Heh heh - I'm going to assume that last bit was for humor's sake
I need to point out something else I've said, davyd, and this involves weighing the long-term financial pros vs. cons: The financial dam is on the verge of breaking wide open. The drop-off in donor and alumni support, plus season ticket sales, is already pretty significant. Imagine what would happen if the season continues as it is, and nothing gets done in April. So I'm Mark Hollis, and I'm looking at a fork in the road.
1. Keep him. Don't have to pay him (good), Continue to lose revenue - season tickets, donations, concessions, etc. (bad), Risk to survival of program (bad)
2. Fire him. Buy him out (bad), Image isn't tarnished - I gave him his five years (neutral), stop the bleeding (good), jump-start the program (good), increase chance of becoming competitive (good)
But the biggest thing to me is weighing the money lost from support (would be big) vs. any pay-out. I would argue the former is more significant than the latter. Obviously, Hollis is in a lose-lose situation, for the moment, and the only way to get the thing moving again is take action before summer arrives.
Of course, my optimism hinges on the ability to get serious, established candidates that MSU could get without the risk of breaking the bank.