snipeshow10
New member
Re: UML Recruiting, Building for the future
Agreed. You are asking a kid who at 15/16 to make a decision that most kids at the age of 17/18 struggle with. The recruiting process just isn't fair to most athletes. Kids are offered scholarhsips and then told "well you are going to have to choose soon because we have to use it somewhere else". Some of the big name schools have been landing 8th graders/freshman in HS recently. Those kids haven't taken algebra let alone know where they want to go to college.
On the flip side, in situations like Stenglein/Roy, its frustrating for a team to see a kid break an inital commitment to go elsewhere. If they want to leave to play Major Junior and not deal with education, that I can understand because school isn't for everyone and MJ offers a completely alternative route. However, leaving just because the powers of college hockey are starting to whisper in your ear after a big season just doesn't seem right. Overall, the whole system is flawed and therein lies the beauty of the NCAA
Agreed. You are asking a kid who at 15/16 to make a decision that most kids at the age of 17/18 struggle with. The recruiting process just isn't fair to most athletes. Kids are offered scholarhsips and then told "well you are going to have to choose soon because we have to use it somewhere else". Some of the big name schools have been landing 8th graders/freshman in HS recently. Those kids haven't taken algebra let alone know where they want to go to college.
On the flip side, in situations like Stenglein/Roy, its frustrating for a team to see a kid break an inital commitment to go elsewhere. If they want to leave to play Major Junior and not deal with education, that I can understand because school isn't for everyone and MJ offers a completely alternative route. However, leaving just because the powers of college hockey are starting to whisper in your ear after a big season just doesn't seem right. Overall, the whole system is flawed and therein lies the beauty of the NCAA