leswp1
Well-known member
Re: The 112th Congress - The first Orange-American to be elected Speaker
I have to admit that if one place did do something wrong it would not make me paper the whole organization as bad. I am aware on personal level (friends who have accessed BC there) and on a professional level of the immense good this organization does in promoting health that is not in the slightest connected with getting abortions.
I am extremely conflicted regarding ABs but the best way for me to avoid having to deal with that conflict is to make the need not necessary.
I am unaware of the 'corruptness' of PP so I am not ignoring anything. Would you like to give some actual evidence, not some smear thing but actual court cases or charges brought? Other than people who do not agree on ABs and feel the actions are not moral, I am unaware of any corruptness. I am unaware of these 'incidents'.Handy... you forgot a couple of things... PP is a corrupt organization... PP ignores the law at its own leisure in line with its own moral system and not one codified by law.
For that matter... les, you did the same as handy... and you know these aren't isolated incidents. That being said, why does the gov't have to subsidize PP? If we agree something needs to be subsidized then why does it have to go to PP? Frankly, not one dime should go to that corrupt law-breaking organization.
I have to admit that if one place did do something wrong it would not make me paper the whole organization as bad. I am aware on personal level (friends who have accessed BC there) and on a professional level of the immense good this organization does in promoting health that is not in the slightest connected with getting abortions.
I am extremely conflicted regarding ABs but the best way for me to avoid having to deal with that conflict is to make the need not necessary.
Last edited: