out the 'Cats again this season
 
Re: UNH Wildcats 2015-2016 (Part Three) - Living in Interesting Times

Welp the UConn Huskies are out swept by those other 'Cats...as is UMass
 
Last edited:
Re: UNH Wildcats 2015-2016 (Part Three) - Living in Interesting Times

Welp the UConn Huskies are out swept by those other 'Cats...as is UMass

UMass and UConn doing what they both do best. MBPGEGAM round mercifully coming to a close in 24 hours.
 
Coach Mad Again trying to help out the 'Cats again this season

Huskies and Terriers win - so a UNH win tomorrow means a trip to The Heights. It would only be fitting for this season to end with the team and the defense getting pasted by a team like BC...
 
Re: UNH Wildcats 2015-2016 (Part Three) - Living in Interesting Times

Regarding SOG:

UNH went 1-0-1 against Merrimack during the regular season, and both games were played at Merrimack’s Lawler Arena — the smallest rink in Hockey East (200 feet by 85 feet). UNH prevailed 4-2 on Oct. 31, and the teams played to a 3-3 tie on Nov. 14.

“We know what it takes to win on that ice,” UNH captain Collin MacDonald said. “The thing you need to know about playing in that rink is that any shot is a good shot, and you’re not going to have much time with the puck when you get it.” - See more at: http://www.unionleader.com/article/...tunes&template=mobileart#sthash.CUuW1cJw.dpuf
 
Re: UNH Wildcats 2015-2016 (Part Three) - Living in Interesting Times

What you saw last night I can only guess was a microcosm of the season. Inability to keep the puck in the offensive zone, inability to keep it out of the defensive zone. Puck possession is dismal and has been all year. On top of that, the team has little speed, always a hallmark of UNH teams no matter how bad in other areas.

I believe you are describing players recruited for "strong two-way play" and character. Go to UNH's releases to USHR about its kids on this team, and you see "character" grit, etc. more so than "flat out skills." (I quoted a bunch in the other thread.) When you said before that you didn't care about what vision or style of player you wanted UNH to recruit going forward, I would remind you of this. Big players are slower unless they are elite. A coaching staff that talks about needing bigger players to win battles and compete is sending a message about where they fall on the size/skill spectrum. Maine's Gendron went into this whole hog, and we see his results. Just looking at the Brown (Souza somewhat built) post-mortem and they are a team build around two way defensive responsible play. Also looking at Union and their season is done. It looks more like their run was the product of a couple of elite skill kids (Bodie, Carr, Gostebiere) than the complementary kids Bennett likes.

Lesson for UNH -- swing for the fences on skill, even if those players are hard to get. Don't design your team to get bigger. Now, I will say that with 5'7 Grasso and Fregona coming in, you don't want to get too small, but especially on defense, get skill, not size. Players don't need to defend and win wall battles if they get the puck away and down to the other end.
 
Re: UNH Wildcats 2015-2016 (Part Three) - Living in Interesting Times

It's a no-brainer to go after them hard isn't it?
Yes. Especially when there is no one there to do anything about it. Open season on the quick, but slight of frame guys.
 
Yes. Especially when there is no one there to do anything about it. Open season on the quick, but slight of frame guys.

And they took some big ones (is clothes lining legal?!?) . Here's hoping UNH gives as good as they get tonight...Eiaserman and Hill you go get 'em...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top