What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

RPI 2011-12 Season: Posts on a Message Board

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: RPI 2011-12 Season: Posts on a Message Board

Line predictions for Saturday night:

Cullen-Laliberte-Higgs
Lee-AAG-O'Grady
Neal-Schroeder-Malchuk
Haggerty-Rabbanni-Tinordi

McGowan-Rogic-Smith

Bailen-Koudys
Bergin-Leboeuf
Dolan-Curadi

Diebold-Coupal

Ed Weaver's article mentions Higgs centering a line for LW Laliberte, which would change that to Cullen-Higgs-Laliberte

I was looking forward to seeing how Merriam played as the regular starter...anyone who went to the practices a few weeks ago have any comments about Diebold's style in net?

There is HOCKEY tomorrow night! :)
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Season: Posts on a Message Board

Ed Weaver's article mentions Higgs centering a line for LW Laliberte, which would change that to Cullen-Higgs-Laliberte

I was looking forward to seeing how Merriam played as the regular starter...anyone who went to the practices a few weeks ago have any comments about Diebold's style in net?

There is HOCKEY tomorrow night! :)
Thanks to you and KNS for getting the thread back on actual hockey...I was getting ready to start another thread! I don't have any insights on the early practices, but I sure as heck like the sound of Higgs and JL skating together...with Patty Cullen. Speed and skill. Love it.
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Season: Posts on a Message Board

There's one I remember... JFK's freshman year during the Governor's Cup, he just lays out this Colgate player in open ice. From watching what happened before (not much), you get the feeling the player must have "said something" to Kennedy, if you know what I mean.
"Something"...like, "Hey, you like hockey too? Did we just become best friends?";)
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Season: Posts on a Message Board

This is for the posters at large: I'd like to recommend a "LIKE" button, similar to FB...so you can give a tip of the hat to a fellow poster. Also, is there any way to prevent the thread from timing out? I hate having to constantly sign in...
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Season: Posts on a Message Board

I recall that play...one of those 'snapshot' moments that you think back to over and over (Rabbani's bone crushing hit in the playoff game last year is another)

I was the person in the red sweatshirt with "RPI" in big black letters outlined in white on the front, right by where the QU player hit the boards.....
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Season: Posts on a Message Board

This is for the posters at large: I'd like to recommend a "LIKE" button, similar to FB...so you can give a tip of the hat to a fellow poster. Also, is there any way to prevent the thread from timing out? I hate having to constantly sign in...

I think the "rep" feature is supposed to function as a "like" button...but it's not made public, and you can't rep a poster multiple times in a row. A like button would add an interesting dimension. I'm not sure exactly where or when, but I think I checked a "keep me signed in" box, which keeps the board from booting me out.
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Season: Posts on a Message Board

This is for the posters at large: I'd like to recommend a "LIKE" button, similar to FB...so you can give a tip of the hat to a fellow poster. Also, is there any way to prevent the thread from timing out? I hate having to constantly sign in...

Some message boards have a 'recommend' button next to each post, so that people can click the button for posts they particularly like. then you can search for posts recommended by someone whose judgment you like, for example; or search for most-recommended posts.

Good luck suggesting these changes to the Board administrator! I'll second the motion if you want to send along my vote to them as well.
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Season: Posts on a Message Board

Became a season ticket holder when they hired the young man from DU and became serious again.....so I'm barely a johnny come lately like you allude to in your not so veiled shot at me.

That is obvious! As far as "Johnny come lately", that is your terminology, not mine. As for taking a "not so veiled shot" at you, it was not my intent. To imply that PK is the best D talent to wear the cherry and white since Hammond is an incorrect statement in my opinion. However, that is your opinion and you're entitled to it.......I have mine. That's all I was stating. I would add Potsy (Brian Pothier), whom you didn't see, to the mix, concurring with Wicked.

Oh and congrats on #3!
 
