People us different criteria as to how they vote. Clearly the people who voted for UML include perceived potential as a factor, not just performance to date. If performance to date was the only factor then how could Yale get any votes?
Possibly. Or, they have a perrenial tendency to dismiss early strong and surprising performances of teams outside major media coverage that don't fit their world view. (To wit, Canton, NY and Sault St. Marie, MI) Or both. Teams that have niot yet played do tend to get a placeholder position based on potential and that seems right. I simply like to note the anomolies and make noise on behalf of my minor media market team when it's deserved.