UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

[Salvo1017]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

I don't think they are coasting. Merrimack is a horrible rink for a team that relies on speed and getting going. Like bees in a small bottle. So small by the time they get going they hit the end wall. Carr sounding human tonight.

I've said it before and will continue to say it. The ice at Lawler is NHL size, 200x85. Sure it seems cramped because of the low ceiling and stands right on top of the ice, but it's merely perception. That mental perception can certainly contribute to play on the ice...but physically it's no different than the sheet at the Garden or Tsongas.

 

[boblav1]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

Ugh...what horrible luck on that bounce of the boards....sure look like he played it correctly to be in the corner behind him but came straight back, instead of on the opposite angle.

I thought it hit the Merrimack players skate.

 

[FiveHole12]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

I thought it hit the Merrimack players skate.

Me too.
Didn't look like any of the other goals were soft. The 2nd was a blast and the others he made the initial save with no D to clear the rebound. Looks to me like you guys gotta tighten up the D from what I see of those replays.

 

[Gainzo]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

Lowell played like crap last night. As others have stated they couldn't make a pass, create any space, and iced the puck way too many times. Lowell didn't lose that game as Merrimack won it easily.

Hoping for the opposite to happen tonight.

 

[Patman]

I've said it before and will continue to say it. The ice at Lawler is NHL size, 200x85. Sure it seems cramped because of the low ceiling and stands right on top of the ice, but it's merely perception. That mental perception can certainly contribute to play on the ice...but physically it's no different than the sheet at the Garden or Tsongas.

Hence why all this is idiotic.

The building is claustrophobic... But beyond that and the puck off the ceiling whistles it's a normal rink.

 

[leswp1]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

Gumby is here. I feel a bit better.

 

[bottomdweller]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

So because Lowell tied tonight, and prevented MC from getting another conference win, Lowell wins the tb against Merrimack. H2H is even, but Lowell has more conference wins (Lowell has 15, MC has 12) and Lowell would also win the tb if it went to record against 1st place team (Lowell 1-2 vs BC, MC is 0-2-1, Lowell 2-1 vs BU, MC is 1-2). So the only way Lowell does not get home ice is if the following happens next weekend:

PC sweeps Lowell AND
Maine beats UNH AND
MC takes at least 3 from UMass.

Doesn't matter though. This team is not playing well. If Suter is out for an extended period of time, the defense will be shot. Lyles. Corcoran, and Eiserman are all revolving doors. Hopefully they can shake the problems they have at Schneider on Friday. If they win, and BU wins, Lowell is locked in 3rd. If that's the case, Bazin has to give Carr the night off on Saturday. He looks tired and is letting in a lot of soft goals.

 

[bottomdweller]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

So because Lowell tied tonight, and prevented MC from getting another conference win, Lowell wins the tb against Merrimack. H2H is even, but Lowell has more conference wins (Lowell has 15, MC has 12) and Lowell would also win the tb if it went to record against 1st place team (Lowell 1-2 vs BC, MC is 0-2-1, Lowell 2-1 vs BU, MC is 1-2). So the only way Lowell does not get home ice is if the following happens next weekend:

PC sweeps Lowell AND
Maine beats UNH AND
MC takes at least 3 from UMass.

Doesn't matter though. This team is not playing well. If Suter is out for an extended period of time, the defense will be shot. Lyles. Corcoran, and Eiserman are all revolving doors. Hopefully they can shake the problems they have at Schneider on Friday. If they win, and BU wins, Lowell is locked in 3rd. If that's the case, Bazin has to give Carr the night off on Saturday. He looks tired and is letting in a lot of soft goals.

 

[John_Fuller]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

If they win, and BU wins, Lowell is locked in 3rd. If that's the case, Bazin has to give Carr the night off on Saturday. He looks tired and is letting in a lot of soft goals.

If 'they' means Lowell, this is not true. If BU and Lowell win on Friday, they would still be two points apart with one to play. Certainly, Lowell would clinch the #3 seed on that regard because of the tiebreaker with Merrimack (more conf. wins) and Maine can only get to 32. However, they are not locked into #3 seed as they could still get the #2 seed with a BU loss and a Lowell win on Saturday. Both teams would be tied at 35 points, Lowell gets #2 seed based on H2H tiebreaker.

If 'they' means Providence and BU wins on Friday that means that Lowell could not finish higher than the #3 seed. However, Lowell also could drop to #4 or #5 depending on the results of Saturday.

Yes, I will agree that Carr needs rest. However, I don't see how you can afford to give him that rest given what is on the line. Who would you want to play right now, Merrimack/Maine, possibly at Lawler or gulp (Alfond) or PC/UNH at Tsongas. That's a no-brainer in my mind.

 

[Patronick]

This team is not playing well. If Suter is out for an extended period of time, the defense will be shot. Lyles. Corcoran, and Eiserman are all revolving doors.

Play-the-Russian

Clap-clap Clap-clap-clap

 

[John_Fuller]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

Play-the-Russian

Clap-clap Clap-clap-clap

In fairness, I did not think that Lyles had a bad night, in some ways, I thought it was one of his better performances of the season.

