Re: The 112th Congress - The first Orange-American to be elected Speaker
And this is why I am such an advocate of going back to the original federalist framework of the country. We should have a Federal gov't who's powers are limited and defined, wheras the states' power is undefined with few limits. This would allow people more control over the gov't they lived under. Its much easier to leave a state than it is to leave the country.
I'm of two minds on federalism. On one hand there's your argument which I respect, and I wish I could wholeheartedly buy it. But there are two problems:
(1) large business interests are national if not multi-national, and it's hard enough keeping them in check even with federal power. Few states (essentially, NY and CA) have the ability to protect the public interest against the natural predations of the largest corporations. Making everything local just means they can pick off any state law they don't like one at a time using their much greater firepower.
A pure federalist system's analog would be limiting each business to collecting revenue in only one state.
(2) having no national standard on a thing equals driving all states to the minimal standard. "You won't let me pollute your lakes? Fine, I'll move to Mississippi where they'll let me pollute their lakes (and I don't have to deal with darkies at my lunch counter)."
Again, a pure federalist system's analog would be splitting all national companies into 50 competing companies ("if you license us to do business in your state, we won't pollute your lakes.").
I think federalism has a place where it can benefit people and create genuine "laboratories of democracy." But it can also be used as an end-run around real regulation, undercutting everybody (which is why it's such a big hit at CPAC every year). It is appropriate with some things, not all.
Political structures are man-made, not divinely-decreed. There is really no reason why the Framers' conception of government has to be exactly mimicked today, as long as we stay within Constitutional bounds. The Framers owned people, didn't let the skirts vote, had no internal combustion engines, and 90% of the population was small-holding farmers. We have to respect our laws, but we can't just mindlessly fetishize 1776 -- those days are long, long gone.