What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Show me the money--Players turning pro

Re: Show me the money--Players turning pro

Zach Cohen from BU signed with the Avalanche (and is being sent to Lake Erie).

BU West. :D

uscho front page is reporting both colby cohen and shattenkirk signing with the avs, and being sent to lake erie
 
Re: Show me the money--Players turning pro

The 80 % graduation rate, does that refer to Division I hockey players? Does that graduation rate apply to the winningest Division I hocky programs, or does it include the graduation rate of all college hockey players in all divisions of college hockey?
When using specific statistics it's imperative to identify the specific population to which the statistics refer. Otherwise you expose yourself to charges you are attempting to deceive your audience, or you are relying upon an uneducated audience to decieve itself at your urging.

:rolleyes:

The point was it is significantly different than some other major college sports.
 
Re: Show me the money--Players turning pro

Rumors abound that All WCHA, CHN All American, Poty (WCHA, CHN) Goalie of the year (INCH) Junior Marc Cheverie will also go pro. Chevy, a Florida draft pick, could take advantage of the "Wheeler Rule" (4 years since being drafted) and become a free agent this summer.
Wait and see. Pins and needles.

Tell him to sign with the Kings! I'd make him our backup for the playoff run TODAY.
 
Re: Show me the money--Players turning pro

The 80 % graduation rate, does that refer to Division I hockey players? Does that graduation rate apply to the winningest Division I hocky programs, or does it include the graduation rate of all college hockey players in all divisions of college hockey?
When using specific statistics it's imperative to identify the specific population to which the statistics refer. Otherwise you expose yourself to charges you are attempting to deceive your audience, or you are relying upon an uneducated audience to decieve itself at your urging.

If you wish, you can find these exact figures on the internet if you wish to spend the time tracking them down. I am trying to save you the trouble, as I've seen enough of them to know that my figures are pretty close to actual.

The "big" programs in college hockey also graduate players well. While the Ivies may be highest at 90-100% graduation rates, the major hockey powers tend to graduate 75+%, which is still very healthy, and tends to be above their all-student graduation rates. The net-net of all this is that college hockey has a very healthy balance of academics and hockey, unlike some of the larger NCAA sports.

For example, my school, Denver, was ranked #1 or #2 most of the season on the ice with 13 NHL draft picks. You might think these guys wouldn't care about school, but that's simply not the case. DU had 19 of its 21 eligible players (freshmen aren't eligible for all WCHA academic honors) above a 3.0 for all WCHA academic honors (broke a league record, also set by Denver last year with 17), and about 5 of them above a 3.5 GPA. They aren't majoring in corporate fitness, either. Almost all of them were in the College of Business, which is no easy picnic academically. Not all major hockey powers have this kind of academic emphasis, but college hockey schools are not churning out functional illiterates, either. Colleges graduate players that are well prepared for life after hockey, and turn out student-athletes who can compete very well in all areas.

The overall point here is that if you want to find athletes who are in academic trouble, you won't find very many of them in college hockey. We're doing fine in the classroom.
 
Re: Show me the money--Players turning pro

If you wish, you can find these exact figures on the internet if you wish to spend the time tracking them down. I am trying to save you the trouble, as I've seen enough of them to know that my figures are pretty close to actual.

The "big" programs in college hockey also graduate players well. While the Ivies may be highest at 90-100% graduation rates, the major hockey powers tend to graduate 75+%, which is still very healthy, and tends to be above their all-student graduation rates. The net-net of all this is that college hockey has a very healthy balance of academics and hockey, unlike some of the larger NCAA sports.

For example, my school, Denver, was ranked #1 or #2 most of the season on the ice with 13 NHL draft picks. You might think these guys wouldn't care about school, but that's simply not the case. DU had 19 of its 21 eligible players (freshmen aren't eligible for all WCHA academic honors) above a 3.0 for all WCHA academic honors (broke a league record, also set by Denver last year with 17), and about 5 of them above a 3.5 GPA. They aren't majoring in corporate fitness, either. Almost all of them were in the College of Business, which is no easy picnic academically. Not all major hockey powers have this kind of academic emphasis, but college hockey schools are not churning out functional illiterates, either. Colleges graduate players that are well prepared for life after hockey, and turn out student-athletes who can compete very well in all areas.

The overall point here is that if you want to find athletes who are in academic trouble, you won't find very many of them in college hockey. We're doing fine in the classroom.

Glad to hear that Denver U. is doing the right thing. I searched the net for graduation rates of college athletes and hockey players in particular, and I searched for recent numbers of cases of academic inelegibility or academic probation levied on college athletes in general and hockey players in particular. This information is not readily available. I would like to see a URL
relevent to this issue. I don't remember any academic inelegibility cases being mentioned on this forum or USCHO news? Are Division I college hockey players still subject to academic suspension? If so, how often does this happen, and where?
The NCAA is understandably reluctant to release such information, perhaps because of the small rather than the large number of cases. Even the most rabid fan would find it hard to believe today's athletes are so much smarter and study so much harder than athletes in the past that academic inelegibility has simply vanished.
 
Re: Show me the money--Players turning pro

Almost all of them were in the College of Business, which is no easy picnic academically.

I'm glad DU is doing great in the classroom, but please don't try to say business is hard. Hard as opposed to what? Being a communication major?
 
Re: Show me the money--Players turning pro

I'm glad DU is doing great in the classroom, but please don't try to say business is hard. Hard as opposed to what? Being a communication major?

At DU, the business school is considered reasonably difficult, and starting this year, it will require additional secondary admissions hurdles beyond University admissions:

http://www.daniels.du.edu/admissions/admissionscriteria/undergraduateadmissi.html

It's not engineering hard, but it's a lot harder than some other majors at DU and other schools.
 
