What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

UMaine, 2011-2012 season thread, does anyone care anymore?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: UMaine, 2011-2012 season thread, does anyone care anymore?

Maine's 3rd goal:
0108_SPT_FrozFenJDG8792.jpg

JDG_8795.jpg

aaaaand game winner celly
JDG_8983.jpg
 
Last edited:
Re: UMaine, 2011-2012 season thread, does anyone care anymore?

yep... I agree... and FINALLY, FINALLY, FINALLY the game plan and all the preparation comes to fruition.
what game plan you ask?
Keeping Spencer at the point on the power play... you KNOW that he is going to give up a short handed breakaway, but as long has Maine can score twice for every shortie, it WORKS.

and see... it works!

except Flynn gaveup the shortie. And I can't say that that was the plan, they have had Spencer on the half boards a lot this season which has been working tons with him and Flynny down low.
 
Re: UMaine, 2011-2012 season thread, does anyone care anymore?

(Just got around to watching the game, due to other obligations.)

Was delighted to see Maine win, but it looked eerily similar to many, many other games in the TW era. Immediately after Joey put the Bears up by two, Tim put the team in a shell, and they needed a flukey OT bounce to win against a clearly inferior team.

Here's an idea: let the guys keep forechecking- they can do it!- even with a lead early in the 3rd. It's painful to watch them retreat and suffer a barrage of shots at times like that.

Again, it was fun to see them win at Fenway, but what is there to lose by letting the dogs run? It ain't like Maine's back-end is going to shut down anybody for 20 minutes.
 
Re: UMaine, 2011-2012 season thread, does anyone care anymore?

Presumably, if there's a buyout clause, then the terms are specified. The difference is that you skip the whole 'bargaining' part (which can entail substantial transaction costs).

It might matter, depending on what the exact number is, except . . . . . . does anyone think the university is interested in a buyout? If not, then this is all irrelevant.
Yes if there is a so called "BUYOUT CLAUSE"...then the amout of money paid out on the next 2 years are a big deal...but like you said if Abbott and the U are not interested in doing so,then all is moot to say the least.
 
Re: UMaine, 2011-2012 season thread, does anyone care anymore?

(Just got around to watching the game, due to other obligations.)

Was delighted to see Maine win, but it looked eerily similar to many, many other games in the TW era. Immediately after Joey put the Bears up by two, Tim put the team in a shell, and they needed a flukey OT bounce to win against a clearly inferior team.

Here's an idea: let the guys keep forechecking- they can do it!- even with a lead early in the 3rd. It's painful to watch them retreat and suffer a barrage of shots at times like that.

Again, it was fun to see them win at Fenway, but what is there to lose by letting the dogs run? It ain't like Maine's back-end is going to shut down anybody for 20 minutes.
Even when Maine wins the last few years you see far too many holes that they were lucky to win...it use to be that a win was awesome/great with a few tweeks here and there...but now it's all too clear that wins over a Vermont/UNH are different and with the next 6 games coming up will be a true test...@Merrimack/Home to BC/@BU....here's the meat and potatoes of the hockey slate...time to show if they can play with the top contenders in Hockey East.
 
Re: UMaine, 2011-2012 season thread, does anyone care anymore?

some observations from someone at the game Pryor is not a good defender......Heggerty has to make better passes...shots from point have to hit the net to get a chance...sitting back on a 2 goal lead rarely works...Sully needs LL Bean to make him some down filled pads to eliminate rebounds...Shemansky is giving Meryl Streep a run for her money in the acting contest,,,get up quick and van Riemsdyk might have gotten 5....4th line is really a fifth.....I know PP is 4th in %, but the 6 shorties given up are just too many...need more shots force them to collapse and then swing ....and why were the Black Bears only team not to have a special jesrsey.....on to Andover and victory,......
 
Re: UMaine, 2011-2012 season thread, does anyone care anymore?

Yes if there is a so called "BUYOUT CLAUSE"...then the amout of money paid out on the next 2 years are a big deal...but like you said if Abbott and the U are not interested in doing so,then all is moot to say the least.

And no one knows whats in the buyout clause. Could be for an amount less than his annual salary. Dont suspect this is the case knowing his buddy James helped craft it .....but we can hope its for peanuts and Abbott excercises his options to boot this guy, whatever they are.
 
Re: UMaine, 2011-2012 season thread, does anyone care anymore?

Congrats to the Black Bears for a nice win at Fenway. Great game, a good time was had by all.
 
Re: UMaine, 2011-2012 season thread, does anyone care anymore?

QUOTE=all bear;5314860]hehehe, you funny guy.[/QUOTE]Saw thwem at Alfond vs Marrimack earlier this year...Maine lost more than Merrimack won.... don't scare me
 
Re: UMaine, 2011-2012 season thread, does anyone care anymore?

