What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

The 2024 GQP Thread: Because Deutsche Gopher Fan ENDED the Last One

Seriously...have none of you ever met a phucking Jew in your life?

Like this?

giphy.gif
 
Wait so they weren't serious about it?!?! https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/2817236/rnc-closed-hispanic-community-centers/

As national Republicans prioritize reaching Hispanic Americans and other minorities for the 2024 cycle, they are facing a significant setback: Most of the Hispanic community centers launched in the last election cycle are closed.

Twenty community centers were opened during the 2022 cycle. Now only five are open, two of them having been opened in 2023, according to the Messenger, which said the Republican National Committee confirmed the closures.
 
This is a good analysis. tldr: Dump does do better with Latinos than you'd expect, less for policy than social reasons. So GQP gains with Latinos should not be dismissed, but also not exaggerated.

Ultimately voters get something for their vote. Uneducated whites have their grievances fed by Dump, so even though GQP policies harm them their votes still make sense -- even uneducated white women, who would otherwise be inexplicable.

But it's hard to see what Latinos, outside of reactionaries like Cubans and Fundies, would get from voting for Dump and/or the GQP. Non-whites do not tend to vote for white supremacists in large numbers.
 
From what it looks like the GOP does better in local elections with Latinos but nationally have real issues outside of Cubans.
 
So the RNC is floating a resolution to skip the rest of the primaries and declare Trump the presumptive nominee.
 
I wish the TV had just held on the GOP dou-chebag the whole time.

Yeah that was my favorite part. That guy has the same face Comer has every time a Dem points out they have zero proof in their Hunter Biden hearings.
 
So the RNC is floating a resolution to skip the rest of the primaries and declare Trump the presumptive nominee.

So they want to create chaos and a possible war at the convention? I realize Trump is smoking Haley and will continue to but she still got in the 40s in NH and likely will be around there up until Super Tuesday. That is a lot of people to upset in an already shrinking base over a foregone conclusion...
 

Capital punishment is an odd duck. How many people who support it as a fair means of punishment or deterrence really give a 5h!t if it is "humane" or relatively pain-free? And how many people who oppose something like what Alabama is now doing really believe that there can be "humane" state sponsored killing?

I believe capital punishment is wrong, period. It is the only punishment you can't correct or back-track on if you eventually realize a mistake was made in convicting someone, and only a moron would think the application of it is any more fair to the poor or people of color than any other portion of our justice system. I'm all for shooting and killing someone who poses an immediate physical threat. But once a person has been convicted of a crime and sent away to prison, they're not posing much of a threat to me anymore, are they?

I'm curious if any of our regular posters here support capital punishment but ONLY if we "humanely" execute those who are convicted and sentenced to death.
 
The potential value of capital punishment is:
  • protection
  • deterrence
  • vengeance
I reject protection for the reason you said. Deterrence does not seem to be borne out by studies. That leaves vengeance, which I suspect is what most supporters of state-directed death are after.

So the question is, is vengeance a valid social aim? Maybe. There are crimes that are so heinous that a large number of people -- likely the vast majority -- howl for blood. Denying those howls risks delegitimizing the judicial order, which only has power as it is respected.

I think it's case by case, TBH. I think there is a point where the lines cross and the risk of a false positive is so small that it is exceeded by the risks of social disorder because the outcome is so counter-intuitive to most people.

That is not ideologically pleasing and it flaunts principle, which suggests it's on the right track.
 
Back
Top