These threads are often cool, but didn't we just have one last off-season? Why not wait until the next off-season to do another?
I say we should have threads like these all year.
These threads are often cool, but didn't we just have one last off-season? Why not wait until the next off-season to do another?
I hope Tech is in the top 10, just to see peoples' heads asplode.At this point we know that winning a title is very important for points.
I hope Tech is in the top 10, just to see peoples' heads asplode.
I haven't been around college hockey for long, but could one of you explain to me why is it that UMD is above St. Lawrence in this rankings?
Northern Michigan comes in at #18.
Not in that regard. I was debating about using a formula I use for World Cup Soccer, which accounts for success/cup. I eventually decided against doing so. My thought process was that since this is for "all-time", programs with more history should get some sort of advantage. What could easily be done though, is you could take the amount of points a team has, and divide by the number of years that they have played D-1 hockey. Then you could rank by who has the highest points/year.
Interesting..... Now I have less of a feel for how the equation works. I didn't see Clarkson and UNH as *that* different, but apparently they are.
There wasn't a big point jump from UNH to NMU. Clarkson could still be relatively close.
Boom!
Feel free to point out errors. Sorry for the formatting
There wasn't a big point jump from UNH to NMU. Clarkson could still be relatively close.
At this point we know that winning a title is very important for points.
But only official ones - the Mythical titles from the pre-NCAA days clearly don't count at all. (why yes, that is when my school racked up lots of wins and records).
But only official ones - the Mythical titles from the pre-NCAA days clearly don't count at all. (why yes, that is when my school racked up lots of wins and records).
Did I hear a rumor correctly that CCT once had an undefeated regular season, but chose not to participate in the playoffs because of the 3-year eligibility rule where freshmen had been invited to play up for the playoffs 3 years before?
Some teams dropped from D-I to a lower division, only to return. AIC had the biggest time gap in question, between the ECAC reorganization and MAAC days. I think FS23 said that early incarnations of UMass hockey counted, so they'll need to be divided by a greater number of years. Notre Dame dropped their program for several years in the '80s, IIRC. Some of the oldest programs may have also missed a year here or there early in the 1900's, especially for WWI & WWII years.