With the recent success of the Ivys and now with a surging Union program, im starting to wonder if there is some kind of advantage playing without athletic scholarships in the ECAC... If you look back, only 2 of the last 10 regular season champions were using the full 18 (SLU-07,CCT-08) and just 1 of the last 10 tournament champions used the full amount (CCT-07). Maybe its just a coinsidence but its sure starting to look like it makes a difference. Perhaps the schools that cant use athletic scholarships are getting the older, more mature players, compared to the younger players you usually pick up using a scholarship and thats where the difference is?