Just link a BlackPink video and he'll be fine.I'm sure mookie would organize a Gofundme.
I'm sure mookie would organize a Gofundme.
Dr. Mrs. just made coffee. With the coffee cup sitting happily right next to the coffee maker. Something like this happens about once a month. Only a matter of time until it's something not funny. And there's nothing we can do about it.
F-ck MS.
Wait, MS can cause memory issues? I had no idea. I'm sorry man... That absolutely sucks...
Or could you not remember? :-O
Fark cancer. That is all.
Just to reiterate, fark cancer. My father in law went from almost singlehandedly deforesting an entire acerage in August after the derecho swept through to passing away last night less than 5 months later. The last month in particular sucked monkey balls after the first few months gave us hope.
Just to reiterate, fark cancer. My father in law went from almost singlehandedly deforesting an entire acerage in August after the derecho swept through to passing away last night less than 5 months later. The last month in particular sucked monkey balls after the first few months gave us hope.
Just to reiterate, fark cancer. My father in law went from almost singlehandedly deforesting an entire acerage in August after the derecho swept through to passing away last night less than 5 months later. The last month in particular sucked monkey balls after the first few months gave us hope.
Not sure where to put this, so I'm going to put this here.
There was a real interesting story in the Grand Forks Herald about medical insurance, and a rule of which I was completely unaware. The story is behind a paywall, so I will just sort of summarize it.
Apparently if a married couple each have their own health insurance through their place of work, and they then have a child, coverage for the child is governed by something called the "birthday rule." Basically, the parent whose birthday falls first during the calendar year provides the primary insurance for the child.
This rule created an issue which lead to the Herald story because the father, whose coverage ended up as primary coverage, had terrible insurance and as a result, when the child was born with some really bad medical problems the family got stuck with some very large bills.
The problem apparently could have been avoided had the father simply dropped his insurance and signed up under his wife's coverage, which probably explains why I was unaware of the rule, since my family was always covered under my insurance.
The parents can't just choose?
Who the hell wrote that rule? (I know, the insurance industry did and I suspect your party helped since hey it monetizes pain).
The parents can't just choose?
Who the hell wrote that rule? (I know, the insurance industry did and I suspect your party helped since hey it monetizes pain).
After that, I don’t see why either parent couldn’t add them to their employer based policy as having a baby allows you to make changes outside the open enrollment period.