What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

RPI Recruit Thread 2012-13

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: RPI Recruit Thread 2012-13

I presumed it was him based on the info that Kuster is a d-man... he tends to do the most with the blueliners.

I remember seeing him the one time I went to Youngstown a couple years ago. It wouldn't surprise me if, after the St. Cloud games, one of the coaches (I would assume Graham) heads down to Lincoln.
 
Re: RPI Recruit Thread 2012-13

Any reports on Charles Manley heading to Waterloo during his holiday break? What are the rules on temporary play like we say earlier this year?
 
Re: RPI Recruit Thread 2012-13

Any reports on Charles Manley heading to Waterloo during his holiday break? What are the rules on temporary play like we say earlier this year?

Blackhawks might be looking for a Defenseman to fill a spot. Last night Victor Newell (Harvard) defenseman on the team was in a serious car accident. Manley could possibly get a call.
 
Re: RPI Recruit Thread 2012-13

Blackhawks might be looking for a Defenseman to fill a spot. Last night Victor Newell (Harvard) defenseman on the team was in a serious car accident. Manley could possibly get a call.

Obviously I don't like to see it happen under that situation because it's never good to see someone be forced out due to injury. I would think, though, that they wouldn't call up Manley for that unless they thought that Newell would be back in action come January, or else they'd have to keep cycling. I do hope that Newell recovers, and wish all the best to whomever steps in his shoes, whether it be Manley or someone else.
 
Re: RPI Recruit Thread 2012-13

I am pretty sure that DrD was considering Reno and Manley and the possibility of Kuster adn the fact that we are losing Leboeuf.

I dunno what he was considering, but 6'1 195 aint small. Lest we not forget that Bokenfohr is only a frosh -- albeit a large one.:p
 
Re: RPI Recruit Thread 2012-13

It would be great to have a 6'2-3" D-man who could bring the puck up the ice & also play the point on the PP at the D1 level but I don't see that from any of our current D-men ATT. So it doesn't surprise me to see SA going after the 5'9-11" types who can. Hampton (6') who had success at Oakville is still an unknown at this level. Like his style or not loosing Bailen could leave a big hole in that role. I've seen Reno doing it at the HS level (albeit a very HIGH HS level) so maybe he could be that 6'2" guy...would be nice for sure.
 
Re: RPI Recruit Thread 2012-13

I dunno what he was considering, but 6'1 195 aint small. Lest we not forget that Bokenfohr is only a frosh -- albeit a large one.:p

We certainly will have some large dmen. Luke alone brings up the average by a couple of inches and a several pounds. ;) My point was that Manley and the possibility of Kuster brings down the average.

BTW, I am already thinking about starting a thread called "RPI Hockey 2017-2018: Kuster's Last Stand". :D
 
Last edited:
Re: RPI Recruit Thread 2012-13

It would be great to have a 6'2-3" D-man who could bring the puck up the ice & also play the point on the PP at the D1 level but I don't see that from any of our current D-men ATT. So it doesn't surprise me to see SA going after the 5'9-11" types who can. Hampton (6') who had success at Oakville is still an unknown at this level. Like his style or not loosing Bailen could leave a big hole in that role. I've seen Reno doing it at the HS level (albeit a very HIGH HS level) so maybe he could be that 6'2" guy...would be nice for sure.
Good point about Hampton.

I still think that a bigger need is a forward to stand in front of the goal on power plays.
 
Re: RPI Recruit Thread 2012-13

We certainly will have some large dmen, Luke alone brings up the average by a couple of inches and a several pounds. ;) My point was that Manley and the possibility of Kuster brings down thea verage.

BTW, I am alredy thiking about starting a thread called "RPI Hockey 2017-2018: Kuster's Last Stand". :D
I bet you were dying to get that in :)
 
Re: RPI Recruit Thread 2012-13

We certainly will have some large dmen. Luke alone brings up the average by a couple of inches and a several pounds. ;) My point was that Manley and the possibility of Kuster brings down the average.

BTW, I am already thinking about starting a thread called "RPI Hockey 2017-2018: Kuster's Last Stand". :D

Come on dude, let's at least wait for a verbal commitment! Plus, if we win the championship in 2016, there's no guarantee he'll still be there. ;)
 
Re: RPI Recruit Thread 2012-13

Come on dude, let's at least wait for a verbal commitment! Plus, if we win the championship in 2016, there's no guarantee he'll still be there. ;)
Most true, but I can think about it. :D

Seriously, whoever spoke to Kuster might just have been asking if he was interested, and he might have wanted nothing to do with a technical program.
 
Re: RPI Recruit Thread 2012-13

Most true, but I can think about it. :D

Seriously, whoever spoke to Kuster might just have been asking if he was interested, and he might have wanted nothing to do with a technical program.

Back up in the 'dacks, we had a saying for that, and it's called "counting your chickens before they hatch". ;)
 
Re: RPI Recruit Thread 2012-13

I am pretty sure that DrD was considering Reno and Manley and the possibility of Kuster adn the fact that we are losing Leboeuf.

Yup-i was just sort of averaging the sizes. I agree with you that it is always nice to have one bigger forward on a couple of the lines but on defense I like to see guys big and strong enough to move people out of the way or ride them into the boards. I fully understand that some of the smaller guys can do that quite well at the college level but I am still rather Newtonian about it and notice very few smaller defensemen making it to the next level above the NCAA.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top