What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Too early for the PWR? Princeton and Brown say no!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Priceless
  • Start date Start date
Re: Too early for the PWR? Princeton and Brown say no!

RPI is the first team out :p If Maine had beaten BC today, they'd be in instead of the Eagles.

Seriously, it's nice being again in a situation where games between teams that we don't play greatly affect us. That was the case, even at the end of the year, each year around a decade ago. Since then RPI hasn't been close. Now if we can sweep Yale like last season, ...
 
Re: Too early for the PWR? Princeton and Brown say no!

Code:
[B]Bridgeport		Manchester		St Louis	Green Bay[/B]
Yale			North Dakota		Denver		Duluth
UNO			UNH			BC		Notre Dame
Union      		Miami			Dartmouth	RPI
AHA      		Maine			BU		Alaska
 
Re: Too early for the PWR? Princeton and Brown say no!

Code:
[B]Bridgeport		Manchester		St Louis	Green Bay[/B]
Yale			North Dakota		Denver		Duluth
UNO			UNH			BC		Notre Dame
Union      		Miami			Dartmouth	RPI
AHA      		Maine			BU		Alaska

I'm a little surprised that Dartmouth wasn't placed in the Manchester regional. However, this is a pleasant surprise for the RPI fans. :)
 
Re: Too early for the PWR? Princeton and Brown say no!

Last in: Col Coll
Last out: Alaska

Code:
[B]Bridgeport		Manchester		St Louis	Green Bay[/B]
Yale			UNH			BC		Duluth
Union			Denver			NoDak		UNO
Notre Dame		Miami			Michigan	RPI
Maine			Col Coll		AHA Champ	BU

To avoid intra-conference games, the AHA Champ (#16 seed) plays the fourth #1 seed. The overall #1 seed draws #14 Maine.
 
Re: Too early for the PWR? Princeton and Brown say no!

BU just beat Vermont to knock Colorado College out. Welcome also to Merrimack, Western Michigan and Union.

A first look at the field:

Code:
[B]Bridgeport		Manchester		St Louis	Green Bay[/B]
Yale			BC			Minn-Duluth	North Dakota
Notre Dame		Denver			UNH		Michigan
Wisconsin 		Merrimack		RPI		Neb-Omaha
AHA Champ		Western Mich		Union		BU

UNH is a host, so they must be moved to Manchester. This starts the dominoes falling. The first round games for the top seeds stays the same, but all the 2/3 games are changed for attendance/travel purposes.


Code:
[B]Bridgeport		Manchester		St Louis		Green Bay[/B]
Yale			BC			Minn-Duluth		North Dakota
Denver			UNH			Notre Dame		Michigan
Merrimack		RPI			Neb-Omaha		Wisconsin
AHA Champ		Western Mich		Union    		BU

Conference breakdown:
WCHA - 5
Hockey East - 4
CCHA - 3
ECAC - 3
AHA - 1
 
Re: Too early for the PWR? Princeton and Brown say no!

BU just beat Vermont to knock Colorado College out. Welcome also to Merrimack, Western Michigan and Union.

A first look at the field:

Code:
[B]Bridgeport		Manchester		St Louis	Green Bay[/B]
Yale			BC			Minn-Duluth	North Dakota
Notre Dame		Denver			UNH		Michigan
Wisconsin 		Merrimack		RPI		Neb-Omaha
AHA Champ		Western Mich		Union		BU

UNH is a host, so they must be moved to Manchester. This starts the dominoes falling. The first round games for the top seeds stays the same, but all the 2/3 games are changed for attendance/travel purposes.


Code:
[B]Bridgeport		Manchester		St Louis		Green Bay[/B]
Yale			BC			Minn-Duluth		North Dakota
Denver			UNH			Notre Dame		Michigan
Merrimack		RPI			Neb-Omaha		Wisconsin
AHA Champ		Western Mich		Union    		BU

Conference breakdown:
WCHA - 5
Hockey East - 4
CCHA - 3
ECAC - 3
AHA - 1

That should make those complainers on the "ez" threads happy. After all, Yale did get their only loss from the AHA. ;)
 
Re: Too early for the PWR? Princeton and Brown say no!

BU just beat Vermont to knock Colorado College out. Welcome also to Merrimack, Western Michigan and Union.

A first look at the field:

Code:
[B]Bridgeport		Manchester		St Louis	Green Bay[/B]
Yale			BC			Minn-Duluth	North Dakota
Notre Dame		Denver			UNH		Michigan
Wisconsin 		Merrimack		RPI		Neb-Omaha
AHA Champ		Western Mich		Union		BU

UNH is a host, so they must be moved to Manchester. This starts the dominoes falling. The first round games for the top seeds stays the same, but all the 2/3 games are changed for attendance/travel purposes.


