Re: RPI 2011-12 Season: Posts on a Message Board
Uh oh, here comes Hokydad to beotch.
I highly doubt Hockey East will adapt the Union rule.
Uh oh, here comes Hokydad to beotch.
I highly doubt Hockey East will adapt the Union rule.
It is a better fit if they have no aspirations to become NCAA champions again, do not want more national exposure for the school and the hockey program, and do not want to attract the best possible student atheletes in North America. Playing against Ivy league schools does nothing for RPI compared to playing against BU, BC, Notre Dame, Maine, etc, as far as attracting recruits and exposure to its university. I really cannot think of one good reason to stay in the ECAC if Hockey East wants them. You could play Union, Clarkson, Cornell in non league and probably rekindle the Christmas tournament with attractive schools willing to participate. Stability with the conference tournament always in the same site which happens to be in a major hockey hub. If this was a chess club maybe the ECAC would be a better fit but not if they want to be a factor as a Division 1 hockey program.
Once again, johnk you are spot on about move to Hockey East. Change is sometimes good. It is not a surprise that each time that we have declined a offer from HE we have seen erosion in the program. This is not only a tool to attract recruits but I believe that it is a reason why SA stayed. If we go to HE my friend, I am coming over to have a cocktail in the best darn Irish Pub in the Northeast. BTW- when I was having drinks with babo, tb and I mentioned our stop over at your joint and Babo wants to come over for a pop or two or five....
I guess with a 67% chance of making the playoffs every season using the 8/12 format it would really put a ton of emphasis on each and every regular season game.
As it should. Why should a team have the opportunity to go 0-22 then win 4 games at the end of the season and be given an autobid to the NCAA tournament? While the ECAC has seen several upsets by lower-seeded teams (as we are well aware), never since the league adopted its current format in 84-85 has a team lower than the 7th seed won the tournament.
1 seeds: 9 championships
2 seeds: 9 championships
3 seeds: 3 championships
4 seeds: 2 championships
5 seeds: 0 championships
6 seeds: 2 championships
7 seeds: 1 championship
8-12 seeds: 0 championships
As it should. Why should a team have the opportunity to go 0-22 then win 4 games at the end of the season and be given an autobid to the NCAA tournament?
Well, not to be negative Nancy here, but there's a bit of a difference in Hockey East - the titans.
Since 1994-95, when Hockey East expanded to nine teams by adding UMass, the "Big Four" of BC, BU, UNH, and Maine have accounted for 54 of 71 positions in the top four of the league (17 seasons, plus 3 other teams that finished in a tie for fourth). That's roughly 3 per year, which means there's not an awful lot of elbow room up there and it isn't getting any easier with a potential perennial powerhouse in Notre Dame joining the fold.
It seems to me that a subtle potential problem with that reasoning might be expanded travel time....isn't it harder (all else being even) to win regularly when you have to travel longer distances than most of the other teams in your league?
These teams view the regular season as the 'necessary evil' they have to endure merely to make it into post-season play. RPI aspires to be at that level. Many people here seem to think a 3rd place in HE will be much better seasoning for a post-season run than an ECAC autobid would be.
Once again, johnk you are spot on about move to Hockey East. Change is sometimes good. It is not a surprise that each time that we have declined a offer from HE we have seen erosion in the program. This is not only a tool to attract recruits but I believe that it is a reason why SA stayed. If we go to HE my friend, I am coming over to have a cocktail in the best darn Irish Pub in the Northeast. BTW- when I was having drinks with babo, tb and I mentioned our stop over at your joint and Babo wants to come over for a pop or two or five....
Well, the same paranoia caused the HE to be formed in the first place back in 1984.With the improvement to the facilities and other upgrades to the athletic department, this would be the time to make the move. I don't think that staying in the ECAC is necessarily a bad move, except, that, though it appears stable, I just don't trust that the Ivies won't bolt and go off on their own sometime, maybe with Colgate and possibly Holy Cross and leave the rest of the league in a bind. Call it paranoia.
With the improvement to the facilities and other upgrades to the athletic department, this would be the time to make the move. I don't think that staying in the ECAC is necessarily a bad move, except, that, though it appears stable, I just don't trust that the Ivies won't bolt and go off on their own sometime, maybe with Colgate and possibly Holy Cross and leave the rest of the league in a bind. Call it paranoia.
I guess I miss the logic here. It's not like the other teams get to travel a shorter distance to our rink than we do to theirs. So long as there is a balanced schedule (same home and away) then what difference does it make? Furthermore, keeping the team in a hotel on a road trip to BC and BU might be a better team building opportunity than taking two afternoon bus rides from Northeastern or North Andover.It seems to me that a subtle potential problem with that reasoning might be expanded travel time....isn't it harder (all else being even) to win regularly when you have to travel longer distances than most of the other teams in your league?
Paranoia sucks.
for those who have no idea what I'm talking about
Everyone.