Re: The New WCHA 3, Revenge of the Sieve (2013-14)
I posted this on the Nanooks' thread, but I thought it worth cross-posting here:
I would think the same drawback applies to video if you zoom in too much. Watch last weekends AmericaOne’s video of Bemidji and MSU. The camera follows the play down the ice…but at either end the goalie and blue is in frame, and the whole neutral zone and both blue lines when in transition. They rarely zoom in except for after the whistle.
Maybe Methodical can jump in here give us the low down.
I think the big problem with zoom is that you can quickly lose the play as it turns the other way. If you watch the big NHL broadcasts, they usually go with the one camera high-center opposite the benches and supplement with cameras around the rink. They're using great cameras that can pan and zoom very quickly without losing focus — probably in the high six-figures range (if that low). I don't know of anyone in the league that's doing much past single "coaches' camera" high. It would be great to have 2-4 other angles: one from the far end lined up on each offensive zone, then maybe one down in the corner on each end. However, I don't think that A1 is providing multi-camera production support, which would mean that you'd have one person (maybe two) managing that as well as the one person who is doing QC on the outbound feed (do you have signal, do you have your time/score overlay, is the audio up and running) that's pretty much mandatory.
I can tell you that at UAH we have two people on the broadcast (or we do if I'm not sick like I was on Saturday), one guy on the camera (who stands maybe two feet to my right), the guy next to him producing the feed, and the guy below me doing the QC work that pushes the feed out of the door. I expect that's common throughout the league.
While you could run those end cameras remotely, that's still two more people to train and pay to run cameras in the corners at ice level, plus the camera expense, plus the production software/hardware/training/pay to do that right.
Mind you, Northeastern has made the investment in it and puts it out for free, but they also have a broadcast journalism department.
Anchorage does,
Fairbanks does, Huntsville does not,
Bemidji does,
BG does,
Ferris has a sports-focused one,
Lake does not (that mess reads like what you see at UAH's CommArts site, but I better not say too much about UAH or UAHStatman will lock me out of our Website), Tech does not (best as I can tell they have no comms at all),
Mankato does not, and
Northern's course catalog indicates that they have one. Please note that I'm not working for digs here because 1) UAH doesn't have the program and 2) my brother has an RTF degree from Southern Mississippi, which is generally in the caliber of all WCHA member schools in this particular focus area. (And he uses that R and T six days a week.)
Now, you may say, "Why are we going to leave this in the hands of students? Won't they screw it up?" We're not going to get pros in here to do this for cheap. The only pros-from-Dover that could realistically be brought in are the local TV stations, and while we all generally have them, it's pretty likely that none of them are great given that
Huntsville is the largest metro area in the league at 679,473[sup]1[/sup], and our TV stations suck for most everything save 1) BAMA/Auburn 2) tornado coverage 3) BAMA/Auburn and 4) high school football. (Oh, and 48 is great for manufacturing controversies to drive up ratings, except we all know that it's sensationalist crap.)
GFM
[1] Actually, the Huntsville-Decatur CSA is larger than the metro areas of the other nine member schools' cities combined.