Code:
[B]Bridgeport		Manchester		St Louis		Green Bay[/B]
Yale			BC			Minn-Duluth		North Dakota
Denver			UNH			Notre Dame		Michigan
Merrimack		RPI			Neb-Omaha		Wisconsin
AHA Champ		Western Mich		Union    		BU

Conference breakdown:
WCHA - 5
Hockey East - 4
CCHA - 3
ECAC - 3
AHA - 1
My college hockey bets hope that this is the final bracket! All 4 teams I bet on are in different regions, 2 are 1 seeds, and Denver (who I got for 20-1) has the easiest cakewalk a #2 seed could hope for!
 
Re: Too early for the PWR? Princeton and Brown say no!

based on history of being as conservative as possible, i just cant see the NCAA moving that many teams around within the 3 seed band - and specifically moving Wisconsin to the green bay regional like that. above all, that would not be fair to the #1 seed (in this case nodak) to create a basic home game for the badgers. The NCAA does a lot of tinkering for attendance and $$ but they have always seemed to keep 'protecting the 1 seeds' as their primary objective.

of course if you run the bracketology as of 1/14, i have Denver as the #2 seed for GB and thus Wisconsin couldnt be moved there.
 
Re: Too early for the PWR? Princeton and Brown say no!

based on history of being as conservative as possible, i just cant see the NCAA moving that many teams around within the 3 seed band - and specifically moving Wisconsin to the green bay regional like that. above all, that would not be fair to the #1 seed (in this case nodak) to create a basic home game for the badgers. The NCAA does a lot of tinkering for attendance and $$ but they have always seemed to keep 'protecting the 1 seeds' as their primary objective.

Even though they came out on top last year in Fort Wayne, Miami may beg to differ on whether or not the NCAA keeps protection of the #1 seed a primary objective. The ticket sales were nearly non-existent for the Fort Wayne region until Michigan was placed there, a placement that certainly surprised some.
 
Re: Too early for the PWR? Princeton and Brown say no!

That's my hometown and many people I talked to in that hockey mad town were very interested and supportive that the event was coming. Then they saw the ticket prices and said, well I'm glad they're here and hope they come back, but I can't afford that.
 
Re: Too early for the PWR? Princeton and Brown say no!

based on history of being as conservative as possible, i just cant see the NCAA moving that many teams around within the 3 seed band - and specifically moving Wisconsin to the green bay regional like that. above all, that would not be fair to the #1 seed (in this case nodak) to create a basic home game for the badgers. The NCAA does a lot of tinkering for attendance and $$ but they have always seemed to keep 'protecting the 1 seeds' as their primary objective.

of course if you run the bracketology as of 1/14, i have Denver as the #2 seed for GB and thus Wisconsin couldnt be moved there.

Talk to the folks at Cornell about protecting a #1 seed. ;)

With the attendance black hole shaping up for St. Louis, I think the committee will look to the other regions to sell tickets - even if that means bracket integrity gets shaken up a bit.

Edit: Speaking of Cornell, we have Yale's Kryptonite right now: 3 WCHA #1 seeds and a WCHA #4 seed. That almost guarantees a Yale-Nebraska-Omaha first round. That's about the only chance Yale has of not playing the AHA Champ in Bridgeport (short of inexplicably losing the #1 overall seed).
 
Last edited:
Re: Too early for the PWR? Princeton and Brown say no!

based on history of being as conservative as possible, i just cant see the NCAA moving that many teams around within the 3 seed band - and specifically moving Wisconsin to the green bay regional like that. above all, that would not be fair to the #1 seed (in this case nodak) to create a basic home game for the badgers. The NCAA does a lot of tinkering for attendance and $$ but they have always seemed to keep 'protecting the 1 seeds' as their primary objective.

of course if you run the bracketology as of 1/14, i have Denver as the #2 seed for GB and thus Wisconsin couldnt be moved there.

Bull. They have never ever tried to protect Minnesota, or any western team with the number one seed. In fact, the head of the ncaa selection committee once said it was "too delicious" not to make Minnesota play against a more or less home lower seed that should never have been in the bracket. it sells tickets, and all the ncaa really cares about is money.
 
Re: Too early for the PWR? Princeton and Brown say no!