Re: Show me the money--Players turning pro

I want to UVM in the late 80's and I have to say that most of the hockey players were actually quite good academically (had quite a few in my classes, mostly business). Guys like Ian Boyce, Jerry Tarrant (his dad was founder of IDX) Kyle McDonough were all pretty good in class..in some ways alot more disciplined than the rest of us.
 
Re: Show me the money--Players turning pro

I'm glad DU is doing great in the classroom, but please don't try to say business is hard. Hard as opposed to what? Being a communication major?

I'm glad someone said it.
Just because admissions is somewhat competitive it doesn't mean the workload or content is all that difficult.

At any rate, if college hockey players are maintaining a 3.0 gpa, in any field of study, its hard to argue with it. But I'm not going to be <i>all</i> that impressed.
 
Re: Show me the money--Players turning pro

Ryan Donald, Yale, is in Springfield on an ATO, joining Chris Vande Velde of UND. Congrats to both.
 
Re: Show me the money--Players turning pro

At some D1 schools the players that are business majors are the ones that are taking the easy way out.

I'm sure mileage varies, but I've heard an MBA referred to as "the C student's graduate degree" in several places. :p
 
Re: Show me the money--Players turning pro

I'm sure mileage varies, but I've heard an MBA referred to as "the C student's graduate degree" in several places. :p
I've never heard that before, but I like it. Unfortunately, I will probably have to get one in the next several years if I want to move into a manager postion here at work. I might be able to pull it off with a masters in engineering, but not sure.
 
Re: Show me the money--Players turning pro

Incoming SLU '14 recruit Dustin Stevenson is forgoing 4 years of eligibility to sign with the Capitals on a 3 year entry-level deal. At 6'5, 220 lbs, he would have been a great addition in the ECAC, however we will never know how great.

http://capitals.nhl.com/club/news.htm?id=524061

Maybe it's better for Stevenson not to be associated with a Division I college hockey team. The list of pro prospects and their ranking reveals only one college candidate, a Harvard recruit at #40 in the 100 or so prospects identified.
How many former Division I hockey players played in the NHL last year? For that matter, how many Division I dropouts played in the NFL last year? Is the talent in Junior Hockey far superior to the talent in Division I college hockey? Are colleges selling Division I recruits a bill of goods concerning either their chances of earning an education or furthering their hockey careers by matriculating? Such deception would rank pretty low. These are just kids, you know.
 
Re: Show me the money--Players turning pro

Maybe it's better for Stevenson not to be associated with a Division I college hockey team. The list of pro prospects and their ranking reveals only one college candidate, a Harvard recruit at #40 in the 100 or so prospects identified.
How many former Division I hockey players played in the NHL last year? For that matter, how many Division I dropouts played in the NFL last year? Is the talent in Junior Hockey far superior to the talent in Division I college hockey? Are colleges selling Division I recruits a bill of goods concerning either their chances of earning an education or furthering their hockey careers by matriculating? Such deception would rank pretty low. These are just kids, you know.

I'd be curious to see this "list" you're referencing, because I can guarantee any credible list has more than one college player on it.

267 players that have played in the NHL this year have also played college hockey, which is almost 1/3 of the total players in the league.
 
Re: Show me the money--Players turning pro

Maybe it's better for Stevenson not to be associated with a Division I college hockey team. The list of pro prospects and their ranking reveals only one college candidate, a Harvard recruit at #40 in the 100 or so prospects identified.

There are only 3 or 4 current NCAA hockey players, from what I quickly browsed through, in the top 150 of the NHL CSS Rankings. Why you ask? Well that's because most players get drafted before they begin playing NCAA hockey.

There are ~6 USA U-18 players in the top 50, who I can almost guarantee will play atleast 1 season in the NCAA, most probably more than that. There were several others in the Canadian and American junior leagues who will also likely be coming stateside to play NCAA hockey.

The other issue at hand here, is the whole OHL/QMJHL vs NCAA hockey, which is another can of worms completely, and really shouldn't even be mentioned. Both have their benefits, both have their drawbacks, neither one is truly better than the other as a rule, it is more of a case-by-case scenario. As an example, only because I am familiar with them, let's take the Bogosian brothers: Zach and Aaron. Zach went from Cushing Academy to Peterborough of the OHL, while his brother Aaron went from Cushing to Cedar Rapids (USHL) to St. Lawrence (ECAC). Zach, when he left Cushing, had a very good chance to get drafted high and chose the OHL as his developmental path. Aaron, who is a good player in his own right, was not likely to be drafted, and thus decided to go the college route and get an education while playing 30 minutes from home, and still might play beyond his college days after next year. Both will be very successful in life, despite them taking 2 completely different routes.
 
Last edited:
Re: Show me the money--Players turning pro

Maybe it's better for Stevenson not to be associated with a Division I college hockey team. The list of pro prospects and their ranking reveals only one college candidate, a Harvard recruit at #40 in the 100 or so prospects identified.
How many former Division I hockey players played in the NHL last year? For that matter, how many Division I dropouts played in the NFL last year? Is the talent in Junior Hockey far superior to the talent in Division I college hockey? Are colleges selling Division I recruits a bill of goods concerning either their chances of earning an education or furthering their hockey careers by matriculating? Such deception would rank pretty low. These are just kids, you know.

ah, five kids who won the national championship at BU last year have played in the nhl this year....

or were you talking about some other professional hockey league?!?! :confused:
 
Re: Show me the money--Players turning pro

Is INCH really behind on the pro signees or has nobody really signed since April first?
 
Back
Top