A couple random thoughts about the first episode....What is with all the tatoos on these people? I think more had tatoos than did not. Not my cup o tea anyway. I'm glad the chick with the tatoo on the front of her neck got the axe. What was she thinking, on more than 1 level?
Do we have to have a flaming gay person on every year? You just can't keep that to yourself? What does it have to do with cooking?
I'd like to see the brotherly rivalry between Michael and Bryan develop. It's good for ratings and they both seem middle of the pack, so I'm guessing they'll both be on for at least a month.
From what I noticed it wasn't just that they had a couple tattoos, several of the contestants had large areas of their bodies, like their entire arm or, as mentioned earlier, the front of the neck, completely covered. I don't really have a problem with that, tattoos don't really bother me, if they're done right. I just found it interesting.Bear in mind that I haven't seen the first episode yet...
Assuming the age group for the current chefs is 25-40, the number of people with tattoos, particularly in people who don't work traditional jobs pretty high, I would wager. Now factor in that a majority of these folks work in urban areas (more accepting of alternative/individual ideas/lifestyles) and I bet that would account for an increased percentage as well (for example, 90% of my friends here in Boston have at least one tattoo, the number is closer to about 45% when I go back home to rural Pennsylvania).
I was thinking that too. I don't think Top Chef has had contestants this established before, I don't remember any talk of a Michelin star or James Beard finalist before this season...I'd have to think that the brothers (Michelin star, James Beard finalist) and the big guy with the beard (James Beard finalist) have to be the early favorites.You don't get a Michelin star or be a finalist for a James Beard award by being middle of the pack.
I still would prefer to see people exit the show based upon their ability (or lack thereof relative to the others) to cook, rather than bowing out because they mis-timed cooking their chops or whatever and had to send it out under/over cooked because of some artificial time limit. I know it adds entertainment value, but there's so much editing going on that I'm sure they could do so without such gimmicks. It won't keep me from watching the show (every episode since Season 2) and mho only of course.
Yeah, the time limit is artificial, but in order to have an actual competition, I think you need to have some sort of common rule, and time is pretty good. For the quickfires, it's not an issue IMO.
I completely agree with your point, but I don't see how else you could run a competition like this without some sort of time rule.
Chefs do have time limits in the real world, they're just not timed, if that makes any sense. Do you really want to wait for hours to get your food at a restaurant? I realize they can prep a lot of things before service, but they do have pressure to get the food out.
I just like seeing what they can come up with. I'm not quite as adventurous in my cooking, yet.
Chefs do have time limits in the real world, they're just not timed, if that makes any sense. Do you really want to wait for hours to get your food at a restaurant? I realize they can prep a lot of things before service, but they do have pressure to get the food out.
Bear in mind that I haven't seen the first episode yet...
Assuming the age group for the current chefs is 25-40, the number of people with tattoos, particularly in people who don't work traditional jobs pretty high, I would wager. Now factor in that a majority of these folks work in urban areas (more accepting of alternative/individual ideas/lifestyles) and I bet that would account for an increased percentage as well (for example, 90% of my friends here in Boston have at least one tattoo, the number is closer to about 45% when I go back home to rural Pennsylvania).
As to the person's sexual identity, not sure why it should be an issue? If that's their personality, then you're right, it has nothing to do with cooking. But since the show (at least in past season) has also given you a window into the lives of the chefs, rather just showing them in the kitchen, it's bound to come up. Using your thinking, I'd ask why they continue to have a55holes on the show, like Howie or Stefan or Joey, but if they're good chefs, then it shouldn't matter (and it also makes for good tv - and it would be foolish to ignore that factor).
You can make great food, but it you time it poorly, your product may get too dry, too cold, too thick, too thin, under-done, over-done.
I don't like that show because of the judges.If someone has an issue with the timed events, then they probably don't like "Chopped".
Guess I have to get on finally getting around to getting cable in the new place. Just reading these posts makes me long for the show.
You'll need it for the hockey season too, won't you?