Last edited:
Re: RPI 2011-12 Season: Posts on a Message Board

That is obvious! As far as "Johnny come lately", that is your terminology, not mine. As for taking a "not so veiled shot" at you, it was not my intent. To imply that PK is the best D talent to wear the cherry and white since Hammond is an incorrect statement in my opinion. However, that is your opinion and you're entitled to it.......I have mine. That's all I was stating. I would add Potsy (Brian Pothier), whom you didn't see, to the mix, concurring with Wicked.

Oh and congrats on #3!

IMO, PK is not the there yet but has the tools to be as good as Hammond or better by the time that he graduates.
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Season: Posts on a Message Board

Congrats to AspyDad and Mrs. Aspydad (Aspymom?). Tell me the baby is going to be a big power forward for us in 17-18 years (even if a girl-we need another Cindy Acropolis). That is much more important information than the drivel that has been spewed on the board lately. After 12 years posting here I have learned to just ignore an idiot and eventually it may just go away.
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Season: Posts on a Message Board

IMO, PK is not the there yet but has the tools to be as good as Hammond or better by the time that he graduates.

Here's hoping you are right-and that he does stay long enough to graduate. I suspect he will show enough improvement that the pressure will really be on for him to leave early.
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Season: Posts on a Message Board

Congrats to AspyDad and Mrs. Aspydad (Aspymom?). Tell me the baby is going to be a big power forward for us in 17-18 years (even if a girl-we need another Cindy Acropolis). That is much more important information than the drivel that has been spewed on the board lately. After 12 years posting here I have learned to just ignore an idiot and eventually it may just go away.

Than I would suggest you avoid mirrors at all costs. Now you know how your wife feels
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Season: Posts on a Message Board

Did Brown beat top seeded Yale? Did Colgate beat top seeded Union? Looks like teams got hot at the right time. Cleaned up playing poker at ac last year. Hope my tickets are good in Providence. RPI record against Union & Yale was pretty good last year better than any one else?
I skipped over this post earlier.

I'll take a look into it later tonight. On a quick glance over the past two years (because apparently that's what we're limited to for sample size), I'd say we did pretty well against Union, but Yale might have a better record vs them by a smidge. Without even looking at Yale's schedule, I'd say it's a pretty good bet that we had the best record against the Elis.
So, it turns out I was half-right and half-wrong with my original guess.

In in-conference games over the past two years, only Dartmouth and Yale have winning records against Union. They both went 2-1-1. RPI is tied for 5th with Brown and Colgate with 0.250 winning percentages against Union.

But, burgie12, we've played Union 7 times in the past two seasons! You're right. And that brings our record up to 0.357 (2-4-1) in the past two years. If you consider non-playoff records against Union, that's good for 5th place. If you add in Union's play in the conference playoffs to their regular season record, RPI's .357 drops into 6th place behind Colgate based on Colgate winning the playoff series this March. No matter what way you slice it, we're about middle of the pack within the ECAC in record vs Union over the past two seasons.

If you narrow it to just the 2010-11 season, then that 0.500 record we posted last season was good for tied for second. Dartmouth went 1-0-1 and therefore posted the best record against Union.

On to Yale:
Both RPI and Union split the regular season against the Elis last season. No team won the season series against Yale. So, we tied for first.

Over the past two seasons, RPI has gone 3-1-0 against Yale. St. Lawrence posted a 0.500 record in regular season play, but lost the quarterfinal round to the Bulldogs this past season, so no other team can even claim a 0.500 record overall against Yale over the past two seasons.

Combined:
Yale went 2-1-1 against Union over the past two seasons and has the best cumulative record against Union and Yale. RPI's (4-4-0, 5-5-1) record is enough for second place. So, of the ten teams not named Union or Yale, the team with the best record against those two teams is RPI. Harvard had a (3-5-0, 3-5-0) record, good for second place. (By the way, Harvard went 0-4-0 this season, which means that they actually had a 3-1-0 record against the Bulldogs and Dutchmen in the 2009-10 season, which is pretty awesome and also indicates why we need a bigger sample size than one season.)