 

[bigeasy29]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

Lyles played pretty good tonight and Eiserman just wasn't very effective tonight. They have nothing to lose by playing the russian.

 

[snipeshow10]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

He is really just so scary to watch though. He jumps up into the play way too much and loves playing with one hand on his stick. He has talent and can really skate, but he just doesn't seem to have the hockey sense of a defenseman.

I really don't want to match up with Merrimack again. It is like watching the mid 90's Devils. They are so incredibly boring to watch and really just suffocate teams defensively. Lowell didn't play well this weekend, but those were the two most worst overall games I have seen all season all around just from a hockey fan perspective. Not to mention my first Lawler experience, wow...

Overall, you can't spot teams like that an early lead and Lowell did it twice this weekend. Merrimack plays too conservative and has too good of defenseman to play catch up with. Also the Riverhawks really need to clean up the PK or start staying out of the box, giving up 7 PP goals in the last 4 games is an ugly stat. Hopefully they can get a sweep next weekend and head into the playoffs with some momentum.

 

[boblav1]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

Lyles played pretty good tonight and Eiserman just wasn't very effective tonight. They have nothing to lose by playing the russian.

I think it was a tough weekend all a round for most of the Hawks. They didn't win too many battles and Merrimack's size, strength and forecheck really caused problems. It was a struggle all weekend long, thankfully they were able to come back and get a point tonight. Time to re-group and get ready for PC.

Like everyone else I'm waiting to see what Sinitsyn can do, but I'm not sure it would be fair to throw a 17 year into the fire. Even if the skill level is there is he physically ready to go up against big physical teams like Merrimack and PC?

 

[leswp1]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

Agree that they are boring to watch and chippy. By the end of the game all I wanted was for someone (preferably Lyles) to check Todd into oblivion. He has to be the most irritating player to watch- stabbing, hooking, cheap stuff with lots of extracurricular activities after the whistle. The kid has skill. It is irritating as hell to watch someone with skill be cheap on general principle- I don't care who he plays for. I missed what bent him over but I was not a good Christian because I thought- finally!

You could see that Lyles was making an effort to do the right thing. I thought he was much better. I would feel worse about the one hand on the stick but having seen his upper body I think he sould control a 2X4 with one hand no problem.

 

[Salvo1017]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

Agree that they are boring to watch and chippy. By the end of the game all I wanted was for someone (preferably Lyles) to check Todd into oblivion. He has to be the most irritating player to watch- stabbing, hooking, cheap stuff with lots of extracurricular activities after the whistle. The kid has skill. It is irritating as hell to watch someone with skill be cheap on general principle- I don't care who he plays for. I missed what bent him over but I was not a good Christian because I thought- finally!

You could see that Lyles was making an effort to do the right thing. I thought he was much better. I would feel worse about the one hand on the stick but having seen his upper body I think he sould control a 2X4 with one hand no problem.

The fact that you feel this way about Todd makes me like him all the more. Scrappy and gets under the opposing team's skin. Like a Brad Marchand. Love those players when they're on your team, hate em when they wear the opposing sweater.

 

[UMLFan]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

I really don't want to match up with Merrimack again. It is like watching the mid 90's Devils.

Agreed. Just a boring game to watch because Merrimack (on the road) sucks the life out of the game. Playing the Warriors and having the lead is completely a different game from having to come back against them. Happy to take the point, but God, that was just a boring product. Kinda like watching UVM when they're on the road.

The fact that you feel this way about Todd makes me like him all the more. Scrappy and gets under the opposing team's skin. Like a Brad Marchand. Love those players when they're on your team, hate em when they wear the opposing sweater.

Actually Collins annoyed me a lot more. It's like a team full of Joey Diamonds.

 

[leswp1]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

The fact that you feel this way about Todd makes me like him all the more. Scrappy and gets under the opposing team's skin. Like a Brad Marchand. Love those players when they're on your team, hate em when they wear the opposing sweater.

I don't consider it scrappy. That stuff cheapens a good player and if they do go on to the next level usually they get their face rearranged very quickly (and big surprise to them there is no penalty), they knock it off and actually play good hockey. I have more respect for players who do not do that stuff and scare you to watch because they rely on their talent not their uncontrolled testosterone.

 

[leswp1]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

Agreed. Just a boring game to watch because Merrimack (on the road) sucks the life out of the game. Playing the Warriors and having the lead is completely a different game from having to come back against them. Happy to take the point, but God, that was just a boring product. Kinda like watching UVM when they're on the road.
Actually Collins annoyed me a lot more. It's like a team full of Joey Diamonds.

I was surprised the first game they played at the cheap stuff. I noticed it way more this yr than last yr. At the beginning of the yr they were ranked way higher than us and if a team is really good you usually don't see all the extracurricular crap. If you are good enough it isn't necessary and it wastes energy.

 

[boblav1]

Re: UML 2011-2012 Thread: Part II

Actually Collins annoyed me a lot more. It's like a team full of Joey Diamonds.

Agree, he seemed to be doing a lot of chirping this weekend. Bates is another one. He delivered that cheap shot at the end of the first game a couple of weeks ago.