What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have no idea and neither do you. This anger is going to accomplish nothing unless it drives you to do more.

If you didn't vote, you better vote next time. If you voted, apparently it wasn't enough. Make a bigger effort next time. Volunteer. If you volunteered, ask your party what more you can do.
They know who didn't come out to vote.
 
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

You don't think they're the ones that stayed home? A pox on anyone who didn't vote or voted third party.

Rover didnt stay home. I didnt stay home. (I voted early)

If you want to know who stayed home, it was not the people saying it was a lock. It was the people who felt the need to give the finger to the system. (same with those that voted 3rd party) It was the Dems that didnt like Clinton and the undecideds who didnt like either. That is why the margin is as close as it is there may only be 5-10% of people who were on the fence but most of them stayed home and that changed everything.

The rest of the ones who stayed home are the lazy potzkers in places like Washington and Oregon who are now protesting. They didnt count anyways.

33% of the eligible voters stayed home and screwed us all. Part of that though is that we had two candidates no one liked outside of rich bankers and racist/misogynist dickwads.
 
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

Awesome, republicans have been saying that same thing(change dems and repubs around there) for 8 years T FF.

Except Republicans' idea of working with Democrats is for the Democrats to bend over and give them everything they want, and it's all good.
 
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

Not talking about itch or Paul ryan. Talking joe blow repub, heard that exact same thing from talk radio that rufus just posted. I think its funny as hell.

Well there's your problem, you listen to talk radio.
 
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

“I have never admitted that,” he said. “It doesn’t define me … I’m not gay.”

"But my boyfriend is."
 
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

Not that I agree or disagree with you but..

What do you do about farms and small businesses inherited by heirs? As to entitlements, whose charity? Mine or the government's?

Well you could just keep the estate tax as is, or maybe back to what it was before Bush. If I'm not mistaken, only .2% of American inheritances fall subject to the estate tax anyway. Even if you jigger that to go up to 1 or 2%, I don't see the issue. But then again, I'm not one of the 1% who rule this country.
 
Except Republicans' idea of working with Democrats is for the Democrats to bend over and give them everything they want, and it's all good.

I think both parties are guilty of this. It's why we're so far in debt and our infrastructure is falling apart.
 
I think both parties are guilty of this. It's why we're so far in debt and our infrastructure is falling apart.

There is a difference between using obstruction as a political tool on occasion and using it as your North Star.
 
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

To be fair: vouchers can be good if you leave reasonable limits on them. If, in theory you can save $X on a bunch of private school kids and it costs less than X you're good. But if you remove any income limits* it just turns into an upper class handout.

* rich kids are more likely to go to private school anyway, so at that point you're mostly paying the wealthy to do what they're already doing instead of encouraging more kids to go private and have public schools cost less

My problem with vouchers is, even in your income limit scenario, it steals taxpayer money from poor districts and gives it to richer ones (or preps/charters). What competent teacher wants to work in a poor, urban pubbie district where all the talented kids have bolted for schools in wealthier (dare I say, whiter) areas, and the district has lost that money? It just further dooms the poor to staying poor.

So they leave for the preppies and charters, who pay them even less because they don't have to hire union teachers, and can also lead to them getting fired much more easily. Conservatives always argue that this weeds out lazy/incompetent teachers (whom they always think number in the thousands) and rewards the "good" ones, but the reality is that the number of truly incompetent teachers I had in my entire K-12 career, I can count on one hand.

Vouchers are never about the kids. They're all about attacking teachers' unions, and encouraging migration to religiously-affiliated private schools.
 
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

My problem with vouchers is, even in your income limit scenario, it steals taxpayer money from poor districts and gives it to richer ones (or preps/charters). What competent teacher wants to work in a poor, urban pubbie district where all the talented kids have bolted for schools in wealthier (dare I say, whiter) areas, and the district has lost that money? It just further dooms the poor to staying poor.

So they leave for the preppies and charters, who pay them even less because they don't have to hire union teachers, and can also lead to them getting fired much more easily. Conservatives always argue that this weeds out lazy/incompetent teachers (whom they always think number in the thousands) and rewards the "good" ones, but the reality is that the number of truly incompetent teachers I had in my entire K-12 career, I can count on one hand.

Vouchers are never about the kids. They're all about attacking teachers' unions, and encouraging migration to religiously-affiliated private schools.

That is kind of what happened in Minneapolis. The NAACP fought for open enrollment so underprivileged students could transfer from Minneapolis North to better schools for better opportunities. They did, and so many left that Minneapolis closed North and the NAACP then had to fight to to keep it open. It is doing better now...
 
