What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

Great game, I'm only making one prediction for next week- Harvard wins the 5 pm game
 
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

I can't resist this gem sitting on the nu facebook group right now courtesy of some tool:

3) Last penalty on the game - someone explain some rules to me - how was that not a penalty shot? He was in the act of shooting and a penalty was called?

Apparently if you get tripped while shooting, that's a penalty shot! If you still score on the shot, it counts as an and one! 13 years and running, best fans in college hockey right there!
 
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

slurpees said:
I can't resist this gem sitting on the nu facebook group right now courtesy of some tool:

3) Last penalty on the game - someone explain some rules to me - how was that not a penalty shot? He was in the act of shooting and a penalty was called?

Apparently if you get tripped while shooting, that's a penalty shot! If you still score on the shot, it counts as an and one!
Click to expand...

BU still had a foul to give though, so no penalty shot
 
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

Great game, but one has to wonder what NU has to do to finally win a Beanpot. Good experience I guess for all you future Burger King employees, as an inability to get it done affects the student body as well as the hockey team. Heck, maybe it infects the hockey team. I will give you credit for showing up though. 22 years of losing clearly isn't enough to drive you away, and there's some solace in that I suppose. :eek: :rolleyes: :D
 
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

Good showing tonight from all the student sections I thought... The BU-NU battle of the stands was nowhere near as good last year, worst responses of the night:

BU: "So are you" to "That was stupid"
NU: "Yes you can" to "We can't hear you"

Though you could do with dropping the Sasquatch chant when he's you know... not there (insert comment about BC sucks), and maybe stop copying so many superfan chants.

I still like the Dog House as a group.. you all definitely showed up in bigger numbers than the pound tonight... I just really didn't want to see that one guys testicles.
 
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

BUtiful said:
One guy whipped his ballsack out on the train and another was trying to trip BU fans as they got off at Kenmore. Neg rep away.
Click to expand...

I dont know how, but happily I missed this, did see a handful of butt cheeks pressed against the windows, yet another reminder to never touch anything on the T:rolleyes:

slurpees said:
I can't resist this gem sitting on the nu facebook group right now courtesy of some tool:

3) Last penalty on the game - someone explain some rules to me - how was that not a penalty shot? He was in the act of shooting and a penalty was called?

Apparently if you get tripped while shooting, that's a penalty shot! If you still score on the shot, it counts as an and one! 13 years and running, best fans in college hockey right there!
Click to expand...

I don't know why Cronin didn't throw a challenge flag, he seemed to have a great view from his third base dugout.
 
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

17372_1234835831022_1232970141_30637328_3987047_n.jpg


Contact to the head cross-checking... after the whistle.

2 minutes? Really?
 
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

Well, congrats to BU (again). You guys earned the win. One thing I do like about the BU fanbase is that they celebrate each Beanpot win as though they don't win it every year. As an NU fan I can appreciate a fanbase not taking success for granted.

Another agonizing loss courtesy of NU...there really isn't much to analyze, we just don't have any offensive chemistry (we have substantial talent, but absolutely no chemistry). I was happy with the poise we showed at times and Chris Rawlings was great, again, but once again I'm left saying, 'there's always next year'.

I'm really...really ****ing tired of 'there's always next year'.
 
Last edited:
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

NJ2NU said:
Another agonizing loss courtesy of NU...there really isn't much to analyze, we just don't have any offensive chemistry (we have substantial talent, but absolutely no chemistry). I was happy with the poise we showed at times and Chris Rawlings was great, again, but once again I'm left saying, 'there's always next year'.

I'm really...really ****ing tired of 'there's always next year'.
Click to expand...
Forget next year - there's always next week, when you get to play Harvard. :)

Harvard and NU: keeping each other's Beanpot records above .300 since 1952.
 
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

TonyTheTiger20 said:
17372_1234835831022_1232970141_30637328_3987047_n.jpg


Contact to the head cross-checking... after the whistle.

2 minutes? Really?
Click to expand...

I was expecting a double minor, but has anyone ever seen two different penalties called on one hit? Because it would have had to been a combo of two of the 3 you mentioned.
 
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

Agganis said:
I was expecting a double minor, but has anyone ever seen two different penalties called on one hit? Because it would have had to been a combo of two of the 3 you mentioned.
Click to expand...
Well, the official call was "Contact to the head: Cross-checking." Not sure if they'd tack on hitting after the whistle for the extra two or just extra two for being so bad.

I was surprised to see Warso lose his cool like that. That's crazy.
 
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

Scarlet said:
I love how you know that what deuce and candycanes do doesn't bother me. :rolleyes: Typical move on your part to turn it around and make it seem like I'm in the wrong here. You must have aced that class at BC - you are so good at that!!! If I had quoted one of their posts and said "hee!" or added a smiley, then your post would have some merit as then I would be the same type of hypocrite that Tony is. But I didn't. And you don't know if I neg repped either of them or sent them an email telling them not to stoop to the BC fan level. Or did nothing at all. So you can just keep posting that photo and Tony can agree with you and give you the message board version of a high five and then cry like those girls in the BU photo you continue to post because he thinks it's just awful that we did the same thing he applauded you for.

Nice win over Harvard. See you next Monday.
Click to expand...

thats rich. i could give two sh*ts who you neg rep. how do i know you didn't neg rep tony as well? how do i know you didn't yell wee at your computer after reading deuce's diatribe? how do i know you aren't deuce to begin with? the answers are simple and the same. it doesn't matter what i don't know. because i do know that the fact that your public decrying of the fat, ugly, crying girl picture while remaining silent on deuce doing the same thing is entirely disproportionate and reeks of hypocrisy and favoritism.

frankly, i don't care what you think, thought, or did about deuce anyway. your opinion is as irrelevant as his. he is just the newest in the long line of scumbag bu posters who don't know where the line is (he must have failed the social skills class at bu). you've condoned them before and you will condone them again; so just get off your high horse and cut the holier than thou routine - you are no savior.

'dont stoop to the BC fan level' she says. wow, could my point be any clearer? you've started with an unequal playing field to begin with. BC = wrong, BU = right; always has been and always will be with you. it is a tired act. if two people do the same thing; your outrage should be the same for both.

and just for good measure

n1810199_38436996_2861.jpg


what a friggin loser this kid is.
 
Re: The 2010 Beanpot: Featuring One Team Under Consideration

TonyTheTiger20 said:
Well, the official call was "Contact to the head: Cross-checking." Not sure if they'd tack on hitting after the whistle for the extra two or just extra two for being so bad.

I was surprised to see Warso lose his cool like that. That's crazy.
Click to expand...

Yeah, but contact to the head is usually followed with another term just to clarify the hit (ie: high sticking or elbowing) so although it is rare to hear it combined with cross checking that is how I interpreted it.

Warso has been quick to stand up for his teammates (and go to the box for it) in the past, but yeah, that was.... not his usual self.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top