Re: UML Recruiting, 2017+
I think it is less the system on the ice, and more that Bazin has found a recruiting system he likes: going after 19 and 20 year old late bloomers under a year before their enrollment. Then using his superior system on the ice to turn that group into a top 15 team.
It looks like he will at least kick the tires on some elite kids, but only ones within a year of enrolling, not the 16 year old type, and since most elite kids commit over a year before enrollment there aren't many of these recruiting battles, so there won't be many wins.
Personally, I don't think it's the best way to go about building a championship team (nor do I think it is the worst), but if it consistently gets him top 4 in HE it's hard to argue with it, and unlikely he'll to see a reason to change it.
I have a feeling that the system does affect recruiting ... but not fully sure obviously.
In the meantime, another '99 for both BU and Providence yesterday. And Wisco picks up their 9th commitment from 2018 and on in the last 30 days.
I think it is less the system on the ice, and more that Bazin has found a recruiting system he likes: going after 19 and 20 year old late bloomers under a year before their enrollment. Then using his superior system on the ice to turn that group into a top 15 team.
It looks like he will at least kick the tires on some elite kids, but only ones within a year of enrolling, not the 16 year old type, and since most elite kids commit over a year before enrollment there aren't many of these recruiting battles, so there won't be many wins.
Personally, I don't think it's the best way to go about building a championship team (nor do I think it is the worst), but if it consistently gets him top 4 in HE it's hard to argue with it, and unlikely he'll to see a reason to change it.