What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

(un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

ScoobyDoo said:
And make you happy? Not a chance.
Click to expand...

I asked only because I'm obligated to seek help for you if you said you were. My relative level of happiness played no role in my decision to ask.

But at least you finally admitted that I can impact your decision making process. That does make me happy.
 
Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

The turnover blows. But, chances are they are not in that position if the officials don't blow it on the Rice TD. Oh well. They weren't going to win them all, and the ten-point spread isn't telling of how the game was played.
 
Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

Larch said:
Sorry to dig this up however, if not for turnover the Vikings would have won.:eek: ;)
Click to expand...

Careful, they didn't like it when I said it after/during a Viking win. I can only imagine how surly they are today. :eek:
 
Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

JF_Gophers said:
Careful, they didn't like it when I said it after/during a Viking win. I can only imagine how surly they are today. :eek:
Click to expand...

Can't be that bitter. The Vikings showed they could make mistake after mistake after mistake and still have a chance to win in one of the toughest places in the NFL.
 
Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

I thought the vikings outplayed the steelers in about every aspect of the game, and they lost it on two fluke/lucky plays
 
Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

state of hockey said:
The turnover blows. But, chances are they are not in that position if the officials don't blow it on the Rice TD. Oh well. They weren't going to win them all, and the ten-point spread isn't telling of how the game was played.
Click to expand...

What was the call on the rice touchdown....couldn't hear the tv at the bar i was at and am not familiar with that signal...

Clearly the red zone play calling needs work...1st and goal from the half yard line...and you get a free play..1 run 2 dumb passes...last week he played it safe with the go ahead field go...this week he has the tying FG in place...and doesn't play it safe.
 
Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

JF_Gophers said:
Careful, they didn't like it when I said it after/during a Viking win. I can only imagine how surly they are today. :eek:
Click to expand...

Actually I commented on it last time, and I only dug it back up to reiterate that turnovers were part of the game. I think someone also said, that you can never be sure what would happen if it hadn't been turned over, so in this same idea, we can never be sure the Vikings would have scored anyway.

I'm really not bitter about this game, I said before Baltimore that we needed to go 2-1 over the next three and I really didn't want the one to be against Green Bay, hopefully they got it out of their system. So we won a game we shouldn't' have last week, and we lost a game we should have one this week. NFL, you are a fickle *****!
 
Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

Larch said:
Actually I commented on it last time, and I only dug it back up to reiterate that turnovers were part of the game. I think someone also said, that you can never be sure what would happen if it hadn't been turned over, so in this same idea, we can never be sure the Vikings would have scored anyway.

I'm really not bitter about this game, I said before Baltimore that we needed to go 2-1 over the next three and I really didn't want the one to be against Green Bay, hopefully they got it out of their system. So we won a game we shouldn't' have last week, and we lost a game we should have one this week. NFL, you are a fickle *****!
Click to expand...

I def said if the Vikes are competitive for Balt/Pit/GB, they are for real, and so far they have answered the bell. Due to Chi crapping the bed, and (so far) having the tie-breaker against the Pack.....looks like a division title to me.
 
Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

Larch said:
Actually I commented on it last time, and I only dug it back up to reiterate that turnovers were part of the game. I think someone also said, that you can never be sure what would happen if it hadn't been turned over, so in this same idea, we can never be sure the Vikings would have scored anyway.
Click to expand...

Actually you can be sure that they wouldn't have run the non-interception back for a TD. :p
 
Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

Did anyone listen to Whine Line? Listening the morning show they are replaying a call from it.

Guy was mad that the Vikings were passing the ball after the Favre fumble returned for a TD. After AD's big run he thought the Vikings should have played for the tie and go to OT. Sludge and Superstar made fun of him for this stupid take. At this point the guy's wife/girlfriend/random female started yelling in the background about how the Vikings should have played for the tie and the caller said it was a stupid play that lead to the INT because Chester doesn't have hands and can't catch.


You play to tie the game!!!
 
Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

Dirty said:
Did anyone listen to Whine Line? Listening the morning show they are replaying a call from it.

Guy was mad that the Vikings were passing the ball after the Favre fumble returned for a TD. After AD's big run he thought the Vikings should have played for the tie and go to OT. Sludge and Superstar made fun of him for this stupid take. At this point the guy's wife/girlfriend/random female started yelling in the background about how the Vikings should have played for the tie and the caller said it was a stupid play that lead to the INT because Chester doesn't have hands and can't catch.


You play to tie the game!!!
Click to expand...
Some people are just stupid.
 
Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

Dirty said:
It's classic Whine Line though. Pure Hilarity.
Click to expand...
I expect nothing less from whine line. I'm hoping I'll be able to listen to PA today, to see what he whines about for 3 hours, although, I'm sure I'll be sick of listening to PA after about 10 minutes.
 
Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

Dirty said:
Did anyone listen to Whine Line? Listening the morning show they are replaying a call from it.

Guy was mad that the Vikings were passing the ball after the Favre fumble returned for a TD. After AD's big run he thought the Vikings should have played for the tie and go to OT. Sludge and Superstar made fun of him for this stupid take. At this point the guy's wife/girlfriend/random female started yelling in the background about how the Vikings should have played for the tie and the caller said it was a stupid play that lead to the INT because Chester doesn't have hands and can't catch.


You play to tie the game!!!
Click to expand...

Best call was a guy calling to complain about the Red Zone playcalling hypothesizing that because of Brett's ego he was changing the run calls to passes basically to pad his stats. Whine Line is epic! :D
 
Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

Ultimately this was a good loss. AFC on the road, Super Bowl champs. You don't want that undefeated specter hanging over the team for too long. Now they can win the rest of their games or try too without even thinking about that albatross hanging over their necks.
 
Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

ScoobyDoo said:
Ultimately this was a good loss. AFC on the road, Super Bowl champs. You don't want that undefeated specter hanging over the team for too long. Now they can win the rest of their games or try too without even thinking about that albatross hanging over their necks.
Click to expand...
Well said.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top