This weekend's PWR:

1 Yale (EC) 24
2 North Dakota (WC) 22
3 Denver U (WC) 22
4 Minn-Duluth (WC) 20
5 Boston Coll (HE) 19
6 Michigan (CC) 18
7 Notre Dame (CC) 17
8 Wisconsin (WC) 17
9 New Hampshire (HE) 16
10 Maine (HE) 14
11 Dartmouth (EC) 14
12 Union (EC) 12
13 Boston Univ (HE) 12
14 Merrimack (HE) 11
15 NE-Omaha (WC) 11
---
16 Western Mich (CC) 10
17 RPI (EC) 9
18 Miami (CC) 9
19 AK-Fairbanks (CC) 7
20 Princeton (EC) 5
21 Minnesota (WC) 4
22 Bemidji State (WC) 4
23 CO College (WC) 2
24 MSU-Mankato (WC) 1
25 Ohio State (CC) 0

Last team in: Nebraska-Omaha
Last team out: Western Michigan

A cursory look gives us:

Code:
[B]Bridgeport	        Manchester	St Louis	Green Bay[/B]
Yale			Minn-Duluth	Denver		North Dakota
Wisconsin 		BC		Michigan	Notre Dame
UNH			Union		Dartmouth	Maine
AHA Champ		BU		Merrimack	Neb-Omaha

First off, New Hampshire is a host so they must be placed in the Manchester regional. That means Boston College cannot be placed there as a #2 seed. We also have an intra-conference first-round game featuring North Dakota and Nebraska-Omaha. Although both Hockey East and the WCHA have five teams in the field, so the committee could keep them paired, the NCAA is loathe to do so. This causes the brackets to break apart.

Code:
[B]Bridgeport		Manchester		St Louis	Green Bay[/B]
Yale			Minn-Duluth		Denver		North Dakota
BC			Notre Dame		Michigan	Wisconsin
Union			UNH			Dartmouth	Maine
Neb-Omaha		BU			Merrimack	AHA Champ

The committee makes Green Bay strong for attendance purposes with both NoDak and Wisconsin. Manchester has UNH and BU and Bridgeport has 2 ECAC teams and Boston College. Hopefully a few Michigan fans live in the greater St. Louis area...

The most contentious move would doubtless be the AHA Champion to the Green Bay region, forcing overall #1 Yale to play UNO instead. However, the other 3 #1 seeds are from the WCHA so the committee has to choose between an intra-conference game and protecting the #1 overall seed. History says they will choose to ship the AHA Champ elsewhere.
 
Re: Too early for the PWR? Princeton and Brown say no!

The committee makes Green Bay strong for attendance purposes with both NoDak and Wisconsin. Manchester has UNH and BU and Bridgeport has 2 ECAC teams and Boston College. Hopefully a few Michigan fans live in the greater St. Louis area...

The most contentious move would doubtless be the AHA Champion to the Green Bay region, forcing overall #1 Yale to play UNO instead. However, the other 3 #1 seeds are from the WCHA so the committee has to choose between an intra-conference game and protecting the #1 overall seed. History says they will choose to ship the AHA Champ elsewhere.

Thanks for doing.

I would send North Dakota to St Louis, improving attendance and competitive balance. It would improve attendance (no need for more than Wisconsin to fill Green Bay) because UND travels well. It would also improve competitive balance in that a higher seed gets the more favorable draw...
 
Re: Too early for the PWR? Princeton and Brown say no!

Bull. They have never ever tried to protect Minnesota, or any western team with the number one seed. In fact, the head of the ncaa selection committee once said it was "too delicious" not to make Minnesota play against a more or less home lower seed that should never have been in the bracket. it sells tickets, and all the ncaa really cares about is money.

well i would have to know what years you are talking about specifically. but a) in my opinion the protecting the top seeds has become more prevalant over the years and b) i dont have much love lost for minnesota ncaa matchups as they generally play their regionals on home ice. you cant get much more favorable than that.

Even though they came out on top last year in Fort Wayne, Miami may beg to differ on whether or not the NCAA keeps protection of the #1 seed a primary objective. The ticket sales were nearly non-existent for the Fort Wayne region until Michigan was placed there, a placement that certainly surprised some.

a fair point. i thought that was an odd pairing considering the teams had just played in the ccha tournament and that used to be a consideration as well.
 
Re: Too early for the PWR? Princeton and Brown say no!

Thanks for doing.

I would send North Dakota to St Louis, improving attendance and competitive balance. It would improve attendance (no need for more than Wisconsin to fill Green Bay) because UND travels well. It would also improve competitive balance in that a higher seed gets the more favorable draw...

The NCAA doesn't consider the "draw" beyond the first round. A couple of upsets and what was considered a favorable draw gets turned on its head. The type of draw is for we the fans to discuss; I don't think the committee looks at it beyond a sometimes laughable attempt at bracket integrity.
 
Re: Too early for the PWR? Princeton and Brown say no!

I have a problem with how the NCAA tries to protect the integrity of the field AND create a more championship like atmosphere at the same time. I'm in the minority probably but I don't think both variables should be considered. Either go with a strict 1-16 seeding (allowing still for movement withing the bands to avoid conference re-matches) and let the chips fall where they may when it comes to atmosphere and ticket sales OR try to create the best environment possible by putting teams as best as the field allows in the regions they are closest to, allowing for easier travel for as many fans as possible. Like I said, I think I share this view with few fans and it will never happen, regions of death and all that.
 
Back
Top