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

You may think so, but once again your truthiness is wrong.

There were three things that have prevented me from voting for Republicans this election:
1. Being the party of antiscience. They don't care about science.
2. Being the party of 'no.'
3. Progressively becoming more and more racist each election.

What started this slide away from conservatism was the realization that they just don't care about the little guy. I'm fairly well off and I will still never benefit from their economic principles. The moment I realized that, it was a hard left turn from being moderately conservative to moderately liberal. I still believe that we should be looking to trim where we can, but I can't vote for another Republican again until the left goes off the deep end.
 
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

What started this slide away from conservatism was the realization that they just don't care about the little guy. I'm fairly well off and I will still never benefit from their economic principles. The moment I realized that, it was a hard left turn from being moderately conservative to moderately liberal.

This. Sort of.

For me, it started when I came to the conclusion that the Judeo-Christian-Islamic concept of "God" is just an illusion created to scare/control people. That peeled away any reason to continue supporting Republicans on social issues. So I became a libertarian for a few years, until I started realizing that they're both full of sh*t on economics.

I don't care about another ~$1,000 in my bank account when Richard Fromage III down in Bloomfield Hills is getting another $100,000+ in his, thanks to economic conservatives' insistence on failed trickle-down principles.

The argument that the middle class and working class will see any net positive income increases from reduced corporate tax rates is also a crock. It'll just go into higher profits, or hiring more minimum wage workers. It's how the system works.
 
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

Vouchers are never about the kids. They're all about attacking teachers' unions, and encouraging migration to religiously-affiliated private schools.

And, funnel public(taxpayer) money into the hands of private corporations.
 
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

And, funnel public(taxpayer) money into the hands of private corporations.

Well, in the case of charter schools, yes.

With vouchers, it's like choosing between pancreatic cancer and lung cancer.


EDIT:

OK, that's harsh. I retract that.

If I had to choose, I'd rather see voucher kids attend the private schools, even if they are religiously-affiliated - some of them are excellent schools, despite the indoctrination (I attended one, and I'm hardly a stark raving Opus Dei lunatic ;)).

Charter schools are just shady as fck - a veiled attempt to get rid of unions, as is the case with Detroit/DPS charter schools. With the religious ones, at least they have principles, even if some of those principles are incorrect.
 
Last edited:
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

Charter schools are just shady as fck - a veiled attempt to get rid of unions, as is the case with Detroit/DPS charter schools. With the religious ones, at least they have principles, even if some of those principles are incorrect.

has to be with the set up. charters are loved here. people are killing themselves to get in there. with the ballot question couple weeks ago it was brought up how everywhere else these are frowned upon.

strange.
 
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

As far as I've seen, most charter schools, maybe not the unaffiliated ones set up here and there, but the ones where they have dozens or even more set up and run by the same organization, are just one big grift.
 
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

Charter Schools is just more trickle down theory. Just once I'd like to see the GOP with a different idea. That theory is EVERYTHING to them and permeates every policy.
 
Re: Trump First Term I: I for One Welcome Our New Trumpy Overlord

has to be with the set up. charters are loved here. people are killing themselves to get in there. with the ballot question couple weeks ago it was brought up how everywhere else these are frowned upon.

strange.

Strange, indeed...

Kate Zernike said:
While the idea was to foster academic competition, the unchecked growth of charters has created a glut of schools competing for some of the nation’s poorest students, enticing them to enroll with cash bonuses, laptops, raffle tickets for iPads and bicycles. Leaders of charter and traditional schools alike say they are being cannibalized, fighting so hard over students and the limited public dollars that follow them that no one thrives.

Detroit now has a bigger share of students in charters than any American city except New Orleans, which turned almost all its schools into charters after Hurricane Katrina. But half the charters perform only as well, or worse than, Detroit’s traditional public schools...

...

The city has emerged almost miraculously fast from the largest municipal bankruptcy in American history. Downtown Detroit hums with development — a maze of detours around construction sites with luxury apartments, a new Nike store along a stretch of prime but empty storefronts. Even where blight resumes a few blocks out, farm-to-table restaurants and modern design stores sprout hopefully. Last year, the city had its smallest population decline since the 1950s.

Hipsters move in, spurring growth in a city that isn't cool. City gets cool and hipsters leave, going square and having kids elsewhere (Royal Oak/Plymouth/Farmington/Rochester, or they leave the state altogether). Detroit continues to have issues with a paying tax base and public school funding.

Detroit is not "coming back" for anyone except young d-bags or local yuppies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top