Maine has to get some points this weekend. MC has dropped back some and Maine has improved some, whether or not Maine has improved enough remains to be seen. Goaltending is a big and I mean big advantage to MC, after that Maine has the best first line, MC has a better D. Should be closer than early in the season.
 
Re: UMaine, 2011-2012 season thread, does anyone care anymore?

Maine has to get some points this weekend. MC has dropped back some and Maine has improved some, whether or not Maine has improved enough remains to be seen. Goaltending is a big and I mean big advantage to MC, after that Maine has the best first line, MC has a better D. Should be closer than early in the season.
And they need to NOT turn the cheek and play hard/tough in their face....tough but smart hockey...let MC take the penalty's and make them pay.
 
Re: UMaine, 2011-2012 season thread, does anyone care anymore?

Maine has to get some points this weekend. MC has dropped back some and Maine has improved some, whether or not Maine has improved enough remains to be seen. Goaltending is a big and I mean big advantage to MC, after that Maine has the best first line, MC has a better D. Should be closer than early in the season.

I'd take better coaching, defence, and tending over Maine's first line any day. Hey, maybe thats the recipe for next years team!?!
 
Re: UMaine, 2011-2012 season thread, does anyone care anymore?

I'd take better coaching, defence, and tending over Maine's first line any day. Hey, maybe thats the recipe for next years team!?!
Better become a MC fan then:D
 
Re: UMaine, 2011-2012 season thread, does anyone care anymore?

some observations from someone at the game Pryor is not a good defender......Heggerty has to make better passes...shots from point have to hit the net to get a chance...sitting back on a 2 goal lead rarely works...Sully needs LL Bean to make him some down filled pads to eliminate rebounds...


Pretty much the same-old for years now...

It's one thing to not recruit any talent in net (another topic), but the bone-headed D play is something that should be able to be coached-up.Yet, it's just not happening.

Even a marginal D-man can be instructed to err on the side of safety, and to not toss lazy passes through his own crease, or to cough up the puck in panic-mode deep in his own end, when a more conservative option exists. It vexes me to see that same scary own-zone miscues and bad decisions on Saturday that I've been seeing for maybe 7 years now. A good team would have feasted on that incompetence. (Luckily, Maine was playing UNH during a down year.)

That Fenway thing was fun to watch, but I'll be amazed if the Bears can even manage to go .500 in the coming weeks. I'm fairly sure that it won't happen. If an affordable buyout is on the table, I hope the AD snaps it up before Maine loses what's left of its remaining cache.
 
Re: UMaine, 2011-2012 season thread, does anyone care anymore?

Pretty much the same-old for years now...

It's one thing to not recruit any talent in net (another topic), but the bone-headed D play is something that should be able to be coached-up.Yet, it's just not happening.

Even a marginal D-man can be instructed to err on the side of safety, and to not toss lazy passes through his own crease, or to cough up the puck in panic-mode deep in his own end, when a more conservative option exists. It vexes me to see that same scary own-zone miscues and bad decisions on Saturday that I've been seeing for maybe 7 years now. A good team would have feasted on that incompetence. (Luckily, Maine was playing UNH during a down year.)

That Fenway thing was fun to watch, but I'll be amazed if the Bears can even manage to go .500 in the coming weeks. I'm fairly sure that it won't happen. If an affordable buyout is on the table, I hope the AD snaps it up before Maine loses what's left of its remaining cache.

Well, thats it right there. No reason at all for these experienced D to be making such bone headed plays with the puck. None whatsoever. I can remember a coach who either would have coached that out of them or sat them on the bench till the problem disappeared. Its friggin embarrassing to see some of the stupid blunders some of these guys make. And its not an isolated thing either. Happens over and over again. As you say, good teams will pounce all over these mistakes. Even the average teams already have. Without good goatending its a recipe for disaster as we've seen over and over again.
 
Last edited:
Re: UMaine, 2011-2012 season thread, does anyone care anymore?

Maine has to get some points this weekend. MC has dropped back some and Maine has improved some, whether or not Maine has improved enough remains to be seen. Goaltending is a big and I mean big advantage to MC, after that Maine has the best first line, MC has a better D. Should be closer than early in the season.

Big test for Sullivan. He's got to keep them in it. Big test to see how much they've grown mentally too. Merrimack's the kind of the tear that can grind you down, you have to stay on message and not get shaken if they get a cheesy one. Last year, Maine was totally shaken by the cheesy ones. Now? We'll see. I don't think Merrimack's head and shoulder better a split shouldn't be out of the question and a Mack sweep means Maine hasn't changed/grown at all. I'd like to believe they have but they gotta prove it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top