What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

The WJC Thread. USA! USA! USA!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gurtholfin
  • Start date Start date
Re: The WJC Thread. USA! USA! USA!

You can say that sure, but your inability to give the USA any kind of advantage on home ice is embarrassing. If the game was played in St. Paul, there would be no shortage of USA fans.
After posting what I did, I agree. The Midwest understands "it" as well. My bad...
 
Re: The WJC Thread. USA! USA! USA!

For me the key was the lack of 'adversity' (I know, overused term ...) Team USA faced in their pool, other than dealing with those injuries and Slovak cheap shots. Three of the four semi-finalists came out of the pool of death. American cakewalk obviously didn't prepare them for a fired up Canadian squad. And yes I agree, if you're not Canadian, or haven't lived here, you really can't understand how big a deal the World Juniors are to the fans and the players, so it is all PASSION on the ice if you are lucky enough to wear the Maple Leaf.

But congrats to Campbell, he was phenomenal and kept this from being a complete blow out.
 
Last edited:
Re: The WJC Thread. USA! USA! USA!

You can say that sure, but your inability to give the USA any kind of advantage on home ice is embarrassing. If the game was played in St. Paul, there would be no shortage of USA fans.
No offense but St. Paul is hundreds of miles from Canada and not exactly next to a large population base. Buffalo is minutes from southern Ontario and millions of Canadians. St. Paul/Minneapolis is also a lot bigger than Buffalo. It's not really a fair comparison - you may as well poke fun at Iceland for not saving Europe from Germany during WWII.
 
Re: The WJC Thread. USA! USA! USA!

The team was not only out played but the coaches were out coached. Have they ever heard of a adjustments? all the US did all night was try and beat them one on one all night and never even looked to pass.
 
Re: The WJC Thread. USA! USA! USA!

You can say that sure, but your inability to give the USA any kind of advantage on home ice is embarrassing. If the game was played in St. Paul, there would be no shortage of USA fans.

After posting what I did, I agree. The Midwest understands "it" as well. My bad...

I don't understand it -- Buffalo and Western New York as a whole supposedly is a "hockey hotbed."

I go back to what a guy wrote in the Toronto Sun after the opening day of the tournament:

Several thousand seats at HSBC Arena were empty for the U.S./Finland game on Sunday night. American hockey fans know their team is the defending gold medal champion at the world junior, right?

Americans don't show up en masse, but there have been 2 to 3 hour delays at the bridges from Ontario to New York. That is passion for the game.
 
Re: The WJC Thread. USA! USA! USA!

Correction. "One of" the biggest guys on the ice.

D'Amigo was a hero last year, but this year he was god awful. It's tough to cut someone that was such a key cog of last year's team.
Saw the Swiss game in person and have to agree that D'Amigo didn't look great. This was after the hit against the Slovaks so hard to say if that played into it but he didn't look right at all. Lots of really short shifts for him out there so I wonder if he is 100%.

Thought the line changes for the US were brutal. Dump it from center ice and get 3 new guys on. Whatever happened to having one forward either try to carry in or forecheck while the other two change? Coaching failure.
 
Re: The WJC Thread. USA! USA! USA!

No offense but St. Paul is hundreds of miles from Canada and not exactly next to a large population base. Buffalo is minutes from southern Ontario and millions of Canadians. St. Paul/Minneapolis is also a lot bigger than Buffalo. It's not really a fair comparison - you may as well poke fun at Iceland for not saving Europe from Germany during WWII.

Wrong, it was a *** joke! Just have it every year in canada if it is all about the money becase the rest of the world doesn't care enough to host it the right way.
 
Re: The WJC Thread. USA! USA! USA!

You can say that sure, but your inability to give the USA any kind of advantage on home ice is embarrassing. If the game was played in St. Paul, there would be no shortage of USA fans.

The tournament was hosted by St. Paul in 1982 and nobody came. Crickets.

USA Hockey made $4-5 million on this tourney in Buffalo based on selling 65% of tickets to Canadians from the wealthy Golden horseshoe area from St. Catharines to Toronto. The Sabres made $10-12 million for hosting.

No way St. Paul could generate that kind of money for USA Hockey. If you ask what's more important - home ice advantage or cash, you can guess which they would prefer....
 
Re: The WJC Thread. USA! USA! USA!