Other:
Using the power of pivot tables, I have found that Yale has the best record during conference play against teams that received a bye in that season's playoffs. They went 9-1-2 over the past two seasons against teams that finished seeded 1-4. No other team finished above 0.500. RPI's 0.406 (6-9-1) record was good for fourth place. That record was severely brought down by their performance against Cornell (0-3-1) over the past two seasons. Clarkson had the worst record at 1-15-0.

Wow, burgie12, it seems like you can pull a lot of seemingly random and highly specific stats out of whatever you're using. You're right, again! Man, 2-for-2! Last night I started putting together a spreadsheet that includes all of the college hockey schedules (only ECAC so far) from the past few seasons (two so far). Once I fill it out a little more (I'm thinking five seasons, to start), I'll add it to my Public Dropbox folder and send out a link (no, you don't need Dropbox to view it. It's probably what I'm going to do with the PtC standings, too) so that you can take a look at the results. Ever wonder "Hmm... I wonder who performed the best in "crunch time" (February / March / April) against teams that did really well in their conference (Top 4 finish) over the past five seasons in non-friendly environments (Neutral / Away only) and disregard all games against AHA / independent teams"? No? Just me? Well, if you do ever wonder that, then this spreadsheet is going to be for you. (BTW, Yale posted the best record over the past two seasons under that criteria (4-2-0). They went into Colgate and Cornell in February of 2010 and won both games, beat NoDak in the Regionals that year, and beat Cornell in Atlantic City this past March. They lost to BC in the Regional Finals in 2010 and also lost to UMD in the Regional Finals in 2011. They are the only team from the ECAC to have a winning record under the criteria I listed above. Union is 0-4-0 over that stretch while RPI is 0-2-1.)
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Season: Posts on a Message Board

Than I would suggest you avoid mirrors at all costs. Now you know how your wife feels

It's kind of funny...

When you visit our thread, it's like the circus coming to town. Everyone comes out to laugh at the clown and heckle the bearded lady. You're most definitely a clown, and, if you do happen to be a woman, I am sure that you are bearded. Sure...we're feeding the troll by responding to anything that you say, but in your case, it's actually kind of fun. You try so hard to get under our skin, but the attempts are so transparent and feeble, that everyone laughs harder, and continues to poke you with a stick, waiting for your next ill conceived attack. Keep up the good work!
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Season: Posts on a Message Board

Other:
Using the power of pivot tables, I have found that Yale has the best record during conference play against teams that received a bye in that season's playoffs. They went 9-1-2 over the past two seasons against teams that finished seeded 1-4. No other team finished above 0.500. RPI's 0.406 (6-9-1) record was good for fourth place. That record was severely brought down by their performance against Cornell (0-3-1) over the past two seasons. Clarkson had the worst record at 1-15-0.

You have actually used a pivot table. I am impressed.
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Season: Posts on a Message Board

So, it turns out I was half-right and half-wrong with my original guess.

In in-conference games over the past two years, only Dartmouth and Yale have winning records against Union. They both went 2-1-1. RPI is tied for 5th with Brown and Colgate with 0.250 winning percentages against Union.

But, burgie12, we've played Union 7 times in the past two seasons! You're right. And that brings our record up to 0.357 (2-4-1) in the past two years. If you consider non-playoff records against Union, that's good for 5th place. If you add in Union's play in the conference playoffs to their regular season record, RPI's .357 drops into 6th place behind Colgate based on Colgate winning the playoff series this March. No matter what way you slice it, we're about middle of the pack within the ECAC in record vs Union over the past two seasons.

If you narrow it to just the 2010-11 season, then that 0.500 record we posted last season was good for tied for second. Dartmouth went 1-0-1 and therefore posted the best record against Union.

On to Yale:
Both RPI and Union split the regular season against the Elis last season. No team won the season series against Yale. So, we tied for first.

