Squarebanks
New member
Well athletics is really the way for UAA to get itself out there. Unless UAF is willing to give up some research programs to UAA, and I think we all know the answer to that. If there is any good to come out of this budget it will be the long needed reshuffling of the UA system. UAF becomes the research school, UAA the business and liberal arts school ("business" in the Alaska sense, meaning engineering and aviation as well). The problem with athletics is, at the D2 level, we need UAF. Teams wouldn't be very happy paying travel costs for one game (hockey actually doesn't have that problem, everybody would be happy to rid one Alaska school, although UAA probably isn't the one anybody would pick). Cutting UAF out of athletics just shifts costs instead of saving money.
The big thing that will decide? Political pull. Unfortunately Alaska doesn't have many politicians that went to any UA school but plenty of conservatives that hate state education in general.
I agree that in the long run we will see UAF and UAA separate more in terms of their program offerings. I think UAA will become, generally, the liberal arts and business school, and UAF will evolve into the science and agricultural school, which it already is in many respects. It'll start to mirror what you already see in other states with two major universities. I've talked to a lot of UAF people who see it going the same way, especially since UAF is trying to position itself at the forefront of the Arctic policy debate.
Also agree with your second paragraph. Too many politicians here think higher education is a joke. It's a cultural oddity of this state.