You can say that sure, but your inability to give the USA any kind of advantage on home ice is embarrassing. If the game was played in St. Paul, there would be no shortage of USA fans.

The tournament was hosted by St. Paul in 1982 and nobody came. Crickets.

Back in '82 the tournament was barely a blip on the radar -- certainly not as popular as it is today. If St. Paul hosted, there'd be a stream of cars coming down from the Prairie Provinces.
 
Re: The WJC Thread. USA! USA! USA!

The tournament was hosted by St. Paul in 1982 and nobody came. Crickets.

USA Hockey made $4-5 million on this tourney in Buffalo based on selling 65% of tickets to Canadians from the wealthy Golden horseshoe area from St. Catharines to Toronto. The Sabres made $10-12 million for hosting.

No way St. Paul could generate that kind of money for USA Hockey. If you ask what's more important - home ice advantage or cash, you can guess which they would prefer....

I was going to post the same comment. At this point, I'd love for the IIHF to go to a Canada every other year and have the other years be Europe two and US one. Maybe that's what they have unofficially gone to, but even then, the US venue's will likely be Buffalo, maybe Grand Forks, ND again and, I don't know - Detroit? And those chosen because of the above - the proximity to getting Canadians across the border. I can't see the Twin Cities or even Boston being successful at this point.
 
Re: The WJC Thread. USA! USA! USA!

Campbell was great. Even the first save he made right before Canada scored the first goal...

We just didn't have the personnel. Anybody left off the squad who could have made a difference in a game like this?

Maybe we should just rotate sending Blais or Eaves as coach...or maybe York ;)
 
Re: The WJC Thread. USA! USA! USA!

I don't buy the argument that Minnesota would have been a better site. With ticket prices where they were, it's going to be predominantly candaians anyways. It's not like St. Paul is an arduous journey from Canadia.
 
Re: The WJC Thread. USA! USA! USA!

Back in '82 the tournament was barely a blip on the radar -- certainly not as popular as it is today. If St. Paul hosted, there'd be a stream of cars coming down from the Prairie Provinces.

This tournament is just not popular in the United States among Americans, as evidenced by the crowd in Buffalo tonight. Maybe 3,000 USA fans and 15,000 Canada fans. If this was in St. Paul, you'd have 5,000 American fans and 12,000 Canada fans in the house.

Without Canadian fans, the tournament is a failure in the USA.
 
Re: The WJC Thread. USA! USA! USA!

Isn't it hard to say how many American fans would go if it weren't for the rabid Canadians grabbing all the tickets first?
 
Re: The WJC Thread. USA! USA! USA!

The tournament was hosted by St. Paul in 1982 and nobody came. Crickets.

USA Hockey made $4-5 million on this tourney in Buffalo based on selling 65% of tickets to Canadians from the wealthy Golden horseshoe area from St. Catharines to Toronto. The Sabres made $10-12 million for hosting.

No way St. Paul could generate that kind of money for USA Hockey. If you ask what's more important - home ice advantage or cash, you can guess which they would prefer....

It's not my fault!!! I wasn't born yet!!!
 
Re: The WJC Thread. USA! USA! USA!

Isn't it hard to say how many American fans would go if it weren't for the rabid Canadians grabbing all the tickets first?

At those prices, it would be cavernous without the canadians.
 
Re: The WJC Thread. USA! USA! USA!

You can say that sure, but your inability to give the USA any kind of advantage on home ice is embarrassing. If the game was played in St. Paul, there would be no shortage of USA fans.

This tournament is just not popular in the United States among Americans, as evidenced by the crowd in Buffalo tonight. Maybe 3,000 USA fans and 15,000 Canada fans. If this was in St. Paul, you'd have 5,000 American fans and 12,000 Canada fans in the house.

Without Canadian fans, the tournament is a failure in the USA.

If I recall, wasn't that the case in Grand Forks as well?
 
Re: The WJC Thread. USA! USA! USA!

Isn't it hard to say how many American fans would go if it weren't for the rabid Canadians grabbing all the tickets first?

Canada packed the house for every single one of their games. The US/Finland game had around 12,000 at it at best. The tickets were available and no one came.
 
Re: The WJC Thread. USA! USA! USA!

I have said this for many years, you cannot explain or teach to a kid from Texas, Florida, or California about the Canadian heart and passion. Being from the Northeast we "get it", these kids never will.

What a load of crap...
 
Back
Top