Over the past two seasons, RPI has gone 3-1-0 against Yale. St. Lawrence posted a 0.500 record in regular season play, but lost the quarterfinal round to the Bulldogs this past season, so no other team can even claim a 0.500 record overall against Yale over the past two seasons.

Combined:
Yale went 2-1-1 against Union over the past two seasons and has the best cumulative record against Union and Yale. RPI's (4-4-0, 5-5-1) record is enough for second place. So, of the ten teams not named Union or Yale, the team with the best record against those two teams is RPI. Harvard had a (3-5-0, 3-5-0) record, good for second place. (By the way, Harvard went 0-4-0 this season, which means that they actually had a 3-1-0 record against the Bulldogs and Dutchmen in the 2009-10 season, which is pretty awesome and also indicates why we need a bigger sample size than one season.)

Other:
Using the power of pivot tables, I have found that Yale has the best record during conference play against teams that received a bye in that season's playoffs. They went 9-1-2 over the past two seasons against teams that finished seeded 1-4. No other team finished above 0.500. RPI's 0.406 (6-9-1) record was good for fourth place. That record was severely brought down by their performance against Cornell (0-3-1) over the past two seasons. Clarkson had the worst record at 1-15-0.

Wow, burgie12, it seems like you can pull a lot of seemingly random and highly specific stats out of whatever you're using. You're right, again! Man, 2-for-2! Last night I started putting together a spreadsheet that includes all of the college hockey schedules (only ECAC so far) from the past few seasons (two so far). Once I fill it out a little more (I'm thinking five seasons, to start), I'll add it to my Public Dropbox folder and send out a link (no, you don't need Dropbox to view it. It's probably what I'm going to do with the PtC standings, too) so that you can take a look at the results. Ever wonder "Hmm... I wonder who performed the best in "crunch time" (February / March / April) against teams that did really well in their conference (Top 4 finish) over the past five seasons in non-friendly environments (Neutral / Away only) and disregard all games against AHA / independent teams"? No? Just me? Well, if you do ever wonder that, then this spreadsheet is going to be for you. (BTW, Yale posted the best record over the past two seasons under that criteria (4-2-0). They went into Colgate and Cornell in February of 2010 and won both games, beat NoDak in the Regionals that year, and beat Cornell in Atlantic City this past March. They lost to BC in the Regional Finals in 2010 and also lost to UMD in the Regional Finals in 2011. They are the only team from the ECAC to have a winning record under the criteria I listed above. Union is 0-4-0 over that stretch while RPI is 0-2-1.)

See, this is what happens when you provoke a bunch of nerds :D (Yes, Hoky, I realized I just called myself a nerd.)
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Season: Posts on a Message Board

It's kind of funny...

When you visit our thread, it's like the circus coming to town. Everyone comes out to laugh at the clown and heckle the bearded lady. You're most definitely a clown, and, if you do happen to be a woman, I am sure that you are bearded. Sure...we're feeding the troll by responding to anything that you say, but in your case, it's actually kind of fun. You try so hard to get under our skin, but the attempts are so transparent and feeble, that everyone laughs harder, and continues to poke you with a stick, waiting for your next ill conceived attack. Keep up the good work!

bad bews on that front, could care less what Timmah! or Flagdude thinks. Like suckerfish swimming around

Watch union vs rpi next 4-5 years. One sided and one is on the rise, other is sideways

Burgie is right though, RPI has done pretty darn well vs Union over past 2 seasons at 2-4-1. For a program on the rise, the stats dont lie......
 
Re: RPI 2011-12 Season: Posts on a Message Board

You have actually used a pivot table. I am impressed.
I just started using them a couple months ago. I have been fascinated by their capabilities, so I've started applying them to most of the spreadsheets that I make.

I still don't quite have a handle on how to effectively use PivotCharts, but it's a learning process. I'll stay focused on the PivotTables and VBA stuff for now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top