OK.......let's be fair then. If the hit on D'Amigo (which was a clear penalty, no argument there) deserved a 5 minute major.......then the hit Malchuk made on Caister from behind right in front of our bench which left Caister in a heap on the ice was every bit as bad (if not worse) and deserved the same 5 minutes. But that penalty was only two minutes. Caister is just as valuable to our team as D'Amigo is to yours perhaps even more so as we are so thin on defense.
Hey....I can somewhat understand your frustration but it sounds like you are taking a seasons worth of hits from other teams on your star player and blaming them all on us and our coach. No player deserves to be hit from behind, especially near the boards and in both cases the same 2 minutes was called.
If my fellow brethren want to get their blood boiling even further.....check out the game article in the Times Union Newspaper..... the whole darn article is about the one hit/incident (unlike every other game recap I read that didn't even mention it and talked about a good hockey game).
http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=897726&category=SPORTS[/URL]
Again...I can understand the frustration on the part of RPI fans and it was a penalty but no more egregious than the hit on Caister that got the same two minutes. I have a suggestion for RPI fans on how to solve the situation. Why don't you have a special practice jersey pinney made up for your special players to wear during the games so just like a quarterback we'll know which players we aren't allowed to hit during the game??!!!!